• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚建立机器人胰腺项目的安全性和可行性:病例系列和叙述性综述。

Safety and feasibility of instituting a robotic pancreas program in the Australian setting: a case series and narrative review.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

School of Medicine, Royal Brisbane Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2024 Jul-Aug;94(7-8):1247-1253. doi: 10.1111/ans.18998. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1111/ans.18998
PMID:38529778
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreatic resection has been gathering interest over the last decade due to the technical demands and high morbidity associated with these typically open procedures. We report our experience with robotic pancreatectomy within an Australian context.

METHODS

All patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy (DP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at two Australian tertiary academic hospitals between May 2014 and December 2020 were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients underwent robotic pancreatectomy during the study period. Thirty-four patients with a median age of 68 years (range 42-84) were in the PD group whilst the DP group included 28 patients with a median age of 60 years (range 18-78). Thirteen patients (46.4%) in the DP group had spleen-preserving procedures. There were 13 conversions (38.2%) in the PD group whilst 0 conversions occurred in the DP group. The Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complication rate was 26.4% and 17.9% in the PD and DP groups, respectively. Two deaths (5.9%) occurred within 90-days in the PD group whilst none were observed in the DP group. The median length of hospital stay was 11.5 days (range 4-56) in the PD group and 6 days (range 2-22) in the DP group.

CONCLUSION

Robotic pancreatectomy outcomes at our institution are comparable with international literature demonstrating it is both safe and feasible to perform. With improved access to this platform, robotic pancreas surgery may prove to be the turning point for patients with regards to post-operative complications as more experience is obtained.

摘要

背景

由于这些典型的开放性手术的技术要求高和高发病率,微创胰腺切除术在过去十年中引起了关注。我们报告了在澳大利亚背景下进行机器人胰腺切除术的经验。

方法

在 2014 年 5 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,在澳大利亚的两家三级学术医院,所有接受机器人胰远端胰腺切除术(DP)和胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的患者都被纳入本研究。

结果

在研究期间,有 62 名患者接受了机器人胰腺切除术。34 名中位年龄为 68 岁(范围为 42-84 岁)的患者行 PD 术,而 DP 组包括 28 名中位年龄为 60 岁(范围为 18-78 岁)的患者。DP 组中有 13 例(46.4%)患者行保脾手术。PD 组中有 13 例(38.2%)中转开腹,而 DP 组中无中转开腹。PD 组和 DP 组的 Clavien-Dindo 分级≥III 级并发症发生率分别为 26.4%和 17.9%。PD 组中有 2 例(5.9%)患者在 90 天内死亡,而 DP 组中无死亡病例。PD 组的中位住院时间为 11.5 天(范围为 4-56),DP 组为 6 天(范围为 2-22)。

结论

我们机构的机器人胰腺切除术结果与国际文献相当,证明其安全可行。随着对该平台的更好的了解,机器人胰腺手术可能会成为患者术后并发症的转折点,因为随着经验的增加,它可能会更具优势。

相似文献

1
Safety and feasibility of instituting a robotic pancreas program in the Australian setting: a case series and narrative review.澳大利亚建立机器人胰腺项目的安全性和可行性:病例系列和叙述性综述。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Jul-Aug;94(7-8):1247-1253. doi: 10.1111/ans.18998. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience.机器人辅助胰腺手术的作用:从我们最初的经验中吸取的教训。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Dec 15;16(6):652-658. doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60054-7.
3
Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison.机器人辅助与标准开放性胰腺切除术:倾向评分匹配分析比较
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0529-1. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.机器人辅助胰腺切除术
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2497-506. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3565-3.
5
Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction.机器人辅助下的胰腺大部切除术及重建术
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):256-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.246. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
6
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜与开腹胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌:胰体尾切除术和胰十二指肠切除术的独立倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08117-8.
7
Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术:标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1091-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6361-3. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.机器人单部位加 ONE 端口远端胰腺切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4258-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5476-2. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?最优胰腺手术:北美胰腺手术是否取得进步?
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e355-e363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628.
10
Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Benign and Low-Grade Malignant Neoplasms: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study with Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Pancreas Volumetry.胰腺中段切除术与胰远端切除术和胰十二指肠切除术治疗良性和低级别恶性肿瘤:一项回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究,具有长期功能结局和胰腺体积测量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1215-1224. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08095-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.