• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect of older age on outcomes of rTMS treatment for treatment-resistant depression.年龄较大对难治性抑郁症重复经颅磁刺激治疗结果的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Nov;36(11):1070-1075. doi: 10.1017/S1041610224000462. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
A comparison of self- and observer-rated scales for detecting clinical improvement during repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) treatment of depression.自我评估和观察者评估量表在检测重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症期间临床改善的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Dec;330:115608. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115608. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 criterion in patients with major depressive disorder without psychotic features: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.重复经颅磁刺激对无精神病特征的重性抑郁障碍患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17 项评定标准的影响:干预研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 10;12(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01981-6.
4
Association of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment With Subgenual Cingulate Hyperactivity in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.重复经颅磁刺激治疗与重性抑郁障碍患者扣带回下皮质活动过度的相关性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5578.
5
Effectiveness of Standard Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation vs Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation in Older Adults With Depression: The FOUR-D Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.标准序贯双侧重复经颅磁刺激与双侧θ爆发刺激治疗老年抑郁症的疗效比较:FOUR-D 随机非劣效性临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1065-1073. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2862.
6
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders in Singapore.新加坡重复经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁障碍和强迫症。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2024 Aug 29;53(8):471-480. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496.
7
A randomized double-blind sham-controlled comparison of unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression.一项针对难治性重度抑郁症的单侧和双侧重复经颅磁刺激的随机双盲假刺激对照比较。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;13(6):423-35. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.579163. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
8
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 May;75(5):477-89; quiz 489. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13r08815.
9
Cognitive safety of dorsomedial prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression.背内侧前额叶重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症的认知安全性
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Jul;26(7):1213-26. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
rTMS for pharmacoresistant major depression in the clinical setting of a psychiatric hospital: effectiveness and effects of age.rTMS 治疗精神病院临床环境中药物难治性重度抑郁症:疗效与年龄的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Late-Life Depression: A Scoping Review.经颅磁刺激治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3609. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103609.
2
Treating Depression With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Clinician's Guide.重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症:临床医生指南
Am J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 1;182(6):525-541. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20240859. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Predictive modeling of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.难治性抑郁症对重复经颅磁刺激反应的预测模型
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 27;15(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03380-w.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of self- and observer-rated scales for detecting clinical improvement during repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) treatment of depression.自我评估和观察者评估量表在检测重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症期间临床改善的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Dec;330:115608. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115608. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Finally, New Hope for the Treatment of LLTRD.最后,治疗LLTRD的新希望。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;31(12):1042-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.07.016. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
3
Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.氯胺酮与电休克治疗非精神病性治疗抵抗性重性抑郁障碍。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2315-2325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302399. Epub 2023 May 24.
4
Treatment-Resistant Late-Life Depression: A Review of Clinical Features, Neuropsychology, Neurobiology, and Treatment.治疗抵抗的老年期抑郁症:临床特征、神经心理学、神经生物学和治疗的综述。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2023 Jun;46(2):371-389. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Ketamine treatment for depression: a review.氯胺酮治疗抑郁症:综述
Discov Ment Health. 2022;2(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s44192-022-00012-3. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
6
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗老年抑郁症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):851-860. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab235.
7
Clinical outcomes in a large registry of patients with major depressive disorder treated with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.一项大型重度抑郁症患者经颅磁刺激治疗注册研究的临床结局。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Sep 15;2:16065. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.65.
9
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 3;51:181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
Predictors of antidepressant response in clinical trials of transcranial magnetic stimulation.经颅磁刺激临床试验中抗抑郁反应的预测因素。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;9(6):641-54. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705006280. Epub 2005 Nov 23.

年龄较大对难治性抑郁症重复经颅磁刺激治疗结果的影响。

The effect of older age on outcomes of rTMS treatment for treatment-resistant depression.

作者信息

Leuchter Michael K, Citrenbaum Cole, Wilson Andrew C, Tibbe Tristan D, Jackson Nicholas J, Krantz David E, Wilke Scott A, Corlier Juliana, Strouse Thomas B, Hoftman Gil D, Tadayonnejad Reza, Koek Ralph J, Slan Aaron R, Ginder Nathaniel D, Distler Margaret G, Artin Hewa, Lee John H, Adelekun Adesewa E, Einstein Evan H, Oughli Hanadi A, Leuchter Andrew F

机构信息

TMS Clinical and Research Program, Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Nov;36(11):1070-1075. doi: 10.1017/S1041610224000462. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1017/S1041610224000462
PMID:38525670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11422516/
Abstract

Clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) vary widely and there is no mood rating scale that is standard for assessing rTMS outcome. It remains unclear whether TMS is as efficacious in older adults with late-life depression (LLD) compared to younger adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study examined the effect of age on outcomes of rTMS treatment of adults with TRD. Self-report and observer mood ratings were measured weekly in 687 subjects ages 16-100 years undergoing rTMS treatment using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 30-item Self-Report (IDS-SR), Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ), Profile of Mood States 30-item, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS). All rating scales detected significant improvement with treatment; response and remission rates varied by scale but not by age (response/remission ≥ 60: 38%-57%/25%-33%; <60: 32%-49%/18%-25%). Proportional hazards models showed early improvement predicted later improvement across ages, though early improvements in PHQ and HDRS were more predictive of remission in those < 60 years (relative to those ≥ 60) and greater baseline IDS burden was more predictive of non-remission in those ≥ 60 years (relative to those < 60). These results indicate there is no significant effect of age on treatment outcomes in rTMS for TRD, though rating instruments may differ in assessment of symptom burden between younger and older adults during treatment.

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的临床疗效差异很大,且尚无用于评估rTMS疗效的标准情绪评定量表。与患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的年轻人相比,TMS对患有老年期抑郁症(LLD)的老年人是否同样有效仍不清楚。本研究考察了年龄对rTMS治疗成人TRD疗效的影响。对687名年龄在16至100岁接受rTMS治疗的受试者,每周使用30项抑郁症状自评量表(IDS-SR)、9项患者健康问卷(PHQ)、30项情绪状态剖面图和17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)进行自我报告和观察者情绪评定。所有评定量表均检测到治疗后有显著改善;不同量表的缓解率和治愈率有所不同,但与年龄无关(缓解/治愈≥60:38%-57%/25%-33%;<60:32%-49%/18%-25%)。比例风险模型显示,各年龄段早期改善均预示着后期改善,不过PHQ和HDRS的早期改善对<60岁的人(相对于≥60岁的人)的治愈更具预测性,而更高的基线IDS负担对≥60岁的人(相对于<60岁的人)未治愈更具预测性。这些结果表明,年龄对rTMS治疗TRD的疗效没有显著影响,不过在治疗期间,年轻和老年成人在症状负担评估方面,评定工具可能有所不同。