Ashourzadeh Sareh, Safari Somayyeh, Hosseinisadat Robabe, Kafaeinezhad Raheleh, Shokri Saeed, Alaee Sanaz
Afzalipour Clinical Center for Infertility, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2024 Dec;51(4):285-292. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2023.06408. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
This study compared the outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), tubal factor (TF) infertility, and unexplained infertility whose partners had normal semen parameters.
This retrospective study included 360 couples diagnosed with infertility involving PCOS (n=157), unexplained infertility (n=140), and TF infertility (n=63). Sibling oocytes were randomly assigned to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF insemination. The fertilization rate and embryo morphology were evaluated as outcomes.
Retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes from patients with PCOS (2,974), unexplained infertility (1,843), and TF infertility (844) were split and inseminated by conventional IVF and ICSI respectively. In comparison to the ICSI method, the conventional IVF approach was linked to a significantly higher fertilization rate in groups with PCOS (68.81% vs. 77.49%), unexplained infertility (67.62% vs. 78.84%), and TF issues (69.23% vs. 78.63%) (p<0.05). The proportion of embryos with grade A produced by the conventional IVF method was significantly higher than that produced using the ICSI method in the PCOS and unexplained infertility groups (p<0.05). Additionally, the percentage of grade B embryos produced with the ICSI method was significantly higher than that produced with the conventional IVF method in PCOS patients (p=0.002).
Our results indicated that the conventional IVF method was associated with higher zygote production and a higher proportion of grade A embryos when all infertile groups were evaluated together. Thus, ICSI is not suggested for patients with these causes of infertility if their partner has normal semen parameters.
本研究比较了多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)、输卵管因素(TF)不孕和不明原因不孕且伴侣精液参数正常的患者接受常规体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的结局。
这项回顾性研究纳入了360对被诊断为不孕的夫妇,其中包括PCOS患者(n = 157)、不明原因不孕患者(n =
140)和TF不孕患者(n = 63)。将同胞卵母细胞随机分配接受ICSI或常规IVF授精。评估受精率和胚胎形态作为结局。
分别从PCOS患者(2974个)、不明原因不孕患者(1843个)和TF不孕患者(844个)中获取卵丘-卵母细胞复合体并进行分割,然后分别通过常规IVF和ICSI进行授精。与ICSI方法相比,常规IVF方法在PCOS组(68.81%对77.49%)、不明原因不孕组(67.62%对78.84%)和TF问题组([69.23%对78.63%)中与显著更高的受精率相关(p<0.05)。在PCOS组和不明原因不孕组中,常规IVF方法产生的A级胚胎比例显著高于ICSI方法(p<0.05)。此外,在PCOS患者中,ICSI方法产生的B级胚胎百分比显著高于常规IVF方法(p = 0.002)。
我们的结果表明,当对所有不孕组进行综合评估时,常规IVF方法与更高的合子生成率和更高比例的A级胚胎相关。因此,如果伴侣精液参数正常,不建议这些不孕原因的患者使用ICSI。