Suppr超能文献

两种用于治疗外侧上髁炎的不同矫形器的比较。

Comparison of two different orthoses used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

作者信息

Sarı Mustafa, Öztürk Demet, Bek Nilgün

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025 Feb 1;49(1):127-132. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000345. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain, and orthoses are often used in its conservative treatment. However, the number of studies examining the effectiveness of the orthoses used and their differences compared to each other is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of 2 orthoses types, wrist orthosis (WO) and counterforce brace (CB), commonly used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis on muscle activation, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction level in healthy individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

Quasi-experimental study.

METHODS

Thirty-seven healthy individuals were recruited. Muscle activation was evaluated by surface electromyography, and maximum grip strength was evaluated with a handheld dynamometer. Hand function and satisfaction level were evaluated with Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test and Orthotics and Prosthetics Users Survey, respectively. All evaluations were conducted for each individual in 3 conditions (no orthosis, WO, and CB).

RESULTS

Extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle activation was greater when using CB compared with that when without orthosis ( p = 0.036). There was no significant difference in extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle activation and maximum grip strength among the conditions ( p > 0.05). Hand function was worse when using the WO compared with the other conditions ( p < 0.001). In terms of orthosis satisfaction, individuals were found to be significantly more satisfied with the use of CB ( p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study highlight the use of CB in terms of EDC muscle activity, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction, while the use of WO is prominent in terms of keeping extensor carpi radialis muscle activity low, which has been shown to be important for LE. To obtain definitive results on the effectiveness of different orthoses in the treatment of LE, more research is needed to compare the muscular activation in the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and EDC muscles with objective methods.

摘要

背景

外侧上髁炎(LE)是外侧肘部疼痛最常见的原因之一,矫形器常用于其保守治疗。然而,研究所用矫形器有效性及其相互差异的研究数量有限。

目的

确定治疗外侧上髁炎常用的两种矫形器类型,即手腕矫形器(WO)和反作用力支具(CB),对健康个体肌肉激活、握力、手部功能和满意度的影响。

研究设计

准实验研究。

方法

招募了37名健康个体。通过表面肌电图评估肌肉激活情况,用手持测力计评估最大握力。分别用Jebsen Taylor手部功能测试和矫形器与假肢使用者调查问卷评估手部功能和满意度。对每个个体在三种情况下(不使用矫形器、使用WO和使用CB)进行所有评估。

结果

与不使用矫形器相比,使用CB时桡侧腕伸肌(ECR)的肌肉激活更大(p = 0.036)。各情况下指总伸肌(EDC)的肌肉激活和最大握力无显著差异(p > 0.05)。与其他情况相比,使用WO时手部功能更差(p < 0.001)。在矫形器满意度方面,发现个体对使用CB的满意度明显更高(p = 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究强调在EDC肌肉活动、握力、手部功能和满意度方面使用CB,而在保持桡侧腕伸肌肌肉活动较低方面使用WO较为突出,这已被证明对LE很重要。为了获得不同矫形器治疗LE有效性的确切结果,需要更多研究用客观方法比较桡侧腕短伸肌(ECRB)和EDC肌肉的肌肉激活情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验