Haregu Tilahun Nigatu, Alemayehu Yibeltal Kiflie, Alemu Yibeltal Assefa, Medhin Girmay, Woldegiorgis Mulu Abraha, Fentaye Fasil Walelign, Gerbaba Mulusew J, Teklu Alula M
The MERQ Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Dialogues Health. 2022 Sep 22;1:100047. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100047. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Large-scale implementation of the Health Extension Program (HEP) has enabled Ethiopia to make significant progress in health services coverage and health outcomes. However, evidence on equity and disparities in the implementation of the HEP is limited. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the implementation of the HEP in Ethiopia.
We used data from the 2019 National HEP assessment which was conducted between Oct 2018 and Sept 2019 in nine regions in the country. Data were collected from 62 districts, 343 Health posts, 179 Health centres, 584 Health Extension Workers (HEWs), and 7043 women from 7122 Households. This study focused on selected input, service delivery, and coverage indicators. We used rate differences, rate ratios and index of disparity to assess disparities in HEP implementation across regions.
We found wide inter-regional disparities in HEP implementation. Developing regional states (DRS) had significantly lower availability of qualified HEWs (Rate Ratio (RR) = 0.54), proportion of households visited by Health Extension workers (RR = 0.40), and proportion of mothers who received education on child nutrition (RR = 0.45) as compared national average. There were also significant disparities in HEP implementation among DRS in the proportion of households visited by HEWs in the past 12 months (Index of disparity = 1.58) and proportion of adolescents who interacted with HEWs (Index of disparity = 1.43). Despite low overall coverage of health services in DRS, the contribution of the HEP for maternal health services was relatively high.
There were significant inter-regional disparities in the implementation HEP in Ethiopia. The level of disparity among DRS was also remarkable. To achieve Universal Health Coverage, it is important that these disparities are addressed systematically and strategically. We recommend a tailored approach in HEP implementation in DRS.
大规模实施健康推广计划(HEP)使埃塞俄比亚在卫生服务覆盖范围和健康成果方面取得了重大进展。然而,关于HEP实施过程中的公平性和差异的证据有限。本研究的目的是调查埃塞俄比亚HEP实施过程中的差异。
我们使用了2019年全国HEP评估的数据,该评估于2018年10月至2019年9月在该国九个地区进行。数据收集自62个区、343个卫生站、179个健康中心、584名健康推广工作者(HEW)以及来自7122户家庭的7043名妇女。本研究重点关注选定的投入、服务提供和覆盖指标。我们使用率差、率比和差异指数来评估各地区HEP实施的差异。
我们发现HEP实施存在广泛的地区间差异。与全国平均水平相比,发展中地区(DRS)合格HEW的可及性显著较低(率比(RR)=0.54)、健康推广工作者家访的家庭比例(RR=0.40)以及接受儿童营养教育的母亲比例(RR=0.45)。在过去12个月中,DRS之间在HEW家访家庭比例(差异指数=1.58)和与HEW互动的青少年比例(差异指数=1.43)方面,HEP实施也存在显著差异。尽管DRS的卫生服务总体覆盖率较低,但HEP对孕产妇卫生服务的贡献相对较高。
埃塞俄比亚HEP实施存在显著的地区间差异。DRS之间的差异程度也很显著。为实现全民健康覆盖,有必要系统且战略性地解决这些差异。我们建议在DRS的HEP实施中采用量身定制的方法。