Berron David, Glanz Wenzel, Clark Lindsay, Basche Kristin, Grande Xenia, Güsten Jeremie, Billette Ornella V, Hempen Ina, Naveed Muhammad Hashim, Diersch Nadine, Butryn Michaela, Spottke Annika, Buerger Katharina, Perneczky Robert, Schneider Anja, Teipel Stefan, Wiltfang Jens, Johnson Sterling, Wagner Michael, Jessen Frank, Düzel Emrah
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 26;7(1):79. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-00999-9.
Remote monitoring of cognition holds the promise to facilitate case-finding in clinical care and the individual detection of cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. In the context of Alzheimer's disease, this is particularly relevant for patients who seek medical advice due to memory problems. Here, we develop a remote digital memory composite (RDMC) score from an unsupervised remote cognitive assessment battery focused on episodic memory and long-term recall and assess its construct validity, retest reliability, and diagnostic accuracy when predicting MCI-grade impairment in a memory clinic sample and healthy controls. A total of 199 participants were recruited from three cohorts and included as healthy controls (n = 97), individuals with subjective cognitive decline (n = 59), or patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 43). Participants performed cognitive assessments in a fully remote and unsupervised setting via a smartphone app. The derived RDMC score is significantly correlated with the PACC5 score across participants and demonstrates good retest reliability. Diagnostic accuracy for discriminating memory impairment from no impairment is high (cross-validated AUC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.66, 0.99]) with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.72. Thus, unsupervised remote cognitive assessments implemented in the neotiv digital platform show good discrimination between cognitively impaired and unimpaired individuals, further demonstrating that it is feasible to complement the neuropsychological assessment of episodic memory with unsupervised and remote assessments on mobile devices. This contributes to recent efforts to implement remote assessment of episodic memory for case-finding and monitoring in large research studies and clinical care.
认知的远程监测有望促进临床护理中的病例发现以及临床和研究环境中认知障碍的个体检测。在阿尔茨海默病的背景下,这对于因记忆问题寻求医疗建议的患者尤为重要。在此,我们从一个专注于情景记忆和长期回忆的无监督远程认知评估电池中开发了一个远程数字记忆综合(RDMC)分数,并评估其在预测记忆诊所样本和健康对照中的轻度认知障碍(MCI)级损伤时的结构效度、重测信度和诊断准确性。总共从三个队列中招募了199名参与者,包括健康对照(n = 97)、主观认知下降个体(n = 59)或轻度认知障碍患者(n = 43)。参与者通过智能手机应用程序在完全远程且无监督的环境中进行认知评估。得出的RDMC分数在参与者中与PACC5分数显著相关,并显示出良好的重测信度。区分记忆损伤与无损伤的诊断准确性很高(交叉验证的AUC = 0.83,95% CI [0.66, 0.99]),敏感性为0.82,特异性为0.72。因此,在neotiv数字平台上实施的无监督远程认知评估在认知受损和未受损个体之间显示出良好的区分能力,进一步证明了用移动设备上的无监督远程评估来补充情景记忆的神经心理学评估是可行的。这有助于最近在大型研究和临床护理中为病例发现和监测实施情景记忆远程评估的努力。