• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相性骨质流失与脱位距离

Bipolar bone loss and distance to dislocation.

作者信息

Herman Zachary J, Nazzal Ehab M, Keeling Laura, Reddy Rajiv P, Como Matthew, Hughes Jonathan D, Lin Albert

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Jt. 2024 Jan 5;9:7. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-17. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.21037/aoj-23-17
PMID:38529290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929361/
Abstract

Studies have shown that glenoid- and humeral-sided bone loss may be present in up to 73-93% of individuals with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. As such, bone loss must be addressed appropriately, as the amount of bone loss drives surgical decision making and influences outcomes. Methods to describe and measure bone loss have changed over time. Originally, glenoid and humeral bone loss were viewed separately. However, the concepts of bipolar bone loss, the glenoid track (GT), and "on/off-track" lesions arose, highlighting the interplay between the two entities in contributing to recurrent instability. Classically, "off-track" lesions have been described as those Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) greater than the GT, and have been shown to result in higher rates of re-instability when addressed nonoperatively or with Bankart repair alone. More recently, further attention has been given to "on-track" lesions (HSI < GT). The new concept of "distance to dislocation" (DTD) has gained popularity. DTD is calculated as the difference between the GT and HSI, and literature evaluating DTD suggests that not all "on-track" lesions should be treated in the same manner. The purpose of this concept review article is twofold: (I) describe glenoid, humeral, and bipolar bone loss in the setting of anterior shoulder instability; and (II) elaborate on the new concept of "DTD" and its use in guidance of management.

摘要

研究表明,在复发性前肩关节不稳的患者中,高达73% - 93%的个体可能存在肩胛盂和肱骨头侧的骨质流失。因此,必须妥善处理骨质流失问题,因为骨质流失的程度会影响手术决策并对治疗结果产生影响。描述和测量骨质流失的方法随时间发生了变化。最初,肩胛盂和肱骨头的骨质流失是分别看待的。然而,双极骨质流失、肩胛盂轨迹(GT)以及“脱轨/在轨”损伤等概念出现了,这突出了两者在导致复发性不稳方面的相互作用。传统上,“脱轨”损伤被描述为希尔 - 萨克斯间隙(HSI)大于GT的情况,并且已表明,非手术治疗或仅行Bankart修复时,这种损伤导致再发不稳的发生率更高。最近,人们对“在轨”损伤(HSI < GT)给予了更多关注。“脱位距离”(DTD)这一新概念受到了广泛关注。DTD的计算方法是GT与HSI之差,评估DTD的文献表明,并非所有“在轨”损伤都应以相同方式处理。这篇概念综述文章的目的有两个:(I)描述前肩关节不稳情况下的肩胛盂、肱骨头和双极骨质流失;(II)详细阐述“DTD”这一新概念及其在治疗指导中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/fc39da29ca97/aoj-09-7-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/09fe54a9e273/aoj-09-7-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/c34137971f7d/aoj-09-7-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/fc39da29ca97/aoj-09-7-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/09fe54a9e273/aoj-09-7-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/c34137971f7d/aoj-09-7-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a31a/10929361/fc39da29ca97/aoj-09-7-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Bipolar bone loss and distance to dislocation.双相性骨质流失与脱位距离
Ann Jt. 2024 Jan 5;9:7. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-17. eCollection 2024.
2
Remplissage reduces recurrent instability in high-risk patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions.填充术降低高危患者有轨道 Hill-Sachs 损伤的复发性不稳定。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6S):S99-S105. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Defining Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension as Predictor of Recurrent Instability After Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.定义关键肱骨骨缺失:下前后 Hill-Sachs 延伸作为初次关节镜 Bankart 修复后复发性不稳定的预测指标。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):181-189. doi: 10.1177/03635465231209443.
4
Distance to Dislocation and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Rethinking the Glenoid Track Concept.关节镜下Bankart修复术后脱位距离与复发性肩关节脱位:对肩胛盂轨迹概念的重新思考。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;50(14):3875-3880. doi: 10.1177/03635465221128913.
5
On-Track Lesions with a Small Distance to Dislocation Are Associated with Failure After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization.距关节脱位小距离的轨道病变与关节镜下前肩稳定术后失败有关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 2;103(11):961-967. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00917.
6
The effect of a combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs defect on glenohumeral stability: a biomechanical cadaveric study using 3-dimensional modeling of 142 patients.关节盂与希尔-萨克斯损伤合并对肩肱关节稳定性的影响:一项对142例患者进行三维建模的生物力学尸体研究
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1422-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515574677. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
"Nearly off-track lesions" or a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track does not seem to be accurate in predicting recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a military population: a case-control study.“近乎偏离轨道的损伤”或希尔-萨克斯损伤的内侧缘到关节盂窝轨道的内侧缘的短距离似乎并不能准确预测军事人群行关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的复发:一项病例对照研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Apr;32(4):e145-e152. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
Remplissage Versus Modified Latarjet for Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss.填充与改良 Latarjet 术治疗伴临界下盂骨缺损的非轨道 Hill-Sachs 损伤。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1885-1891. doi: 10.1177/0363546518767850. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Shoulder instability in the setting of bipolar (glenoid and humeral head) bone loss: the glenoid track concept.在存在双极(肩胛盂和肱骨头)骨质流失情况下的肩关节不稳:肩胛盂轨迹概念
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2352-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3589-7.
10
Bipolar bone defect in the shoulder anterior dislocation.肩关节前脱位中的双极骨缺损。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):479-88. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3927-7. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Hill-Sachs Lesion: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.希尔-萨克斯损伤:诊断、分类及治疗
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jul 10;60(2):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809339. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
[Hill-Sachs Lesion: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment].[希尔-萨克斯损伤:诊断、分类与治疗]
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jul 10;60(2):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809525. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability in quantifying the Hill-Sachs lesion: A scoping review.量化希尔-萨克斯损伤的变异性:一项范围综述。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Oct;15(5):465-483. doi: 10.1177/17585732221123313. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
2
First-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: current concepts.初次创伤性前肩脱位:当前的概念。
J ISAKOS. 2023 Apr;8(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
3
Classic Versus Congruent-Arc Latarjet Procedures.经典术式与一致性弧形Latarjet手术
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jan;39(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.016.
4
Distance to Dislocation and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Rethinking the Glenoid Track Concept.关节镜下Bankart修复术后脱位距离与复发性肩关节脱位:对肩胛盂轨迹概念的重新思考。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;50(14):3875-3880. doi: 10.1177/03635465221128913.
5
Comparison of computed tomography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating glenohumeral instability bone loss.对比 CT 与 3D-MRI 评估肩盂肱不稳的骨丢失。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Nov;31(11):2217-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
High correlation between inner and outer glenoid circle diameters and its clinical relevance.关节盂内、外圆周直径高度相关及其临床意义。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07050-y. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
Assessing Bone Loss in the Unstable Shoulder: a Scoping Review.评估不稳定肩关节的骨质流失:一项范围综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Oct;15(5):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09773-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
8
Evaluating Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability.评估前肩不稳的骨丢失。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun 15;30(12):563-572. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00016. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
9
MRI Allows Accurate Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss.MRI 可准确测量肩盂骨丢失量。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1731-1742. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002215. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bankart 修复术后复发的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 20;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w.