Del Blanco Muñiz Jose Ángel, Sánchez Sierra Alberto, Ladriñán Maestro Arturo, Ucero Lozano Roberto, Sosa-Reina María Dolores, Martín Vera Daniel
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Research Group on Exercise Therapy and Functional Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 11;15:1373912. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1373912. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this investigation was to compare the thickness of the deep local muscles in the neck region, as well as local and widespread sensitivity and functionality, between individuals with migraine, Tension-Type Headache (TTH), and healthy controls. To date, we know that the onset of migraine and TTH share similar pathophysiological pathways. Nevertheless, there may be some anatomical and functional differences which would explain why clinicians may obtain variable results when treating both pathological entities with similar or equal approaches.
An observational study was conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines. The flexor longus colli and multifidus, two neck-stabilizing muscles, were measured using B-mode ultrasound imaging. The upper trapezius, masseter, temporalis, tibialis anterior, and median nerve all underwent bilateral pressure-pain threshold (PPT) assessments.
Ninety participants were enrolled in the study. All subjects were equally divided into TTH, migraine and control groups. The PPT values exhibited lower thresholds in patients with TTH than both migraine and healthy participants. Specifically, in the temporal muscle on both sides, patients with TTH exhibited a significantly lower threshold ( < 0.001)than both migraine and healthy participants. Patients with TTH displayed significantly lower thresholds in both upper trapezius muscles (right: < 0.001; left: = 0.001). Similar results were obtained for the tibialis anterior PPTs from both sides ( = 0.001 in both). However, both clinical groups exhibited lower thresholds than the healthy subjects ( < 0.001). In multifidus muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), no statistically significant differences were found between migraine patients and healthy subjects, both in relaxation and contraction (right; > 0.05 and > 0.05; left: > 0.05 and > 0.05). However, patients with TTH exhibited a smaller CSA than both migraine patients and healthy controls in multifidus relaxed and contracted state (right: < 0.001 in both relaxed and contracted multifidus; left: = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Similar results were obtained for the left longus colli muscle in both relaxation and contraction for patients with TTH and migraine compared with healthy subjects ( = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively, for muscle relaxation and < 0.001 for muscle contraction). However, no significant differences were observed between patients with TTH and migraine ( < 0.05 in both relaxation and contraction). In the right longus colli, TTH and migraine patients had a significantly smaller CSA during contraction than healthy subjects ( < 0.001 in both comparisons). In the craniocervical flexion test, both groups of patients with TTH and migraine showed significantly lower values than healthy subjects ( < 0.001 in both comparisons). However, no significant differences were found between patients with TTH and migraineurs ( > 0.05).
The findings provide a significant message for clinicians since anatomical and functional impairments were shown in patients with TTH and migraine. This study corroborates a lack of strength and smaller CSA in both clinical groups compared to controls. Therefore, strengthening programs may be addressed successfully for people with these pathological entities. To be more accurate, according to PPTs and CSA lower values in patients with TTH compared to migraine and controls, manual therapy approaches to desensitize craniocervical soft tissues and exercise therapy to increase endurance of deep cervical muscles may become meaningful especially in subjects with TTH. Nevertheless, in order to distinguish precisely between patients with TTH and migraine, different diagnostic strategies may be used in the future to describe these populations in further detail, which will assist health professionals in a more accurate treatment selection.
本研究旨在比较偏头痛患者、紧张型头痛(TTH)患者和健康对照者颈部深层局部肌肉的厚度,以及局部和广泛的敏感性与功能。迄今为止,我们知道偏头痛和紧张型头痛的发病具有相似的病理生理途径。然而,可能存在一些解剖学和功能上的差异,这可以解释为什么临床医生在采用相似或相同方法治疗这两种病理情况时可能会得到不同的结果。
按照STROBE指南进行了一项观察性研究。使用B型超声成像测量两块颈部稳定肌肉——颈长屈肌和多裂肌。对上斜方肌、咬肌、颞肌、胫前肌和正中神经进行双侧压力疼痛阈值(PPT)评估。
90名参与者纳入了本研究。所有受试者均被平均分为紧张型头痛组、偏头痛组和对照组。紧张型头痛患者的PPT值阈值低于偏头痛患者和健康参与者。具体而言,在双侧颞肌中,紧张型头痛患者的阈值显著低于偏头痛患者和健康参与者(<0.001)。紧张型头痛患者双侧上斜方肌的阈值也显著更低(右侧:<0.001;左侧:=0.001)。双侧胫前肌的PPT也得到了类似结果(双侧均为=0.001)。然而,两个临床组的阈值均低于健康受试者(<0.001)。在多裂肌横截面积(CSA)方面,偏头痛患者与健康受试者在放松和收缩状态下均未发现统计学上的显著差异(右侧;>0.05且>0.05;左侧:>0.05且>0.05)。然而,紧张型头痛患者在多裂肌放松和收缩状态下的CSA均小于偏头痛患者和健康对照者(右侧:放松和收缩的多裂肌均<0.001;左侧:分别为=0.001和<0.001)。与健康受试者相比,紧张型头痛患者和偏头痛患者左侧颈长肌在放松和收缩状态下也得到了类似结果(肌肉放松时分别为=0.001和<0.001,肌肉收缩时<0.001)。然而,紧张型头痛患者和偏头痛患者之间未观察到显著差异(放松和收缩时均<0.05)。在右侧颈长肌中,紧张型头痛患者和偏头痛患者收缩时的CSA均显著小于健康受试者(两次比较均<0.001)。在颅颈屈曲试验中,紧张型头痛组和偏头痛组患者的值均显著低于健康受试者(两次比较均<0.001)。然而,紧张型头痛患者和偏头痛患者之间未发现显著差异(>0.05)。
这些发现为临床医生提供了重要信息,因为紧张型头痛和偏头痛患者存在解剖学和功能损害。本研究证实,与对照组相比,两个临床组均缺乏力量且CSA较小。因此,针对这些病理情况的人群,加强训练计划可能会取得成功。更准确地说,根据紧张型头痛患者与偏头痛患者及对照组相比PPT和CSA较低的值,使颅颈软组织脱敏的手法治疗方法以及增加颈部深层肌肉耐力的运动疗法可能会变得有意义,尤其是对于紧张型头痛患者。然而,为了精确区分紧张型头痛患者和偏头痛患者,未来可能会采用不同的诊断策略来更详细地描述这些人群,这将有助于健康专业人员更准确地选择治疗方法。