Suppr超能文献

减重手术翻修后的 5 年结果:胃束带术到袖状胃切除术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术。

Five-year outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery: gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

机构信息

Hartford Healthcare Surgical Weight Loss Center, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.

Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2719-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10764-4. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revisional bariatric surgery after an index adjustable gastric band (AGB) may be indicated to remedy weight relapse or band-related complications. We examined outcomes five years following revision from AGB to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (AGB-LSG) or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (AGB-RYGB).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review to identify patients (men and women, age 18-80) who underwent one revisional bariatric procedure with AGB as the index procedure at two medical centers in our healthcare system between January 2012 and February 2017. We only included patients with a pre-revision BMI > 30 kg/m for whom 5-year follow-up data were available. We compared 5-year weight loss and remission of comorbidities in patients undergoing AGB-LSG and AGB-RYGB conversion.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients met inclusion criteria (65 AGB-LSG, 49 AGB-RYGB). At 5-year post-revision, percent total weight loss (3.4% vs 19.9%; p < 0.001), percent excess weight loss (7.0% vs 50.8%; p < 0.001) and decrease in BMI (1.5 vs 8.8; p < 0.001) was greater in AGB-RYGB vs. AGB-LSG. No significant difference in remission or development of new comorbidities was observed.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of AGB to RYGB is associated with superior intermediate-term weight loss compared to conversion of AGB to LSG. Future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to further describe the intermediate-term outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery.

摘要

背景

对于指数可调胃带(AGB)后的减重手术修复,可能需要对体重反弹或与带相关的并发症进行治疗。我们研究了将 AGB 修正为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(AGB-LSG)或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(AGB-RYGB)后五年的结果。

方法

我们进行了回顾性研究,以确定在我们医疗系统中的两个医疗中心,在 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 2 月期间,接受过一次 AGB 作为指数手术的修正减重手术的患者(男性和女性,年龄 18-80 岁)。我们仅纳入了指数 AGB 前 BMI>30kg/m2且有 5 年随访数据的患者。我们比较了 AGB-LSG 和 AGB-RYGB 转换的患者 5 年的体重减轻和并发症缓解情况。

结果

共有 114 名患者符合纳入标准(65 名 AGB-LSG,49 名 AGB-RYGB)。在修正后 5 年时,总体重减轻百分比(3.4%对 19.9%;p<0.001)、多余体重减轻百分比(7.0%对 50.8%;p<0.001)和 BMI 降低(1.5 对 8.8;p<0.001)在 AGB-RYGB 中比在 AGB-LSG 中更大。在缓解或新并发症的发展方面,没有显著差异。

结论

与 AGB 到 LSG 的转换相比,AGB 到 RYGB 的转换与更优的中期减重相关。需要进一步进行具有更大样本量的多中心研究,以进一步描述修正性减重手术的中期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验