Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Sep;38(7):942-953. doi: 10.1177/08901171241240529. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
Examine trust in sources of COVID-19 information and vaccination status.
Cross-sectional.
Chicago, Illinois.
Convenience sample of 538 Black adults surveyed between September 2021 and March 2022.
Trust in sources of COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccination.
Using latent class analysis, we identified classes of trust in sources of COVID-19 information. We considered predictors of class membership using multinomial logistic regression and examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between trust class membership and COVID-19 vaccination while accounting for uncertainty in class assignment.
Our analytic sample (n = 522) was predominantly aged 18-34 (52%) and female (71%). Results suggested a four-class solution: (1) low trust, (2) high trust in all sources, (3) high trust in doctor and government, and (4) high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family. Unadjusted odds of vaccination were greater in the high trust in all sources (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), high trust in doctor and government (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), and high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family classes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9) than the low trust class. However, these associations were not significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and health status factors.
Although COVID-19 vaccination varied across trust classes, our adjusted findings do not suggest a direct association between trust and vaccination, reflecting complexities in the vaccine decision-making process.
调查对 COVID-19 信息来源和疫苗接种状况的信任度。
横断面研究。
伊利诺伊州芝加哥。
2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 3 月期间调查的 538 名黑人成年人的便利样本。
对 COVID-19 信息来源的信任度、COVID-19 疫苗接种情况。
使用潜在类别分析,我们确定了对 COVID-19 信息来源的信任类别。我们使用多项逻辑回归考虑了类别成员资格的预测因素,并在考虑到类别分配不确定性的情况下,检查了信任类别成员资格与 COVID-19 疫苗接种之间的未调整和调整关联。
我们的分析样本(n=522)主要年龄在 18-34 岁(52%)和女性(71%)。结果表明存在 4 个类别解决方案:(1)低信任,(2)高度信任所有来源,(3)高度信任医生和政府,(4)高度信任医生、信仰领袖和家人。在未调整的情况下,高所有来源信任类别的疫苗接种几率更高(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.2-3.2),高医生和政府信任类别的疫苗接种几率更高(OR 2.7,95%CI 1.4-5.3),以及高医生、信仰领袖和家庭信任类别的疫苗接种几率更高(OR 2.1,95%CI 1.2-3.9),而非低信任类。然而,在调整社会人口统计学和健康状况因素后,这些关联并不显著。
尽管 COVID-19 疫苗接种在信任类别之间存在差异,但我们的调整发现并不表明信任与疫苗接种之间存在直接关联,这反映了疫苗决策过程的复杂性。