Suppr超能文献

将药物全生命周期定价纳入成本效果模型的挑战:方法回顾与模型建议

Challenges of Incorporating Life Cycle Drug Pricing in Cost-Effectiveness Models: A Review of Methods and Modeling Suggestions.

机构信息

Lumanity, London, England, UK.

Lumanity, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2024 Jul;27(7):978-985. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a review of existing methods used to incorporate life cycle drug pricing (LCDP) in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), identify common methodological challenges, and suggest modeling approaches for prospectively implementing LCDP in CEA.

METHODS

Two complementary searches were conducted in PubMed, combined with hand searching and reference mining, to identify English language full-text articles that explored (1) how drug prices change over time and (2) methods used to apply dynamic pricing in cost-effectiveness models (CEMs). Relevant articles were reviewed, and authors discussed the common methodological practices used in the literature and their associated challenges on prospectively implementing LCDP in CEMs. For each key challenge identified, we provide modeling suggestions to address the issue.

RESULTS

We screened 1200 studies based on title and abstract; 117 were reviewed for eligibility, and 47 individual studies were included across both searches. Variations in prices over a product's life cycle are complex and multifactorial, and models applying LCDP in CEA varied in their methodology. We identified 4 key challenges to modeling LCDP in CEA, including how to model price trends before and after loss of exclusivity, how to capture the effect of price changes on future patient cohorts, and how to report results.

CONCLUSION

Accurately quantifying the impact of LCDP requires careful consideration of multiple aspects pertaining to both the evolution of drug prices and how to reflect these in CEA. Although uncertainties remain, our findings can aid implementation and evaluation of LCDP in economic evaluations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对已有的将药物全生命周期定价(LCDP)纳入成本效果分析(CEA)的方法进行综述,识别常见的方法学挑战,并为前瞻性地将 LCDP 纳入 CEA 提出建模方法。

方法

在 PubMed 中进行了两次互补检索,结合手工检索和参考文献挖掘,以确定探讨(1)药物价格随时间变化的情况,以及(2)将动态定价应用于成本效果模型(CEM)的方法的英文全文文章。对相关文章进行了综述,并讨论了文献中常见的方法学实践及其在前瞻性地将 LCDP 纳入 CEM 中所面临的挑战。对于每个确定的关键挑战,我们提供建模建议以解决问题。

结果

我们根据标题和摘要筛选了 1200 项研究;对 117 项进行了资格审查,在两次检索中共有 47 项单独的研究被纳入。产品生命周期内的价格变化是复杂的、多因素的,应用 LCDP 的 CEA 模型在方法学上存在差异。我们确定了在 CEA 中建模 LCDP 的 4 个关键挑战,包括如何在失去专有权前后建模价格趋势,如何捕捉价格变化对未来患者群体的影响,以及如何报告结果。

结论

准确量化 LCDP 的影响需要仔细考虑与药物价格演变以及如何在 CEA 中反映这些因素相关的多个方面。尽管存在不确定性,但我们的研究结果可以帮助在经济评估中实施和评估 LCDP。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验