• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国肾脏分配修订方案对肾移植机会和结果的影响。

Impact of the Kidney Allocation Revision on Access to Kidney Transplantation and Outcomes in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Surgery Outcomes Research Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Jul;90(7):1886-1891. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241628. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1177/00031348241241628
PMID:38531806
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2014 Kidney Allocation System (KAS) revision aimed to enhance equity in organ allocation and improve patient outcomes. This study assesses the impacts of the KAS revision on renal transplantation demographics and outcomes in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study utilizing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (OPTN/SRTR) database from 1998 to 2022. We compared recipient and donor characteristics, and outcomes (graft failure and recipient survival) pre- and post-KAS revision.

RESULTS

Post-KAS, recipients were significantly older (53 vs 48, < .001) with an increase in Medicaid beneficiaries (7.3% vs 5.5%, < .001). Despite increased graft survival, HR = .91 (95% CI 0.80-.92, < .001), overall recipient survival decreased, HR = 1.06 (95% CI 1.04-1.09, < .001). KAS revision led to greater racial diversity among recipients and donors, enhancing equity in organ allocation. However, disparities persist in graft failure rates and recipient survival across racial groups.

DISCUSSION

The 2014 Kidney Allocation System revision has led to important changes in the renal transplantation landscape. While progress has been made towards increasing racial equity in organ allocation, further refinements are needed to address ongoing disparities. Recognizing the changing patient profiles and socio-economic factors will be crucial in shaping future policy modifications.

摘要

背景

2014 年肾脏分配系统(KAS)修订旨在提高器官分配的公平性并改善患者的预后。本研究评估了 KAS 修订对美国肾移植人口统计学和结果的影响。

方法

我们使用 1998 年至 2022 年期间的器官获取和移植网络/移植受者科学注册处(OPTN/SRTR)数据库进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了 KAS 修订前后的受者和供者特征以及结果(移植物失功和受者生存)。

结果

KAS 修订后,受者年龄明显更大(53 岁 vs 48 岁, <.001),医疗补助受益人的比例增加(7.3% vs 5.5%, <.001)。尽管移植物存活率增加,但 HR =.91(95%CI 0.80-0.92, <.001),整体受者生存率下降,HR = 1.06(95%CI 1.04-1.09, <.001)。KAS 修订导致受者和供者的种族多样性增加,从而增强了器官分配的公平性。然而,在种族群体中,移植物失功率和受者生存率仍然存在差异。

讨论

2014 年肾脏分配系统修订版导致了肾脏移植领域的重要变化。虽然在增加器官分配的种族公平性方面取得了进展,但需要进一步改进以解决持续存在的差异。认识到患者特征和社会经济因素的变化对于制定未来的政策调整至关重要。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Kidney Allocation Revision on Access to Kidney Transplantation and Outcomes in the United States.美国肾脏分配修订方案对肾移植机会和结果的影响。
Am Surg. 2024 Jul;90(7):1886-1891. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241628. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Outcomes After the 2014 Kidney Allocation System Change.2014 年肾脏分配系统改变后高致敏肾脏移植的结局。
Prog Transplant. 2024 Sep;34(3):70-80. doi: 10.1177/15269248241268697. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3
Trends in Disparities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation in the United States.美国抢先肾移植中差异的趋势。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Oct 7;14(10):1500-1511. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03140319. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
A2 to B Kidney Transplantation in the Post-Kidney Allocation System Era: A 3-year Experience with Anti-A Titers, Outcomes, and Cost.抗 A 抗体、结局和费用:后肾脏分配体系时代 A2 至 B 型肾移植的 3 年经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):635-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Posttransplant Outcomes for cPRA-100% Recipients Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新肾脏分配系统下 cPRA-100% 受者的移植后结局。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1456-1461. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002989.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting for deceased donor kidney transplantation 1 year after implementation of the new national kidney allocation system.新国家肾脏分配系统实施 1 年后,等待接受已故供体肾脏移植的种族/民族差异。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1936-1946. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14748. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Measuring and monitoring equity in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.衡量和监测公平获得已故供体肾移植的机会。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1924-1935. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14922. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Racial Disparities in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation under the New Kidney Allocation System in the United States.美国新肾脏分配系统下儿科肾脏移植中的种族差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Dec;16(12):1862-1871. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06740521. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
10
Retroactive application of the new kidney allocation system to renal transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era.新肾脏分配系统对在扩大标准供体/标准供体时代进行的肾移植的追溯应用。
Clin Transplant. 2015 Dec;29(12):1148-55. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12642. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Health insurance and kidney transplantation outcomes in the United States: a systematic review and AI-driven analysis of disparities in access and survival.美国的医疗保险与肾移植结果:一项关于获取医疗服务及生存率差异的系统评价和人工智能驱动分析
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2513007. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2513007. Epub 2025 Jun 9.