School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Wenzhou, China.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Mar 5;65(3):33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.3.33.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of monocular flicker stimulation on binocular imbalance in both amblyopic and nonamblyopic adults.
Seven amblyopic patients (28.3 ± 3.3 years; four females) and seven normally sighted participants (27.3 ± 4.1 years; five females) participated in the study. We used liquid crystal spectacles to create externally-generated monocular flicker (4, 7, 10, 15, or 20 Hz) and used the metric of log balance point (logBP) to determine whether imposed flicker could change the eyes' equilibrium interocular contrast ratio. Flicker was applied to either the fellow eye vs. the amblyopic eye or dominant eye (DE) vs. non-DE (non-DE) of amblyopic and nonamblyopic participants, respectively. We defined a logBP of 0 to indicate complete binocular balance and an increase in logBP relative to baseline to indicate a relative strengthening of the non-DE or amblyopic eye.
Monocular flicker applied to the DE or fellow eye increased logBP, whereas when applied to the non-DE or amblyopic eye, reduced the logBP. These effects were more pronounced at low temporal frequencies than that at high temporal frequencies. The interaction between eye and temporal frequency was significant in both normals, F(4, 24) = 58.082, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.906, and amblyopes, F(1.923, 11.538) = 60.555, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.91.
Monocular flicker diminishes the contribution of the flickered eye in binocular combination, resulting in a relative dominance of the nonflickered eye in interocular interactions. Furthermore, a more pronounced temporally modulated effect was observed at lower temporal frequencies.
本研究旨在评估单眼闪烁刺激对弱视和非弱视成年人双眼不平衡的影响。
七名弱视患者(28.3 ± 3.3 岁;女性 4 名)和七名正常视力者(27.3 ± 4.1 岁;女性 5 名)参与了这项研究。我们使用液晶眼镜产生外部生成的单眼闪烁(4、7、10、15 或 20 Hz),并使用对数平衡点(logBP)的度量来确定强制闪烁是否可以改变眼睛的平衡双眼对比度。闪烁分别施加于弱视眼的对侧眼或非弱视眼(非弱视眼),以及弱视眼和非弱视眼的优势眼(DE)。我们将 0 的 logBP 定义为完全双眼平衡,相对于基线增加的 logBP 表示非弱视眼或弱视眼的相对增强。
单眼闪烁施加于 DE 或对侧眼时增加了 logBP,而施加于非弱视眼或弱视眼时降低了 logBP。这些影响在低频时比高频时更为明显。在正常人和弱视者中,眼与时间频率之间的相互作用均有统计学意义,F(4, 24)= 58.082,P < 0.001,η2 = 0.906,F(1.923, 11.538)= 60.555,P < 0.001,η2 = 0.91。
单眼闪烁降低了闪烁眼在双眼组合中的贡献,导致非闪烁眼在眼间相互作用中相对占主导地位。此外,在较低的时间频率下观察到更明显的时间调制效应。