• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠道手术后慢性术后疼痛的预后因素:一项系统评价方案

Prognostic factors of chronic postsurgical pain following gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Stryhn Josephine, Rosendahl Amalie, Juhl Carsten B, Thomsen Thordis, Brandstrup Birgitte, Møller Ann M

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jul;68(6):852-856. doi: 10.1111/aas.14412. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14412
PMID:38522948
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) presents a considerable healthcare challenge, impacting patients, and healthcare providers, particularly in the context of gastrointestinal surgery. The notable incidence of CPSP in this specific surgical domain emphasizes the need to identify patients with a high risk of developing this condition. Despite various studies exploring this topic, a comprehensive systematic review focusing on prognostic factors of CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery is currently lacking. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is, through systematically examination of existing literature, to assess both established and potentially novel prognostic factors, associated with CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

Adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, we will use pre-established criteria based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Setting (PICOT-S), to determine eligibility for inclusion. Essentially, this entails studies reporting on prognostic factors of CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery. Relevant studies will be identified through systematic searches in medical databases, examination of reference lists from included studies, and screening of Clinicaltrials.gov. No restrictions will be imposed regarding language, publication time or source, and both randomized trials and observational studies will be included. Data extraction will follow the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of prognostic factor studies (CHARMS-PF) and for quality assessment, we will use the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

The aim for the systematic review is to identify and assess the prognostic value of potential factors for the development of CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery.

CONCLUSION

By creating a comprehensive overview of important prognostic factors for the development of CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery, the findings of this systematic review have the potential to guide future research and to enhance patient information resources.

摘要

背景

慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)带来了相当大的医疗挑战,影响着患者和医疗服务提供者,尤其是在胃肠外科手术领域。CPSP在这一特定手术领域的显著发病率凸显了识别有发生这种情况高风险患者的必要性。尽管有各种研究探讨了这个话题,但目前缺乏一项聚焦于胃肠外科手术后CPSP预后因素的全面系统评价。因此,本系统评价的目的是通过系统审查现有文献,评估与胃肠外科手术后CPSP相关的既定和潜在的新预后因素。

方法

遵循Cochrane手册和系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)清单,我们将使用基于人群、干预措施、对照、结局、时间和环境(PICOT-S)的预先设定标准来确定纳入资格。本质上,这需要研究报告胃肠外科手术后CPSP的预后因素。将通过在医学数据库中进行系统检索、检查纳入研究的参考文献列表以及筛选Clinicaltrials.gov来识别相关研究。对语言、发表时间或来源不设限制,随机试验和观察性研究都将纳入。数据提取将遵循预后因素研究系统评价的关键评估和数据提取清单(CHARMS-PF),对于质量评估,我们将使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具。

结果

本系统评价的目的是识别和评估胃肠外科手术后发生CPSP的潜在因素的预后价值。

结论

通过全面概述胃肠外科手术后发生CPSP的重要预后因素,本系统评价的结果有可能指导未来的研究并加强患者信息资源。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors of chronic postsurgical pain following gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review protocol.胃肠道手术后慢性术后疼痛的预后因素:一项系统评价方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jul;68(6):852-856. doi: 10.1111/aas.14412. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Chronic postsurgical pain following gastrointestinal surgery - A scoping review.胃肠道手术后的慢性术后疼痛 - 范围综述。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jan;69(1):e14560. doi: 10.1111/aas.14560.
4
Prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain after lung or pleural surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.肺或胸膜手术后慢性术后疼痛的预后因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e051554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051554.
5
Chronic post-surgical pain following gastrointestinal surgery: Protocol for a scoping review.胃肠道手术后的慢性术后疼痛:一项范围综述的方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Mar;68(3):430-433. doi: 10.1111/aas.14364. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Prognostic factors of chronic postsurgical pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年术后慢性疼痛的预后因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb 5;50(2):144-152. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105696.
7
Postoperative pain and pain management and neurocognitive outcomes after non-cardiac surgery: a protocol for a series of systematic reviews.非心脏手术后的术后疼痛和疼痛管理及神经认知结局:一系列系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 24;11(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02156-3.
8
Identification of Presurgical Risk Factors for the Development of Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Adults: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review.成人慢性术后疼痛发生的术前危险因素识别:一项综合系统评价。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 30;17:2511-2530. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S466731. eCollection 2024.
9
Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童慢性术后疼痛的患病率及预测因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pain. 2017 Jun;18(6):605-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Influence of volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia on chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials criteria: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.根据临床试验方法、测量与疼痛评估倡议标准,比较挥发性麻醉与全静脉麻醉对心脏手术后慢性术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3742-4.