• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同重量盘宽度( bumper 与标准)对卧推生物力学的影响。

The Effect of Different Weight Plate Widths (Bumper vs. Standard) on the Biomechanics of the Bench Press.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina; and.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Apr 1;38(4):e143-e149. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004679.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004679
PMID:38513183
Abstract

Fiedler, MJ, Triplett, NT, Hamilton, KC, Needle, AR, and van Werkhoven, H. The effect of different weight plate widths (bumper vs. standard) on the biomechanics of the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 38(4): e143-e149, 2024-Anecdotal evidence suggests that bumper plates impact lifts in powerlifting and weightlifting differently than standard cast iron plates, but whether biomechanical differences exist between lifts using bumper versus standard plates has not been investigated. Eleven resistance-trained subjects performed the bench press at 70, 80, and 90% of their 1 repetition maximum (1RM) while being blinded to whether they were lifting with bumper or standard plates. Motion data were captured by an 8-camera motion capture system, and electromyography (EMG) data were recorded for the anterior deltoid, pectoralis major, and triceps brachii. Repeated-measures analysis of variances showed a significant main weight effect for time under tension (p < 0.001), total work (p < 0.001), and muscle activity through EMG (across all muscles; p < 0.001) and a significant weight × joint interaction effect for average joint moment (p < 0.001) and peak joint moment (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences observed between the different weight plates for any of the measures. The main finding of the study suggests that there are no biomechanical differences between using bumper plates compared with standard plates during the bench press lift.

摘要

菲德勒,MJ,特里普利特,NT,汉密尔顿,KC,尼尔德,AR,范·沃克霍温,H. 不同杠铃片宽度( bumper 与 standard)对卧推生物力学的影响。J 力量与调节研究 38(4):e143-e149,2024-有传闻称, bumper 杠铃片对力量举和举重的影响与标准铸铁杠铃片不同,但使用 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片进行举重是否存在生物力学差异尚未得到研究。11 名受过阻力训练的受试者在 70%、80%和 90%的 1 次重复最大重量(1RM)下进行卧推,同时对他们使用 bumper 或标准杠铃片进行举重不知情。运动数据由 8 个摄像头运动捕捉系统捕获,前三角肌、胸大肌和肱三头肌的肌电图(EMG)数据也被记录下来。重复测量方差分析显示,张力下时间(p < 0.001)、总功(p < 0.001)和通过 EMG 的肌肉活动(所有肌肉;p < 0.001)有显著的主要重量效应,以及平均关节力矩(p < 0.001)和峰值关节力矩(p < 0.001)的重量×关节交互效应有显著的主要影响。然而,在任何测量指标中,都没有观察到 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片之间有显著差异。该研究的主要发现表明,在卧推举重过程中,使用 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片之间没有生物力学差异。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Different Weight Plate Widths (Bumper vs. Standard) on the Biomechanics of the Bench Press.不同重量盘宽度( bumper 与标准)对卧推生物力学的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Apr 1;38(4):e143-e149. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004679.
2
The Effects of Palm Cooling on Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Exercise Performance, and Total Volume During High-Intensity Bench Press Exercise in Resistance-Trained Men.手掌冷却对高强度卧推训练中男性的生理和代谢反应、运动表现和总容量的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Nov 1;37(11):2122-2129. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004530. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Flat-Back vs. Arched-Back Bench Press: Examining the Different Techniques Performed by Power Athletes.平板卧推与弧形卧推:比较力量型运动员的不同技术动作。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jul 1;38(7):1200-1205. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004778. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
4
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
5
Evaluation of strength, skin temperature and muscle activation in traditional and eccentric training in Paralympic Powerlifting athletes.残奥会举重运动员传统训练与离心训练中的力量、皮肤温度和肌肉激活评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 17;15(1):25900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10530-z.
6
Differences in Various Strength Manifestations Between the Flat and Retracted Bench Press Variants: Are They Affected by Subjects' Experience or Strength Levels?平板卧推和屈臂卧推变体在各种力量表现上的差异:它们受受试者经验或力量水平的影响吗?
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Dec 1;37(12):2339-2345. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004561. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
7
Dose-Response Relationships of Resistance Training in Healthy Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.健康老年人抗阻训练的剂量-反应关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1693-720. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0385-9.
8
A Biomechanical Comparison Between a High and Low Barbell Placement on Net Joint Moments, Kinematics, Muscle Forces, and Muscle-Specific Moments in 3 Repetition Maximum Back Squats.高杠位和低杠位深蹲时 3 次最大重复负荷下净关节力矩、运动学、肌肉力量和肌肉特异性力矩的生物力学比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jul 1;38(7):1221-1230. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004790.
9
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub2.
10
Are Load-Velocity Estimates of Bench Press Maximal Strength as Accurate as Actual 1-Repetition Maximum Testing?卧推最大力量的负荷-速度估计与实际的1次重复最大测试一样准确吗?
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Oct 1;38(10):e563-e573. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004877. Epub 2024 Jul 23.