Suppr超能文献

印度东北部一家三级护理医院对接受常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者采用腹腔镜原发性腹膜穿刺孔闭合技术与开放技术的安全性和发病情况的研究。

A Study of the Safety and Morbidity Profile of Closed versus Open Technique of Laparoscopic Primary Peritoneal Access Port in Patients Undergoing Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northeastern India.

作者信息

Baruah A, Topno N, Ghosh S, Naku N, Hajong R, Tongper D, Khongwar D, Baruah P, Chishi N, Sutradhar S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institue of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, M.P., India.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jul 12;2022:1017551. doi: 10.1155/2022/1017551. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard operation for gallstone disease. Primary port placement into the abdomen is a blind procedure and is challenging with chances of unforeseen complications. The complication rate has remained the same during the past 25 years. Both closed/Veress and open/Hasson's techniques are commonly employed and have their typical indications for use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Shillong, from January 2014 to January 2016, with the aim to compare the safety profile of closed/Veress and open/Hasson's methods of access to the abdomen during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The study had 400 eligible cases undergoing LC who were randomly allotted into 2 groups with 200 cases each: group A: closed/Veress needle method and group B: open/Hasson's method.

RESULTS

Closed/Veress and open/Hasson's method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications. The closed/Veress method gives faster access to the abdomen as compared to the open method (5.62 ± 2.23 minutes and 7.18 ± 2.52 minutes, respectively, value <0.0001). The open/Hasson's method is associated with more primary port site complications (9/200 vs. 0/200, value 0.0036) and troublesome intraoperative gas leaks (39/200 vs. 2/200, value <0.0001). The open technique for primary peritoneal access port for laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not impart any additional benefits in terms of safety and morbidity profile in patients undergoing LC.

CONCLUSION

The closed/Veress method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications and gives quicker access to the abdomen as compared to the open method.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是胆结石疾病的金标准手术。将初始端口置入腹腔是一种盲目操作,具有挑战性,且存在出现意外并发症的可能性。在过去25年中,并发症发生率一直保持不变。闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法和开放式/哈森氏法均被广泛应用,且各有其典型的适用指征。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究于2014年1月至2016年1月在西隆的东北英迪拉·甘地区域卫生与医学科学研究所(NEIGRIHMS)普通外科进行,旨在比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法和开放式/哈森氏法进入腹腔的安全性。该研究纳入400例符合条件的接受LC手术的患者,随机分为两组,每组200例:A组:闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法;B组:开放式/哈森氏法。

结果

在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,就主要并发症而言,闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法和开放式/哈森氏法建立气腹的安全性相当。与开放式方法相比,闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法进入腹腔的速度更快(分别为5.62±2.23分钟和7.18±2.52分钟,P值<0.0001)。开放式/哈森氏法与更多的初始端口部位并发症相关(9/200 vs. 0/200,P值0.0036)以及术中出现更多麻烦的气体泄漏(39/200 vs. 2/200,P值<0.0001)。对于接受LC手术的患者,腹腔镜胆囊切除术的开放式初始腹膜进入端口技术在安全性和发病率方面并未带来任何额外益处。

结论

在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,就主要并发症而言,闭合式/韦雷氏针穿刺法建立气腹同样安全,且与开放式方法相比,进入腹腔的速度更快。

相似文献

7
Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Feb;9(1):75-80. doi: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.75.
8
Port Site Consequences After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using an Open Versus Closed Approach of Pneumoperitoneum.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 1;14(7):e26499. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26499. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Comparison Between Closed and Open Methods for Creating Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 10;15(3):e35991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35991. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):QC04-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18049.7252. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:305428. doi: 10.1155/2012/305428. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
3
Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery.
J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009 Jan;1(1):4-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.51902.
5
An open access technique to create pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery.
Scand J Surg. 2007;96(4):297-300. doi: 10.1177/145749690709600407.
7
Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;190(3):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.035.
8
9
Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Aug;10(3):415-20.
10
A technique for open trocar placement in laparoscopic surgery using the umbilical cicatrix tube.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1366-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8308-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验