Rikhof C J H, Feenstra Y, Fleuren J F M, Buurke J H, Prinsen E C, Rietman J S, Prange-Lasonder G B
Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede 7522AH, The Netherlands.
Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522NB, The Netherlands.
J Neural Eng. 2024 Apr 3;21(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad377c.
. The incidence of stroke rising, leading to an increased demand for rehabilitation services. Literature has consistently shown that early and intensive rehabilitation is beneficial for stroke patients. Robot-assisted devices have been extensively studied in this context, as they have the potential to increase the frequency of therapy sessions and thereby the intensity. Robot-assisted systems can be combined with electrical stimulation (ES) to further enhance muscle activation and patient compliance. The objective of this study was to review the effectiveness of ES combined with all types of robot-assisted technology for lower extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients.. A thorough search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. Relevant information regarding the interventions, devices, study populations, and more was extracted from the selected articles.. A total of 26 articles were included in the review, with 23 of them scoring at least fair on the methodological quality. The analyzed devices could be categorized into two main groups: cycling combined with ES and robots combined with ES. Overall, all the studies demonstrated improvements in body function and structure, as well as activity level, as per the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model. Half of the studies in this review showed superiority of training with the combination of robot and ES over robot training alone or over conventional treatment.. The combination of robot-assisted technology with ES is gaining increasing interest in stroke rehabilitation. However, the studies identified in this review present challenges in terms of comparability due to variations in outcome measures and intervention protocols. Future research should focus on actively involving and engaging patients in executing movements and strive for standardization in outcome values and intervention protocols.
中风的发病率不断上升,导致对康复服务的需求增加。文献一直表明,早期和强化康复对中风患者有益。在这种背景下,机器人辅助设备已得到广泛研究,因为它们有可能增加治疗疗程的频率,从而提高治疗强度。机器人辅助系统可与电刺激(ES)相结合,以进一步增强肌肉激活和患者的依从性。本研究的目的是综述ES与各种类型的机器人辅助技术相结合用于中风患者下肢康复的有效性。对同行评审的文章进行了全面检索。使用唐斯和布莱克清单的修改版评估纳入研究的质量。从所选文章中提取了有关干预措施、设备、研究人群等的相关信息。本综述共纳入26篇文章,其中23篇在方法学质量上至少为中等。所分析的设备可分为两大类:与ES相结合的自行车运动设备和与ES相结合的机器人设备。总体而言,根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类模型,所有研究均表明身体功能和结构以及活动水平有所改善。本综述中一半的研究表明,机器人与ES相结合的训练优于单独的机器人训练或传统治疗。机器人辅助技术与ES的结合在中风康复中越来越受到关注。然而,由于结局测量和干预方案的差异,本综述中确定的研究在可比性方面存在挑战。未来的研究应专注于积极让患者参与执行动作,并努力实现结局值和干预方案的标准化。