Suppr超能文献

不同重量盘宽度( bumper 与标准)对卧推生物力学的影响。

The Effect of Different Weight Plate Widths (Bumper vs. Standard) on the Biomechanics of the Bench Press.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina; and.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Apr 1;38(4):e143-e149. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004679.

Abstract

Fiedler, MJ, Triplett, NT, Hamilton, KC, Needle, AR, and van Werkhoven, H. The effect of different weight plate widths (bumper vs. standard) on the biomechanics of the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 38(4): e143-e149, 2024-Anecdotal evidence suggests that bumper plates impact lifts in powerlifting and weightlifting differently than standard cast iron plates, but whether biomechanical differences exist between lifts using bumper versus standard plates has not been investigated. Eleven resistance-trained subjects performed the bench press at 70, 80, and 90% of their 1 repetition maximum (1RM) while being blinded to whether they were lifting with bumper or standard plates. Motion data were captured by an 8-camera motion capture system, and electromyography (EMG) data were recorded for the anterior deltoid, pectoralis major, and triceps brachii. Repeated-measures analysis of variances showed a significant main weight effect for time under tension (p < 0.001), total work (p < 0.001), and muscle activity through EMG (across all muscles; p < 0.001) and a significant weight × joint interaction effect for average joint moment (p < 0.001) and peak joint moment (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences observed between the different weight plates for any of the measures. The main finding of the study suggests that there are no biomechanical differences between using bumper plates compared with standard plates during the bench press lift.

摘要

菲德勒,MJ,特里普利特,NT,汉密尔顿,KC,尼尔德,AR,范·沃克霍温,H. 不同杠铃片宽度( bumper 与 standard)对卧推生物力学的影响。J 力量与调节研究 38(4):e143-e149,2024-有传闻称, bumper 杠铃片对力量举和举重的影响与标准铸铁杠铃片不同,但使用 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片进行举重是否存在生物力学差异尚未得到研究。11 名受过阻力训练的受试者在 70%、80%和 90%的 1 次重复最大重量(1RM)下进行卧推,同时对他们使用 bumper 或标准杠铃片进行举重不知情。运动数据由 8 个摄像头运动捕捉系统捕获,前三角肌、胸大肌和肱三头肌的肌电图(EMG)数据也被记录下来。重复测量方差分析显示,张力下时间(p < 0.001)、总功(p < 0.001)和通过 EMG 的肌肉活动(所有肌肉;p < 0.001)有显著的主要重量效应,以及平均关节力矩(p < 0.001)和峰值关节力矩(p < 0.001)的重量×关节交互效应有显著的主要影响。然而,在任何测量指标中,都没有观察到 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片之间有显著差异。该研究的主要发现表明,在卧推举重过程中,使用 bumper 杠铃片与标准杠铃片之间没有生物力学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验