School of Economics and Trade, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 1):118732. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118732. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
Exploring whether informal environmental regulations (INER) can achieve carbon reduction in the context of pollution reduction and carbon reduction, as well as how to achieve carbon reduction, can help solve the dual failures of the market and government in environmental protection. Based on the polycentric governance theory and considering the characteristics of social subject environmental participation, the Stackelberg game is used to demonstrate the impact mechanism of INER on CO. In addition, using the panel data of China's 30 provinces from 2003 to 2018, this paper validates the effectiveness of INER by Pooled Ordinary Least Square (POLS) and threshold panel model. Then, the mediating effect model is used to test the mechanism of INER's effect on carbon reduction. The results show that corruption is not conducive to CO reduction. The reduction effect of INER on CO exhibits heterogeneity with changes in other non-greenhouse gas pollutants. While INER effectively reduces local corruption, its more substantial indirect impact on CO reduction is prominent when levels of other pollutants are lower. Comparative analysis reveals that there are still biased governance behaviors to cope with INER's pressure in some regions nowadays. The findings show that for countries facing the dual task of pollution control and carbon reduction, the key to leveraging the supervisory role of INER should be focused on mitigating information asymmetry caused by the characteristics of CO. Therefore, in the process of environmental protection, the public environmental participation system should be improved, and the process of disclosing polluters' carbon information should be accelerated.
在减污降碳背景下探讨非正式环境规制(INER)能否实现碳减排,以及如何实现碳减排,有助于解决环境保护中市场和政府的双重失灵问题。基于多中心治理理论并考虑社会主体环境参与的特点,运用 Stackelberg 博弈展示 INER 对 CO 的影响机制。利用 2003-2018 年中国 30 个省份的面板数据,采用 Pooled Ordinary Least Square(POLS)和门槛面板模型验证 INER 的有效性。然后,运用中介效应模型检验 INER 对碳减排的作用机制。结果表明,腐败不利于 CO 的减排。INER 对 CO 的减排效应随着其他非温室气体污染物的变化而呈现异质性。虽然 INER 有效地降低了地方腐败,但当其他污染物水平较低时,其对 CO 减排的更实质性的间接影响更为显著。比较分析表明,目前一些地区仍存在应对 INER 压力的有偏治理行为。研究结果表明,对于面临污染控制和碳减排双重任务的国家来说,发挥 INER 监管作用的关键应集中在缓解 CO 特征所导致的信息不对称上。因此,在环境保护过程中,应完善公众环境参与制度,加快披露污染者碳信息的进程。