• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以公平为中心的出院后对医疗补助参保人群的支持:一项1型混合效果-实施阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验方案

Equity-Centered Postdischarge Support for Medicaid-Insured People: Protocol for a Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Brooks Carthon J Margo, Brom Heather, Grantham-Murrillo Marsha, Sliwinski Kathy, Mason Aleigha, Roeser Mindi, Miles Donna, Garcia Dianne, Bennett Jovan, Harhay Michael O, Flores Emilia, Amenyedor Kelvin, Clark Rebecca

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Penn Medicine at Home, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 26;13:e54211. doi: 10.2196/54211.

DOI:10.2196/54211
PMID:38530349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11005441/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in posthospitalization outcomes for people with chronic medical conditions and insured by Medicaid are well documented, yet interventions that mitigate them are lacking. Prevailing transitional care interventions narrowly target people aged 65 years and older, with specific disease processes, or limitedly focus on individual-level behavioral change such as self-care or symptom management, thus failing to adequately provide a holistic approach to ensure an optimal posthospital care continuum. This study evaluates the implementation of THRIVE-an evidence-based, equity-focused clinical pathway that supports Medicaid-insured individuals with multiple chronic conditions transitioning from hospital to home by focusing on the social determinants of health and systemic and structural barriers in health care delivery. THRIVE services include coordinating care, standardizing interdisciplinary communication, and addressing unmet clinical and social needs following hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE

The study's objectives are to (1) examine referral patterns, 30-day readmission, and emergency department use for participants who receive THRIVE support services compared to those receiving usual care and (2) evaluate the implementation of the THRIVE clinical pathway, including fidelity, feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability.

METHODS

We will perform a sequential randomized rollout of THRIVE to case managers at the study hospital in 3 steps (4 in the first group, 4 in the second, and 5 in the third), and data collection will occur over 18 months. Inclusion criteria for THRIVE participation include (1) being Medicaid insured, dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare, or Medicaid eligible; (2) residing in Philadelphia; (3) having experienced a hospitalization at the study hospital for more than 24 hours with a planned discharge to home; (4) agreeing to home care at partner home care settings; and (5) being aged 18 years or older. Qualitative data will include interviews with clinicians involved in THRIVE, and quantitative data on health service use (ie, 30-day readmission, emergency department use, and primary and specialty care) will be derived from the electronic health record.

RESULTS

This project was funded in January 2023 and approved by the institutional review board on March 10, 2023. Data collection will occur from March 2023 to July 2024. Results are expected to be published in 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

The THRIVE clinical pathway aims to reduce disparities and improve postdischarge care transitions for Medicaid-insured patients through a system-level intervention that is acceptable for THRIVE participants, clinicians, and their teams in hospitals and home care settings. By using our equity-focused case management services and leveraging the power of the electronic medical record, THRIVE creates efficiencies by identifying high-need patients, improving communication across acute and community-based sectors, and driving evidence-based care coordination. This study will add important findings about how the infusion of equity-focused principles in the design and evaluation of evidence-based interventions contributes to both implementation and effectiveness outcomes.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54211.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05714605; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05714605.

摘要

背景

有充分记录表明,患有慢性疾病且由医疗补助计划承保的人群在出院后的治疗结果存在差异,但缺乏减轻这些差异的干预措施。现有的过渡性护理干预措施范围狭窄,仅针对65岁及以上、患有特定疾病的人群,或仅侧重于个人层面的行为改变,如自我护理或症状管理,因此未能充分提供一种整体方法来确保最佳的出院后护理连续性。本研究评估了THRIVE(一项基于证据、注重公平的临床路径)的实施情况,该路径通过关注健康的社会决定因素以及医疗服务提供中的系统和结构障碍,支持患有多种慢性病的医疗补助计划参保者从医院过渡到家庭。THRIVE服务包括协调护理、规范跨学科沟通以及解决出院后未满足的临床和社会需求。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1) 与接受常规护理的参与者相比,检查接受THRIVE支持服务的参与者的转诊模式、30天再入院率和急诊科就诊情况;(2) 评估THRIVE临床路径的实施情况,包括保真度、可行性、适宜性和可接受性。

方法

我们将分三步对研究医院的病例管理人员进行THRIVE的序贯随机推广(第一组4人,第二组4人,第三组5人),数据收集将持续18个月。参与THRIVE的纳入标准包括:(1) 参加医疗补助计划,同时参加医疗补助计划和医疗保险,或符合医疗补助计划资格;(2) 居住在费城;(3) 在研究医院住院超过24小时且计划出院回家;(4) 同意在合作的家庭护理机构接受家庭护理;(5) 年龄在18岁及以上。定性数据将包括对参与THRIVE的临床医生的访谈,关于卫生服务使用的定量数据(即30天再入院率、急诊科就诊情况以及初级和专科护理)将从电子健康记录中获取。

结果

该项目于2023年1月获得资助,并于2023年3月10日获得机构审查委员会批准。数据收集将于2023年3月至2024年7月进行。预计结果将于2025年发表。

结论

THRIVE临床路径旨在通过一种系统层面的干预措施来减少差异并改善医疗补助计划参保患者出院后的护理过渡,该干预措施对于THRIVE参与者、临床医生及其在医院和家庭护理机构的团队来说是可接受的。通过使用我们注重公平的病例管理服务并利用电子病历的力量,THRIVE通过识别高需求患者、改善急性和社区部门之间的沟通以及推动基于证据的护理协调来提高效率。本研究将增加关于在基于证据的干预措施的设计和评估中融入注重公平的原则如何对实施和有效性结果产生影响的重要发现。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/54211。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05714605;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05714605

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b1/11005441/f1582e45e28c/resprot_v13i1e54211_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b1/11005441/c3191a9dd535/resprot_v13i1e54211_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b1/11005441/f1582e45e28c/resprot_v13i1e54211_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b1/11005441/c3191a9dd535/resprot_v13i1e54211_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b1/11005441/f1582e45e28c/resprot_v13i1e54211_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Equity-Centered Postdischarge Support for Medicaid-Insured People: Protocol for a Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.以公平为中心的出院后对医疗补助参保人群的支持:一项1型混合效果-实施阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 26;13:e54211. doi: 10.2196/54211.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
4
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
5
6
Translating research into practice: Protocol for a community-engaged, stepped wedge randomized trial to reduce disparities in breast cancer treatment through a regional patient navigation collaborative.将研究转化为实践:通过区域患者导航协作减少乳腺癌治疗差异的社区参与式、逐步楔形随机试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;93:106007. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106007. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Combined Digital Platform and Community Health Worker Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.数字平台与社区卫生工作者联合干预对心力衰竭患者的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 6;13:e55687. doi: 10.2196/55687.
9
Piloting a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Identify Patients With Social Needs and Provide Navigation Services and Referral to Community-Based Organizations: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.为识别有社会需求的患者并提供导航服务和向社区组织转介而试行临床决策支持工具:一项随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 23;13:e57316. doi: 10.2196/57316.
10
Improving TRansitions ANd outcomeS for heart FailurE patients in home health CaRe (I-TRANSFER-HF): a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial: study protocol.改善居家心脏衰竭患者的过渡与结局(I-TRANSFER-HF):1型混合型效果-实施试验:研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11584-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome.利用基线协变量分析罕见二分类结局的小型整群随机试验。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200135. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200135. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Transitional care innovation for Medicaid-insured individuals: early findings.医疗补助保险个人过渡护理创新:初步发现。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Aug;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001798.
3
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.在整群随机临床试验中的估算指标:选择回答正确问题的分析方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):107-118. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac131.
4
Evaluating Two Mysteries: Camden Coalition Findings.评估两个谜团:卡姆登联盟的调查结果。
NAM Perspect. 2020 Jul 27;2020. doi: 10.31478/202007d. eCollection 2020.
5
Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Patient Experience Of Care Among Nonelderly Medicaid Managed Care Enrollees.非老年医疗补助管理式医疗参保者的护理体验中的种族和民族差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):256-264. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01331.
6
Through An Equity Lens: Illuminating The Relationships Among Social Inequities, Stigma And Discrimination, And Patient Experiences of Emergency Health Care.透过公平视角:揭示社会不平等、污名化和歧视与急诊医疗患者体验之间的关系。
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Apr;52(2):246-260. doi: 10.1177/00207314221075515. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Human-Centered Design Innovation to Help All Patients THRIVE: An Interview With J. Margo Brooks Carthon.以人为本的设计创新,帮助所有患者茁壮成长:J.玛戈·布鲁克斯·卡顿访谈。
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Feb 1;52(2):71-72. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001105.
8
Access to post-acute care services reduces emergency department utilisation among individuals insured by Medicaid: An observational study.获得急性后期护理服务可减少医疗补助计划保险个人对急诊部门的利用:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Mar;31(5-6):726-732. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15932. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks.将健康公平领域纳入实施决定因素框架的更实用指南。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 5;2(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00146-5.
10
Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity.实施科学应该更加重视卫生公平。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0.