Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术中用于建立气腹的开放式(哈森氏)和闭合式(韦雷斯氏)腹腔穿刺技术的评估

Evaluation of Open (Hasson's) and Closed (Veress) Technique of Intraperitoneal Access for Creation of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery.

作者信息

Kumar Saakshie, Dubey Indu B, Aggarwal Vridhi Chand, Soni Rajesh K

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54770. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54770. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background The creation of pneumoperitoneum is the first step in any laparoscopic surgery. There are various methods of creating pneumoperitoneum which can be divided into open or closed methods. The closed method involves the blind insertion of the Veress needle into the peritoneal cavity. The open technique involves making an incision and then dissecting the fascia to the peritoneal cavity to introduce the cannula under direct vision. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of open (Hasson's) and closed (Veress) techniques of intraperitoneal access for the creation of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Material and methods The study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. This was a prospective observational study and a total of 100 patients of laparoscopic surgeries fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in the study - 50 patients in group A undergoing the open method of creating pneumoperitoneum and 50 patients in group B undergoing the closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum were evaluated for the study period of 18 months from October 2020 through June 2022. Results The mean time to create pneumoperitoneum was 5.3 ± 1.41 minutes in the open method and 6.21 ± 1.36 minutes in the closed method. The mean time for umbilical port closure in our study was 7.33 ± 1.66 in the open group and 8.86 ± 2.19 in the closed group. In our study, there was no vascular or visceral injury noted in either of the methods used for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Post-operative complications were almost equal in both the groups. Conclusions Both open and closed methods of intraperitoneal access are safe and effective for the creation of pneumoperitoneum during abdominal laparoscopy. The open method of creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery is a quicker method for the creation of pneumoperitoneum as compared to the closed method of intraperitoneal access.

摘要

背景

建立气腹是任何腹腔镜手术的第一步。建立气腹有多种方法,可分为开放法或闭合法。闭合法是将韦雷氏针盲目插入腹腔。开放技术是先做一个切口,然后将筋膜解剖至腹腔,在直视下插入套管。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜手术中开放(哈森氏)和闭合(韦雷氏)腹腔穿刺技术建立气腹的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

本研究在新德里瓦尔丹·马哈拉施特拉医学院和萨夫达容医院普通外科进行。这是一项前瞻性观察研究,共有100例符合纳入标准的腹腔镜手术患者纳入研究——2020年10月至2022年6月为期18个月的研究期间,对A组50例采用开放法建立气腹的患者和B组50例采用闭合法建立气腹的患者进行评估。

结果

开放法建立气腹的平均时间为5.3±1.41分钟,闭合法为6.21±1.36分钟。本研究中,开放组脐部切口闭合的平均时间为7.33±1.66分钟,闭合组为8.86±2.19分钟。在本研究中,两种建立气腹的方法均未发现血管或内脏损伤。两组术后并发症几乎相同。

结论

开放和闭合腹腔穿刺方法在腹部腹腔镜手术中建立气腹均安全有效。与闭合腹腔穿刺法相比,腹腔镜手术中开放法建立气腹是一种更快的方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues.建立气腹:Verres针还是哈森套管针?争论仍在继续。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Jan;93(1):22-4. doi: 10.1308/003588411X12851639107557. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验