Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
We implemented a virtual observation unit in which emergency department (ED) patients receive observation-level care at home. Our primary aim was to compare this new care model to in-person observation care in terms of brick-and-mortar ED length of stay (inclusive of ED observation unit time) as well as secondarily on inpatient admission and 72-hour return visits (overall and with admission).
In a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data on ED observation patients from January 1, 2022 to December 29, 2022 from an academic urban ED, we used propensity matching to compare virtual to in-person observation patients on outcomes of interest. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and reason for observation. We also conducted real-time review of all virtual observation cases for potential safety concerns.
Of 8,218 observation stays, 361 virtual observation patients were matched with 361 in-person observation patients. Virtual observation patients experienced lower median brick-and-mortar ED + EDOU LOS [14.6 (IQR 10.2, 18.9) versus 33.3 (IQR 28.1, 38.1) hours] and lower inpatient admission rates (10.2% [SD 5.0] versus 24.7% [SD 11.3]). The 72-hour return rate was higher for virtual observation patients (3.6% [SD 3.0] versus 2.5% [SD 3.0]). Among those with return visits, the rate of inpatient admission was higher among virtual observation patients (53.8% [SD 3.2] versus 11.1% [13.0]). There were no significant patient safety events recorded.
Virtual observation unit patients used fewer hours in ED and ED observation relative to on-site observation patients. This new care delivery model warrants further study because it has the potential to positively impact ED capacity.
我们设立了一个虚拟观察单元,让急诊科(ED)患者在家中接受观察级别的护理。我们的主要目的是比较这种新的护理模式与传统的现场观察护理,比较指标包括实际 ED 停留时间(包括 ED 观察单元时间),以及次要指标包括住院和 72 小时内复诊(整体和入院)。
在对 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 29 日期间来自一所学术性城市 ED 的 ED 观察患者的电子健康记录数据进行回顾性分析中,我们使用倾向评分匹配比较虚拟和现场观察患者的感兴趣结局。根据年龄、性别、Charlson 合并症指数和观察原因,对患者进行 1:1 匹配。我们还对所有虚拟观察病例进行实时审查,以评估潜在的安全问题。
在 8218 例观察住院中,有 361 例虚拟观察患者与 361 例现场观察患者匹配。虚拟观察患者的实际 ED+EDOU 停留时间中位数更低[14.6(IQR 10.2,18.9)小时比 33.3(IQR 28.1,38.1)小时],住院率更低[10.2%(SD 5.0)比 24.7%(SD 11.3)]。虚拟观察患者的 72 小时复诊率更高[3.6%(SD 3.0)比 2.5%(SD 3.0)]。在复诊患者中,虚拟观察患者的住院率更高[53.8%(SD 3.2)比 11.1%(13.0)]。没有记录到明显的患者安全事件。
虚拟观察单元患者在 ED 和 ED 观察中使用的时间相对现场观察患者更少。这种新的护理提供模式值得进一步研究,因为它有可能对 ED 容量产生积极影响。