Osman Alaa Ma, Arabi Alya A
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin P.O. Box: 15551, United Arab Emirates.
ACS Omega. 2024 Mar 5;9(11):13172-13182. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09732. eCollection 2024 Mar 19.
Bioisosterism is strategically used in drug design to enhance the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of therapeutic molecules. The average electron density (AED) tool has been used in several studies to quantify similarities among nonclassical bioisosteres of carboxylic acid. In this study, the AED tool is used to quantify the similarities among nonclassical bioisosteres of an amide group. In particular, amide-to-1,2,3-triazole bioisosterism is considered. To evaluate the AED differences exhibited by isomers of nonclassical bioisosteres, both isomers of amide ( and ) and 1,2,3-triazole (1,4 and 1,5 disubstituted moieity) were considered. The amide and 1,2,3-triazole bioisosteric moieties were capped with various R groups (= methyl, hydrogen, and chloro) to account for changes in their environment. Amide-to-triazole bioisosteric substitutions were then explored in a more realistic environment, that is, within the FDA-approved anticancer imatinib drug. The AED tool effectively identified similarities between substantially different moieties, 1,2,3-triazole and amide, showing AED differences of no more than 4%. The AED tool was also proven to be useful in evaluating the contribution of various factors affecting triazole-amide bioisosterism including isomerism and changes in their environment. The AED values of each bioisostere were transferable within a maximum difference of 2.6%, irrespective of the change in environment. The 1,4- and 1,5-disubstituted isomers of 1,2,3-triazole have AED values that differ by less than unity, 0.52%. Similarly, the AED values of the - and -amide isomers differ by only 1.31%. Overall, the AED quantitative tool not only replicated experimental observations regarding similarities in bioisosteres, but also explained and quantified each contributing factor. This demonstrates the extended utility of the AED tool from nonclassical carboxylic acid bioisosteres to amide equivalents.On the contrary, electrostatic potential maps, usually used in the literature to qualitatively evaluate bioisosterism, were not similar for the 1,2,3-triazole and amide bioisosteres, under different environments. Overall, the AED tool proves to be powerful in quantitatively evaluating and predicting bioisosterism across diverse moieties considering structural and environmental variations, making it valuable in drug design.
生物电子等排体原理在药物设计中被策略性地应用,以增强治疗性分子的药代动力学和药效学性质。平均电子密度(AED)工具已在多项研究中用于量化羧酸非经典生物电子等排体之间的相似性。在本研究中,AED工具用于量化酰胺基团非经典生物电子等排体之间的相似性。特别考虑了酰胺到1,2,3-三唑的生物电子等排体原理。为了评估非经典生物电子等排体异构体所表现出的AED差异,同时考虑了酰胺的两种异构体(和)以及1,2,3-三唑的两种异构体(1,4和1,5二取代部分)。酰胺和1,2,3-三唑生物电子等排体部分用各种R基团(=甲基、氢和氯)封端,以考虑其环境变化。然后在更现实的环境中,即在FDA批准的抗癌药物伊马替尼中探索酰胺到三唑的生物电子等排体取代。AED工具有效地识别了截然不同的部分1,2,3-三唑和酰胺之间的相似性,显示AED差异不超过4%。AED工具还被证明可用于评估影响三唑-酰胺生物电子等排体原理的各种因素的贡献,包括异构现象及其环境变化。无论环境如何变化,每个生物电子等排体的AED值在最大差异为2.6%的范围内是可转移的。1,2,3-三唑的1,4-和1,5-二取代异构体的AED值相差小于1,为0.52%。同样,-和-酰胺异构体的AED值仅相差1.31%。总体而言,AED定量工具不仅重现了关于生物电子等排体相似性的实验观察结果,还解释并量化了每个促成因素。这证明了AED工具从非经典羧酸生物电子等排体到酰胺类似物的扩展效用。相反,文献中通常用于定性评估生物电子等排体原理的静电势图,在不同环境下,1,2,3-三唑和酰胺生物电子等排体并不相似。总体而言,AED工具被证明在考虑结构和环境变化的情况下,对跨不同部分的生物电子等排体原理进行定量评估和预测方面非常强大,使其在药物设计中具有价值。