Lim Ee Jean, Castellani Daniele, Somani Bhaskar K, Gökce Mehmet I, Fong Khi Yung, Sancha Fernando G, Herrmann Thomas R W, Biligere Sarvajit, Tursunkulov Azimdjon N, Dellabella Marco, Sofer Mario, Enikeev Dmitry, Petov Vladislav, Gadzhiev Nariman, Elterman Dean, Mahajan Abhay, Socarras Moises R, Yunusov Dilmurod S, Nasirov Furkat, Teoh Jeremy Y C, Gauhar Vineet
Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Prostate Int. 2024 Mar;12(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded.
Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation.
This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.
对于良性前列腺增生(BPH),前列腺内镜剜除术(EEP)已成为经尿道前列腺切除术的一种合理替代方法并得到认可。我们的主要目的是比较经验丰富的外科医生使用铥光纤激光(TFL)和高功率钬激光(HPHL)对大体积前列腺(体积≥80毫升)进行EEP的围手术期结果。次要结果是评估随访1年内的并发症。
我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2023年1月在13个中心接受TFL或HPHL治疗的良性前列腺增生患者。纳入前列腺体积≥80毫升的患者,排除合并前列腺癌、既往有前列腺/尿道手术史及盆腔放疗史的患者。
在1929例纳入患者中,1459例使用HPHL,470例使用TFL。在对基线特征进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,对每组247例患者进行分析。TFL组的总体手术时间(90 [70, 120] 分钟 vs. 52.5 [39, 93] 分钟,<0.001)和剜除时间(90 [70, 105] 分钟 vs. 38 [25, 70] 分钟,<0.001)更长,而粉碎时间相当(13 [10, 19.5] 分钟 vs. 13 [10, 16.5] 分钟,=0.914)。在术后结果方面,30天并发症如急性尿潴留(AUR)、尿路感染或脓毒症无差异。在PSM队列中,单因素分析显示年龄较大、术前最大尿流率(Qmax)较低、术前残余尿量(PVRU)较高和手术时间较长与术后尿失禁几率较高相关,而两叶剜除术与三叶剜除术相比尿失禁几率较低。
这项真实世界研究再次证实,对于大体积前列腺,HPHL和TFL在30天并发症方面同样有效。采用整块切除技术的TFL手术时间较短,显著改善了短期和中期功能结果。