• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇治疗的纵向模式。

Longitudinal patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroid therapy for asthma in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Tran Trung N, Heatley Heath, Rowell Jennifer, Chan Jeffrey Shi Kai, Bourdin Arnaud, Chapaneri Jatin, Emmanuel Benjamin, Gibson Danny, Jackson David J, Menzies-Gow Andrew N, Murray Ruth, Skinner Derek, Price David B

机构信息

BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md.

Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Feb 2;3(2):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100225. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100225
PMID:38524787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10959664/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing frequency of intermittent oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescription and cumulative OCS exposure increase the risk of OCS-related adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the evolution and trajectory of intermittent OCS prescription patterns in patients with asthma and investigate risk factors independently associated with transitioning to a frequent prescription pattern.

METHODS

This historical cohort study included patients with active asthma managed in UK primary care and included in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD; opcrd.co.uk). Intermittent OCS prescription patterns were categorized as sporadic, infrequent, moderately frequent, or frequent. Prescription pattern sequences were described for those who had a frequent sequence in their final year of prescribing. We examined associations between OCS prescription pattern and the hazard of transitioning into a frequent intermittent OCS prescription pattern using multivariable Cox regression with a 10-year look-back period.

RESULTS

Of 105,229 patients with intermittent OCS prescriptions, 57.1% (n = 60,083) had a frequent OCS prescription pattern at some point. Irrespective of baseline pattern, most patients transitioned to frequent prescription during the look back. The strongest risk factors were a more frequent prescription pattern at the start of look-back period, a lower percentage peak expiratory flow rate, and higher Global Initiative for Asthma treatment step. Older age, female sex, obesity, and active smoking were also associated with a higher risk of transitioning.

CONCLUSION

Our findings help identify those most at risk of transitioning to frequent intermittent OCS receipt and encourage earlier intervention with OCS-sparing treatments.

摘要

背景

间歇性口服糖皮质激素(OCS)处方频率增加以及OCS累积暴露会增加与OCS相关不良结局的风险。

目的

我们试图描述哮喘患者间歇性OCS处方模式的演变和轨迹,并调查与转变为频繁处方模式独立相关的风险因素。

方法

这项历史性队列研究纳入了在英国初级医疗中接受管理且纳入最佳患者护理研究数据库(OPCRD;opcrd.co.uk)的活动性哮喘患者。间歇性OCS处方模式分为偶发、不频繁、中度频繁或频繁。描述了在最后一年处方中有频繁模式序列的患者的处方模式序列。我们使用具有10年回顾期的多变量Cox回归分析了OCS处方模式与转变为频繁间歇性OCS处方模式风险之间的关联。

结果

在105,229例有间歇性OCS处方的患者中,57.1%(n = 60,083)在某些时候有频繁的OCS处方模式。无论基线模式如何,大多数患者在回顾期间转变为频繁处方。最强的风险因素是回顾期开始时更频繁的处方模式、较低的呼气峰值流速百分比以及较高的全球哮喘防治创议治疗级别。年龄较大、女性、肥胖和当前吸烟也与转变风险较高相关。

结论

我们的研究结果有助于识别那些最有可能转变为频繁接受间歇性OCS治疗的患者,并鼓励更早地采用减少OCS使用的治疗方法进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/10959664/e2d7cae25d70/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/10959664/20c5ff4a1d42/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/10959664/e2d7cae25d70/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/10959664/20c5ff4a1d42/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/10959664/e2d7cae25d70/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroid therapy for asthma in the United Kingdom.英国哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇治疗的纵向模式。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Feb 2;3(2):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100225. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Observational UK cohort study to describe intermittent oral corticosteroid prescribing patterns and their association with adverse outcomes in asthma.观察性英国队列研究,旨在描述哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇的处方模式及其与不良结局的关联。
Thorax. 2023 Sep;78(9):860-867. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219642. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Intermittent Oral Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in Asthma.与哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇处方模式相关的医疗资源利用情况
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Jun 21;17:573-587. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S452305. eCollection 2024.
4
Oral corticosteroid exposure and adverse effects in asthmatic patients.哮喘患者的口服皮质类固醇暴露和不良反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):110-116.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Oral corticosteroid prescription patterns for asthma in France, Germany, Italy and the UK.法国、德国、意大利和英国的哮喘患者口服皮质类固醇处方模式。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02363-2019. Print 2020 Jun.
6
Evaluating the real-life effect of MP-AzeFlu on asthma outcomes in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma in UK primary care.评估MP-AzeFlu对英国初级医疗中过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者哮喘结局的实际影响。
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Dec 19;13(12):100490. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100490. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
High oral corticosteroid exposure and overuse of short-acting beta-2-agonists were associated with insufficient prescribing of controller medication: a nationwide electronic prescribing and dispensing database analysis.高剂量口服皮质类固醇暴露和短效β-2激动剂的过度使用与控制药物处方不足相关:一项全国性电子处方和配药数据库分析。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2019 Sep 23;9:47. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0286-3. eCollection 2019.
8
Oral corticosteroid use, morbidity and mortality in asthma: A nationwide prospective cohort study in Sweden.口服皮质类固醇的使用与哮喘的发病率和死亡率:瑞典全国前瞻性队列研究。
Allergy. 2019 Nov;74(11):2181-2190. doi: 10.1111/all.13874. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Prescription Patterns of Oral Corticosteroids for Asthma Treatment and Related Asthma Phenotypes in University Hospitals in Korea.韩国大学医院中用于哮喘治疗的口服皮质类固醇的处方模式及相关哮喘表型
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2022 May;14(3):300-313. doi: 10.4168/aair.2022.14.3.300.
10
Overuse of Oral Corticosteroids in Asthma Is Often Underdiagnosed and Inadequately Addressed.哮喘患者中皮质类固醇类药物的过度使用常被漏诊且处理不足。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Aug;10(8):2093-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of an algorithm to analyze patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroid use in asthma.应用算法分析哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇使用模式。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023 Mar 4;33(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41533-023-00331-0.
2
Observational UK cohort study to describe intermittent oral corticosteroid prescribing patterns and their association with adverse outcomes in asthma.观察性英国队列研究,旨在描述哮喘间歇性口服皮质类固醇的处方模式及其与不良结局的关联。
Thorax. 2023 Sep;78(9):860-867. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219642. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Characterisation of the Australian Adult Population Living with Asthma: Severe - Exacerbation Frequency, Long-Term OCS Use and Adverse Effects.
澳大利亚成年哮喘患者的特征:严重发作频率、长期口服糖皮质激素使用情况及不良反应
Pragmat Obs Res. 2022 Jul 5;13:43-58. doi: 10.2147/POR.S360044. eCollection 2022.
4
Oral corticosteroids stewardship for asthma in adults and adolescents: A position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰胸科学会成人和青少年哮喘口服皮质类固醇管理:立场文件。
Respirology. 2021 Dec;26(12):1112-1130. doi: 10.1111/resp.14147. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Short-course systemic corticosteroids in asthma: striking the balance between efficacy and safety.哮喘的短程全身皮质类固醇治疗:在疗效和安全性之间取得平衡。
Eur Respir Rev. 2020 Apr 3;29(155). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0151-2019. Print 2020 Mar 31.
6
Oral corticosteroid prescription patterns for asthma in France, Germany, Italy and the UK.法国、德国、意大利和英国的哮喘患者口服皮质类固醇处方模式。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02363-2019. Print 2020 Jun.
7
Characterization of Severe Asthma Worldwide: Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry.全球重症哮喘特征:来自国际重症哮喘登记处的数据。
Chest. 2020 Apr;157(4):790-804. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.053. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management.系统文献综述:全身性皮质类固醇在哮喘管理中的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 1;201(3):276-293. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0903SO.