• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我认为这就是‘可持续性’这个美好词汇的由来之处”:果蔬种植者关于食品生产环境用水监管的叙述。

'I think this is where this lovely word "sustainability" comes in': Fruit and vegetable growers' narratives concerning the regulation of environmental water use for food production.

作者信息

Sutcliffe Chloe, Knox Jerry, Hess Tim

机构信息

School of Water, Energy and Environment Cranfield University Bedford UK.

Science and Collections Division Royal Horticultural Society, Woking Wisley UK.

出版信息

Sociol Ruralis. 2023 Jul;63(3):493-513. doi: 10.1111/soru.12437. Epub 2023 May 2.

DOI:10.1111/soru.12437
PMID:38516359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10952321/
Abstract

This article concerns UK commercial fruit and vegetable growers' narratives regarding the sustainability of water use for food production. In it we explore their perspectives on efforts by regulators to limit agricultural withdrawals of water from the natural environment in line with EU Water Framework Directive objectives, alongside their views on retailer sustainability commitments. Discourse analysis is used to investigate how the growers contested restrictive regulation, constructed their identities, portrayed other supply chain stakeholders, and conveyed their social relations with them. Using Erving Goffman's theory of frontstage and backstage performances, the implications for the growers' water management decisions and their internalisation of sustainability agendas for water are examined. Whilst the growers gave accounts of purposely misrepresenting their water withdrawal practices and their discourse illustrated significant polarisation between environmental and agricultural interests, their underlying commitment to environmental sustainability was ambivalent, with both anti and pro-environmental attitudes expressed. The growers also frequently gave critiques of superficial sustainability in fresh produce supply chains. We argue that, given contemporary shifting definitions of agricultural identities, settings in which their construction is negotiated can provide windows of opportunity for conventional growers to engage in genuine pro-environmental performances that may deepen their assimilation of environmental goals and commitment to sustainable water use.

摘要

本文关注英国商业果蔬种植者关于食品生产用水可持续性的叙述。我们在文中探讨了他们对于监管机构为符合欧盟水框架指令目标而限制从自然环境中提取农业用水所做努力的看法,以及他们对零售商可持续发展承诺的观点。话语分析用于调查种植者如何对限制性监管提出异议、构建自身身份、描绘其他供应链利益相关者以及传达他们与这些利益相关者的社会关系。运用欧文·戈夫曼的前台与后台表演理论,研究了对种植者用水管理决策及其对水可持续发展议程内化的影响。虽然种植者讲述了故意歪曲其取水行为的情况,且他们的话语表明环境与农业利益之间存在明显两极分化,但他们对环境可持续性的潜在承诺是矛盾的,既表达了反环境态度,也表达了亲环境态度。种植者还经常对新鲜农产品供应链中表面的可持续性提出批评。我们认为,鉴于当代农业身份定义的不断变化,其身份构建得以协商的环境可以为传统种植者提供机会窗口,使其参与真正的亲环境行为,这可能会加深他们对环境目标的认同以及对可持续用水的承诺。

相似文献

1
'I think this is where this lovely word "sustainability" comes in': Fruit and vegetable growers' narratives concerning the regulation of environmental water use for food production.“我认为这就是‘可持续性’这个美好词汇的由来之处”:果蔬种植者关于食品生产环境用水监管的叙述。
Sociol Ruralis. 2023 Jul;63(3):493-513. doi: 10.1111/soru.12437. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Produce Growers' On-Farm Food Safety Education: A Review.生产者田间食品安全教育:综述。
J Food Prot. 2021 Apr 1;84(4):704-716. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-320.
3
Meeting Report: Key Outcomes from a Collaborative Summit on Agricultural Water Standards for Fresh Produce.会议报告:新鲜农产品农业用水标准合作峰会的关键成果
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 May;18(3):723-737. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12434. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
Key considerations for assessing soil ingestion exposures among agricultural workers.评估农业工人土壤摄入暴露的关键考虑因素。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022 May;32(3):481-492. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00339-z. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
Sustainability partnerships and viticulture management in California.加利福尼亚的可持续发展伙伴关系与葡萄栽培管理。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Measuring the environmental sustainability performance of global supply chains: A multi-regional input-output analysis for carbon, sulphur oxide and water footprints.衡量全球供应链的环境可持续性表现:碳、硫氧化物和水足迹的多区域投入产出分析
J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:571-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.059. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Understanding growers' decisions to manage invasive pathogens at the farm level.了解种植者在农场层面管理入侵性病原体的决策。
Phytopathology. 2012 Jun;102(6):609-19. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-11-0178.
8
A Growers' Perspective on Crop Pollination and Measures to Manage the Pollination Service of Wild Pollinators in Sweet Cherry Cultivation.种植者对甜樱桃种植中作物授粉及野生传粉者授粉服务管理措施的看法。
Insects. 2020 Jun 15;11(6):372. doi: 10.3390/insects11060372.
9
Contaminated Water and an Indication of Risk: Examining Microbial Contamination in the Water Used by Consumers and Commercial Growers in Fresh Produce Systems in Nepal.受污染的水和风险提示:检查尼泊尔新鲜农产品系统中消费者和商业种植者使用的水中的微生物污染情况。
J Food Prot. 2024 Mar;87(3):100228. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100228. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Understanding Preferences for Interventions To Reduce Microbiological Contamination in Dutch Vegetable Production.了解荷兰蔬菜生产中减少微生物污染干预措施的偏好。
J Food Prot. 2018 Jun;81(6):892-897. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-106.

本文引用的文献

1
From Identity to Enaction: Identity Behavior Theory.从身份认同到具身行动:身份行为理论
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 24;12:679490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679490. eCollection 2021.
2
Water quality and ecological risks in European surface waters - Monitoring improves while water quality decreases.欧洲地表水的水质和生态风险——监测虽有所改善,但水质却在下降。
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106479. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106479. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities.气候变化与环境态度及行为的社会身份分析:见解与机遇
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 11;7:121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121. eCollection 2016.
4
Water pollution by agriculture.农业造成的水污染
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):659-66. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2176.
5
Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices.整合社会认同理论和计划行为理论以解释参与可持续农业实践的决策。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;47(Pt 1):23-48. doi: 10.1348/014466607X206792.