• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单阶段腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃束带失败后的安全性比较。

Safety of Single Stage Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass after Failed Gastric Banding.

机构信息

Bariatric Center of Excellence, Department of surgery, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Department of General, Oncologic, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):588-596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04975-6. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04975-6
PMID:32946032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7847865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reoperation, after failed gastric banding, is a controversial topic. A common approach is band removal with conversion to laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in a single-step procedure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the safety of revisional surgery to LSG compared to LRYGB after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) based on MBSAQIP Participant User File from 2015 to 2018.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a one-stage conversion of LAGB to LSG (Conv-LSG) or LRYGB (Conv-LRYGB) were identified in the MBSAQIP PUF from 2015 to 2017. Conv-LRYGB cases were matched (1:1) with Conv-LSG patients using propensity scoring to control for potential confounding. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 9974 patients (4987 matched pairs) were included in the study. Conv-LRYGB, as compared with conv-SG, was associated with a similar risk of mortality (0.02% vs. 0.06%; relative risk [RR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 3.20, p = 0.32). Conversion to LRYGB increased the risk for readmission (6.16% vs. 3.77%; RR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.37 to 1.94, p < 0.01); reoperation (2.15% vs. 1.36%; RR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.17 to 2.12, p = <0.01); leak (1.76% vs. 1.02%; RR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.72 to 2.42, p < 0.01); and bleeding (1.66% vs. 1.00%; RR, 1.66; 95%CI, 1.7 to 2.34, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that single-stage LRYGB and LSG as revisional surgery after gastric banding, are safe in the 30-day observation with an acceptable complication rate and low mortality. However, conversion to LRYGB increased the risk of perioperative complications.

摘要

背景

胃束带减肥术失败后的再次手术是一个备受争议的话题。一种常见的方法是在一次手术中切除束带,将其转换为腹腔镜 Roux-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)。

目的

本研究旨在根据 2015 年至 2018 年 MBSAQIP 参与者用户文件,评估胃束带减肥术失败后,将其转换为 LSG 与 LRYGB 进行再次手术的安全性。

方法

在 2015 年至 2017 年 MBSAQIP PUF 中,确定了将胃束带一次转换为 LSG(Conv-LSG)或 LRYGB(Conv-LRYGB)的患者。使用倾向评分对 Conv-LRYGB 病例进行 1:1 匹配,以控制潜在的混杂因素。主要结局为全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入 9974 例患者(4987 对匹配)。与 Conv-LSG 相比,Conv-LRYGB 的死亡率相似(0.02%比 0.06%;相对风险 [RR],0.33;95%置信区间 [CI],0.03 至 3.20,p=0.32)。转换为 LRYGB 增加了再入院(6.16%比 3.77%;RR,1.63;95%CI,1.37 至 1.94,p<0.01)、再次手术(2.15%比 1.36%;RR,1.57;95%CI,1.17 至 2.12,p=0.003)、漏(1.76%比 1.02%;RR,1.57;95%CI,1.72 至 2.42,p<0.01)和出血(1.66%比 1.00%;RR,1.66;95%CI,1.7 至 2.34,p<0.01)的风险。

结论

本研究表明,胃束带减肥术失败后的单阶段 LRYGB 和 LSG 再次手术在 30 天观察期内是安全的,并发症发生率可接受,死亡率低。然而,转换为 LRYGB 会增加围手术期并发症的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d8f/7847865/60f6b0f230bd/11695_2020_4975_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d8f/7847865/60f6b0f230bd/11695_2020_4975_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d8f/7847865/60f6b0f230bd/11695_2020_4975_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of Single Stage Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass after Failed Gastric Banding.单阶段腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃束带失败后的安全性比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):588-596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04975-6. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Safety of Revision Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Roux-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Gastric Banding: Analysis of the MBSAQIP.胃旁路术后翻修袖状胃切除术与胃束带术失败后胃旁路术安全性的比较:MBSAQIP 分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):299-303. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002559.
3
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?腹腔镜可调胃束带术失败后的转换:胃袖状切除术还是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
5
Single-stage revision from gastric band to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy: 6- and 12-month outcomes.从胃束带到胃旁路手术或袖状胃切除术的单阶段翻修术:6个月和12个月的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2244-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4498-x. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
6
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the pediatric population: a MBSAQIP analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在儿科人群中的比较:MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Failed Gastric Banding: One-Step or Two-Step Revisional Surgery?腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃束带失败:一步法还是两步法翻修手术?
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):646-653. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05027-9. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
8
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
9
A retrospective comparison of early results of conversion of failed gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass.胃束带术失败后转换为袖状胃切除术或胃旁路术早期结果的回顾性比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
10
Short-Term Outcomes of Conversion of Failed Gastric Banding to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Meta-Analysis.胃束带术失败后转换为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的短期疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3538-8.

引用本文的文献

1
From Bands to Bypasses: Navigating Safety of Band Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy.从束带到旁路:探讨带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术和单吻合口空肠回肠吻合术与袖状胃切除术的安全性。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2627-2633. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07340-z. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
2
Five-year outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery: gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.减重手术翻修后的 5 年结果:胃束带术到袖状胃切除术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2719-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10764-4. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as revisional bariatric procedures after adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective cohort study.
胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术作为可调胃束带减肥术后的翻修术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 21;408(1):441. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03174-y.
4
Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center.限制型手术后的翻修手术:一家三级中心的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7686-7697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10274-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
5
Long-Term Matched Comparison of Primary and Revisional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.长期匹配比较原发性和翻修腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。
Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):695-705. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06436-8. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Long-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after failed gastric band: a multicenter cross-matched cohort study.袖状胃切除术作为胃旁路术失败后的翻修术的长期疗效:一项多中心交叉匹配队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01182-5. Epub 2021 Oct 3.