Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Spinal Cord. 2024 May;62(5):264-269. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-00984-9. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
Cross-sectional study.
To examine the differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities among ambulatory individuals, manual wheelchair users, and power wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries (SCIs).
Community setting.
Participants completed surveys of their demographics and clinical data as well as the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities- Short Form. Participants' mobility status was categorized into (1) ambulatory individuals, (2) independent manual wheelchair users, and (3) power wheelchair/scooter users. One-way ANOVA and ANCOVA were used, respectively, to examine unadjusted and adjusted differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities across mobility status. Adjustment covariates included age, sex, time since SCI, and SCI injury level.
A total of 129 participants (mean age = 47.4 ± 13.6 years, 73% male) were included in the analyses. Unadjusted (F = 3.8, p = 0.03) and adjusted models (F = 3.4, p = 0.04) evidenced significant differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities according to mobility status. Pairwise Bonferroni Post-Hoc analysis indicated that manual wheelchair users were more satisfied with their social roles and activities when compared to ambulatory individuals (mean difference = 2.8, p < 0.05).
Due to the current challenges associated with walking recovery after SCIs, clinicians may want to discuss the use of wheelchairs with individuals with limited walking ability when the goal is to improve participation and quality of life. Emphasizing alternative means of mobility may enhance satisfaction with social roles and activities.
横断面研究。
研究在脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中,活动和社会角色满意度在门诊患者、手动轮椅使用者和电动轮椅使用者之间的差异。
社区环境。
参与者完成了他们的人口统计学和临床数据以及脊髓损伤生活质量-社会角色和活动满意度-简短表格的调查。参与者的移动状态分为(1)门诊患者,(2)独立手动轮椅使用者,和(3)电动轮椅/滑板车使用者。分别使用单因素方差分析和协方差分析,在不调整和调整移动状态的情况下,检验对社会角色和活动的满意度的差异。调整协变量包括年龄、性别、SCI 后时间和 SCI 损伤水平。
共有 129 名参与者(平均年龄为 47.4±13.6 岁,73%为男性)纳入分析。未调整(F=3.8,p=0.03)和调整模型(F=3.4,p=0.04)都显示了根据移动状态的满意度的显著差异。两两 Bonferroni 事后分析表明,与门诊患者相比,手动轮椅使用者对其社会角色和活动的满意度更高(平均差异=2.8,p<0.05)。
由于 SCI 后步行恢复所面临的当前挑战,当目标是提高参与度和生活质量时,临床医生可能希望与行动能力有限的患者讨论使用轮椅。强调替代的移动方式可能会提高对社会角色和活动的满意度。