Konrad Kerstin, Gerloff Christian, Kohl Simon H, Mehler David M A, Mehlem Lena, Volbert Emily L, Komorek Maike, Henn Alina T, Boecker Maren, Weiss Eileen, Reindl Vanessa
Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
JARA Brain Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Mar 11;18:1286130. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1286130. eCollection 2024.
Interpersonal synchronization involves the alignment of behavioral, affective, physiological, and brain states during social interactions. It facilitates empathy, emotion regulation, and prosocial commitment. Mental disorders characterized by social interaction dysfunction, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), and Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), often exhibit atypical synchronization with others across multiple levels. With the introduction of the "second-person" neuroscience perspective, our understanding of interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) has improved, however, so far, it has hardly impacted the development of novel therapeutic interventions.
To evaluate the potential of INS-based treatments for mental disorders, we performed two systematic literature searches identifying studies that directly target INS through neurofeedback (12 publications; 9 independent studies) or brain stimulation techniques (7 studies), following PRISMA guidelines. In addition, we narratively review indirect INS manipulations through behavioral, biofeedback, or hormonal interventions. We discuss the potential of such treatments for ASD, RAD, and SAD and using a systematic database search assess the acceptability of neurofeedback (4 studies) and neurostimulation (4 studies) in patients with social dysfunction.
Although behavioral approaches, such as engaging in eye contact or cooperative actions, have been shown to be associated with increased INS, little is known about potential long-term consequences of such interventions. Few proof-of-concept studies have utilized brain stimulation techniques, like transcranial direct current stimulation or INS-based neurofeedback, showing feasibility and preliminary evidence that such interventions can boost behavioral synchrony and social connectedness. Yet, optimal brain stimulation protocols and neurofeedback parameters are still undefined. For ASD, RAD, or SAD, so far no randomized controlled trial has proven the efficacy of direct INS-based intervention techniques, although in general brain stimulation and neurofeedback methods seem to be well accepted in these patient groups.
Significant work remains to translate INS-based manipulations into effective treatments for social interaction disorders. Future research should focus on mechanistic insights into INS, technological advancements, and rigorous design standards. Furthermore, it will be key to compare interventions directly targeting INS to those targeting other modalities of synchrony as well as to define optimal target dyads and target synchrony states in clinical interventions.
人际同步涉及社交互动过程中行为、情感、生理和大脑状态的协调一致。它有助于产生同理心、情绪调节和亲社会承诺。以社交互动功能障碍为特征的精神障碍,如自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、反应性依恋障碍(RAD)和社交焦虑障碍(SAD),往往在多个层面上表现出与他人的非典型同步。随着“第二人称”神经科学观点的引入,我们对人际神经同步(INS)的理解有所改善,然而,到目前为止,它几乎没有影响到新型治疗干预措施的发展。
为了评估基于INS的治疗方法对精神障碍的潜力,我们按照PRISMA指南进行了两次系统的文献检索,以确定通过神经反馈(12篇出版物;9项独立研究)或脑刺激技术(7项研究)直接针对INS的研究。此外,我们对通过行为、生物反馈或激素干预进行的间接INS操作进行叙述性综述。我们讨论此类治疗方法对ASD、RAD和SAD的潜力,并通过系统的数据库搜索评估神经反馈(4项研究)和神经刺激(4项研究)在社交功能障碍患者中的可接受性。
尽管诸如进行眼神交流或合作行动等行为方法已被证明与INS增加有关,但对于此类干预措施的潜在长期后果知之甚少。很少有概念验证研究使用脑刺激技术,如经颅直流电刺激或基于INS的神经反馈,显示出此类干预措施可以提高行为同步性和社会联系的可行性和初步证据。然而,最佳的脑刺激方案和神经反馈参数仍未确定。对于ASD、RAD或SAD,到目前为止,尚无随机对照试验证明基于INS的直接干预技术的疗效,尽管总体而言,脑刺激和神经反馈方法在这些患者群体中似乎很容易被接受。
将基于INS的操作转化为社交互动障碍的有效治疗方法仍有大量工作要做。未来的研究应侧重于对INS的机制性见解、技术进步和严格的设计标准。此外,将直接针对INS的干预措施与针对其他同步模式的干预措施进行比较,以及在临床干预中确定最佳目标二元组和目标同步状态将是关键。