• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经双对向颊肌黏膜瓣行腭延长术后的言语结局。

Speech Outcomes After Palatal Lengthening Via Double Opposing Buccinator Myomucosal Flaps.

机构信息

From the Institute of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, SOBRAPAR Hospital, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 1;92(4):395-400. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003809.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003809
PMID:38527345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palatal lengthening is becoming a first-line treatment choice for cleft patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). As cleft palate-related surgical outcomes are age dependent, speech outcomes may be similarly affected by patient age at the time of treatment. The primary goal of this study is to determine whether there are age-related speech outcome differences when double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps are used as part of a palatal lengthening protocol and whether these outcome differences preclude utilization of this technique for specific patient age groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on consecutive nonsyndromic patients with VPI who underwent treatment using double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps at our hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients who completed the 15-month follow-up were stratified by age. Group A aged between 2 and 7 years (n = 14), group B aged 8 and 18 years (n = 23), and group C aged older than 18 years (n = 25) were included. Standardized perceptual speech evaluations and nasopharyngoscopy were performed. Hypernasality, soft palate mobility, and lateral palatal wall mobility were assessed both preoperatively and at a 15-month postoperative interval. Complications were also recorded. The χ2 test was used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

All of the age-stratified patient groups in this study showed significant improvement in hypernasality, soft palate mobility, and lateral wall mobility (P < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between the different patient age groups. Overall speech success was achieved in 69.4% of patients. Patients in group A achieved 78.6% speech success, patients in group B achieved 78.3% speech success, and patients in group C achieved 56% speech success, with no statistically significant differences being shown regarding speech success between the different patient age groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of age, palatal lengthening via double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps similarly improves speech outcomes.

摘要

背景

腭延长术已成为伴有腭咽闭合不全(VPI)的腭裂患者的一线治疗选择。由于腭裂相关手术结果与年龄有关,因此治疗时患者的年龄可能同样会影响语音结果。本研究的主要目的是确定在使用双对向颊肌黏膜瓣作为腭延长方案的一部分时,是否存在与年龄相关的语音结果差异,以及这些结果差异是否排除了该技术在特定年龄段患者中的应用。

方法

对 2014 年至 2021 年在我院接受双对向颊肌黏膜瓣治疗的 VPI 非综合征患者进行回顾性研究。完成 15 个月随访的患者按年龄分层。A 组年龄在 2 至 7 岁(n = 14),B 组年龄在 8 至 18 岁(n = 23),C 组年龄大于 18 岁(n = 25)。进行了标准化的感知语音评估和鼻咽镜检查。评估术前和 15 个月术后的鼻音、软腭活动度和侧腭壁活动度。还记录了并发症。使用 χ2 检验进行统计学比较。

结果

本研究中所有年龄分层的患者组在鼻音、软腭活动度和侧壁活动度方面均有显著改善(P < 0.01),不同患者年龄组之间无统计学差异。总体上有 69.4%的患者获得了成功的语音效果。A 组患者的语音成功率为 78.6%,B 组为 78.3%,C 组为 56%,不同患者年龄组之间的语音成功率无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

无论年龄大小,通过双对向颊肌黏膜瓣进行腭延长均可相似地改善语音结果。

相似文献

1
Speech Outcomes After Palatal Lengthening Via Double Opposing Buccinator Myomucosal Flaps.经双对向颊肌黏膜瓣行腭延长术后的言语结局。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 1;92(4):395-400. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003809.
2
Palatal lengthening by double opposing buccal flaps for surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft patients.腭裂患者腭部延长术:双颊侧对向瓣用于手术矫正腭咽闭合不全。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;48(10):977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
3
Buccinator myomucosal flap for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate and/or lip.颊肌黏膜瓣用于治疗腭裂和/或唇裂患者的腭咽闭合不全。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov-Dec;84(6):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Bilateral buccinator myomucosal flap outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with repaired cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.双侧颊肌黏膜瓣在非综合征性腭裂修复和腭咽闭合不全患者中的治疗效果
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Nov;70(11):1598-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Palate lengthening by buccinator myomucosal flaps for velopharyngeal insufficiency.使用颊肌黏膜瓣延长软腭治疗腭咽闭合不全
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Sep;50(5):e84-91. doi: 10.1597/11-211. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
6
Does speech improve after delayed palatal closure in Filipino adults? Effects of combined palatal repair, buccinator flaps and suspension pharyngeal flap.菲律宾成年人延迟腭裂修复术后语音会改善吗?腭裂修复术、颊肌瓣和咽后壁瓣联合应用的效果
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13146. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13146.
7
Improvement of quality of speech in patients with velo-pharyngeal insufficiency corrected using a buccinator myomucosal flap.使用颊肌黏膜瓣矫正腭咽闭合不全患者语音质量的改善
Ceylon Med J. 2016;61(3):130-134. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v61i3.8349.
8
Clinical outcomes of using bilateral buccinator myomucosal flaps in cleft lip and palate patient with velopharyngeal insufficiency: case report.在唇腭裂合并腭咽闭合不全患者中使用双侧颊肌黏膜瓣的临床结果:病例报告
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jun 9;47(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40902-025-00464-x.
9
Buccinator sandwich pushback: a new technique for treatment of secondary velopharyngeal incompetence.颊肌三明治后推术:一种治疗继发性腭咽闭合不全的新技术。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004 May;41(3):230-7. doi: 10.1597/02-146.1.
10
Speech outcome after palatal repair in nonsyndromic versus syndromic Robin sequence.非综合征型与综合征型 Robin 序列患者行腭裂修复术后的言语结局。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct;130(4):577e-584e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f2e4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of using bilateral buccinator myomucosal flaps in cleft lip and palate patient with velopharyngeal insufficiency: case report.在唇腭裂合并腭咽闭合不全患者中使用双侧颊肌黏膜瓣的临床结果:病例报告
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jun 9;47(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40902-025-00464-x.
2
Investigating the Effectiveness of Buccal Flap for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Systematic Review Article.颊瓣治疗腭咽闭合不全的有效性研究:一篇系统评价文章。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 10;14(8):2593. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082593.
3
MRI assessment of velopharyngeal dysfunction: A comprehensive primer for radiologists.
MRI评估腭咽功能障碍:放射科医生综合入门指南。
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 May;55(6):1088-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06180-y. Epub 2025 Feb 14.