Agrawal Ankita, Sharma Anant Ragav, Rathod Varsha, Bhatnagar Anand, Amol Khale Pallavi, Tidke Priyanka, Mehta Dhaval, Mazumder Debojyoti
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Department of Periodontics, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54619. eCollection 2024 Feb.
The use of locally administered medication (LAM) agents such as minocycline, metronidazole, and tetracycline as antimicrobials has drawbacks, including the development of microorganism resistance, exorbitant pricing, and limited accessibility. Thus, there is a need for safer and more affordable alternatives. Numerous natural therapies have been found to be superior in this situation. In this study, the efficacy of tulsi extract as a LAM agent was assessed and it was compared with curcumin, which is currently used for the treatment of periodontal pockets.
There were three categories: each category had 30 sites. Category 1 sites underwent scaling along with root planing (SRP) solely, Category 2 sites received curcumin extract as LAM in the periodontal pocket in addition to SRP, and Category 3 sites received tulsi extract as LAM in the periodontal pocket in addition to SRP. The stent was used to ensure consistent and unbiased measurements on the 30th day after treatment. Clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing pocket depth (PPD) were measured at six points around each tooth. Results: The reduction in values of periodontal parameters such as BAPNA (Nα-benzoyl-DL-arginine-p-nitroanilide) assays, modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), CAL, and PPD in sites within Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3 was statistically significant. The decrease in BAPNA assay results indicates that tulsi extract is more effective than curcumin gel at eradicating red-complex bacteria. Although not significantly different, the decrease in PI and GI was observed to be greater when curcumin jelly was used. This suggests that curcumin jelly has a stronger impact on reducing plaque, which in turn decreases gingival inflammation.
Based on the overall results of the study, it can be said that both tulsi and curcumin have similar effectiveness in reducing periodontal markers.
使用局部给药(LAM)药物如米诺环素、甲硝唑和四环素作为抗菌剂存在缺点,包括微生物耐药性的产生、价格过高以及可及性有限。因此,需要更安全且更经济实惠的替代方案。在这种情况下,已发现许多天然疗法更具优势。在本研究中,评估了罗勒提取物作为局部给药药物的疗效,并将其与目前用于治疗牙周袋的姜黄素进行了比较。
分为三类,每类有30个部位。第1类部位仅进行龈下刮治术和根面平整术(SRP),第2类部位除SRP外,在牙周袋内接受姜黄素提取物作为局部给药药物,第3类部位除SRP外,在牙周袋内接受罗勒提取物作为局部给药药物。使用支架以确保在治疗后第30天进行一致且无偏倚的测量。在每颗牙齿周围的六个点测量临床附着水平(CAL)和探诊袋深度(PPD)。结果:第1类、第2类和第3类部位的牙周参数值降低,如BAPNA(Nα-苯甲酰-DL-精氨酸对硝基苯胺)测定、改良龈沟出血指数(mSBI)、牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、CAL和PPD,具有统计学意义。BAPNA测定结果的降低表明,罗勒提取物在根除红色复合体细菌方面比姜黄素凝胶更有效。虽然差异不显著,但使用姜黄素凝胶时PI和GI的降低更大。这表明姜黄素凝胶在减少菌斑方面有更强的作用,进而减少牙龈炎症。
基于该研究的总体结果,可以说罗勒和姜黄素在降低牙周指标方面具有相似的效果。