• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合技术鸿沟:老年人数字脑健康研究中技术的 stigma 与挑战

Bridging the Technological Divide: Stigmas and Challenges With Technology in Digital Brain Health Studies of Older Adults.

作者信息

Nicosia Jessica, Aschenbrenner Andrew J, Adams Sarah L, Tahan Marisol, Stout Sarah H, Wilks Hannah, Balls-Berry Joyce E, Morris John C, Hassenstab Jason

机构信息

Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 29;4:880055. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.880055. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2022.880055
PMID:35574256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9098948/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased adoption of remote assessments in clinical research. However, longstanding stereotypes persist regarding older adults' technology familiarity and their willingness to participate in technology-enabled remote studies. We examined the validity of these stereotypes using a novel technology familiarity assessment ( = 342) and with a critical evaluation of participation factors from an intensive smartphone study of cognition in older adults ( = 445). The technology assessment revealed that older age was strongly associated with less technology familiarity, less frequent engagement with technology, and higher difficulty ratings. Despite this, the majority (86.5%) of older adults elected to participate in the smartphone study and showed exceptional adherence (85.7%). Furthermore, among those enrolled, neither technology familiarity, knowledge, perceived difficulty, nor gender, race, or education were associated with adherence. These results suggest that while older adults remain significantly less familiar with technology than younger generations, with thoughtful study planning that emphasizes participant support and user-centered design, they are willing and capable participants in technology-enabled studies. And once enrolled, they are remarkably adherent.

摘要

新冠疫情促使临床研究中更多地采用远程评估。然而,关于老年人对技术的熟悉程度以及他们参与基于技术的远程研究的意愿,长期存在的刻板印象依然存在。我们通过一项新颖的技术熟悉度评估(n = 342)以及对一项针对老年人认知的智能手机深入研究中的参与因素进行批判性评估(n = 445),来检验这些刻板印象的有效性。技术评估显示,年龄较大与技术熟悉度较低、使用技术的频率较低以及难度评分较高密切相关。尽管如此,大多数(86.5%)老年人选择参与智能手机研究,并表现出极高的依从性(85.7%)。此外,在已招募的参与者中,技术熟悉度、知识、感知难度以及性别、种族或教育程度均与依从性无关。这些结果表明,虽然老年人对技术的熟悉程度仍明显低于年轻一代,但通过精心的研究规划,强调对参与者的支持和以用户为中心的设计,他们愿意且有能力参与基于技术的研究。而且一旦参与,他们的依从性非常高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/3cd632ea9388/fdgth-04-880055-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/a4c51ec32c83/fdgth-04-880055-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/c91d4b81da81/fdgth-04-880055-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/e4e314d6eed5/fdgth-04-880055-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/83103d047a95/fdgth-04-880055-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/e426c36e6f64/fdgth-04-880055-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/ee20849af393/fdgth-04-880055-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/3cd632ea9388/fdgth-04-880055-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/a4c51ec32c83/fdgth-04-880055-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/c91d4b81da81/fdgth-04-880055-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/e4e314d6eed5/fdgth-04-880055-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/83103d047a95/fdgth-04-880055-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/e426c36e6f64/fdgth-04-880055-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/ee20849af393/fdgth-04-880055-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8fb/9098948/3cd632ea9388/fdgth-04-880055-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Bridging the Technological Divide: Stigmas and Challenges With Technology in Digital Brain Health Studies of Older Adults.弥合技术鸿沟:老年人数字脑健康研究中技术的 stigma 与挑战
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 29;4:880055. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.880055. eCollection 2022.
2
Experiences of a Community-Based Digital Intervention Among Older People Living in a Low-Income Neighborhood: Qualitative Study.低收入社区老年人基于社区的数字干预体验:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 25;7:e52292. doi: 10.2196/52292.
3
Digital technology usage among older adults with cognitive frailty: A survey during COVID-19 pandemic.认知衰弱老年人的数字技术使用情况:COVID-19大流行期间的一项调查
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 19;9:20552076231207594. doi: 10.1177/20552076231207594. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Insights Into the Use of a Digital Healthy Aging Coach (AGATHA) for Older Adults From Malaysia: App Engagement, Usability, and Impact Study.马来西亚老年人使用数字健康老龄化教练(AGATHA)的见解:应用参与度、可用性和影响研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 21;8:e54101. doi: 10.2196/54101.
5
The new role of nursing in digital inclusion: Reflections on smartphone use and willingness to increase digital skills among Chinese older adults.护理在数字包容中的新作用:关于中国老年人智能手机使用情况及提升数字技能意愿的思考
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Nov-Dec;48:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
Wearable Use in an Observational Study Among Older Adults: Adherence, Feasibility, and Effects of Clinicodemographic Factors.老年人观察性研究中的可穿戴设备应用:依从性、可行性及临床人口统计学因素的影响
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jun 10;4:884208. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.884208. eCollection 2022.
7
Understanding Technology Preferences and Requirements for Health Information Technologies Designed to Improve and Maintain the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: Participatory Design Study.了解旨在改善和维持老年人心理健康与幸福感的健康信息技术的技术偏好和需求:参与式设计研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Jan 6;4(1):e21461. doi: 10.2196/21461.
8
"If I want to be able to keep going, I must be active." Exploring older adults' perspectives of remote physical activity supports: a mixed-methods study.如果我想保持活力,我必须积极活动。探索老年人对远程体育活动支持的观点:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;12:1328492. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1328492. eCollection 2024.
9
Understanding older adults' attitudes toward mobile and wearable technologies to support health and cognition.了解老年人对支持健康和认知的移动及可穿戴技术的态度。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:1036092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036092. eCollection 2022.
10
Staying connected: smartphone acceptance and use level differences of older adults in China.保持联系:中国老年人对智能手机的接受程度和使用水平差异
Univers Access Inf Soc. 2022 Oct 13:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00933-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the evidence gap: exploratory insights into dual challenges of mild cognitive impairment and hematologic cancer in older adults through mixed methods and social listening study.填补证据空白:通过混合方法和社会倾听研究对老年人轻度认知障碍和血液系统癌症双重挑战的探索性见解
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01292-y.
2
Virtual Life Story Club Intervention to Improve Loneliness and Apathy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.虚拟生活故事俱乐部干预改善社区居住老年人的孤独感和冷漠感:一项混合方法可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 4;14:e70518. doi: 10.2196/70518.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Sharper in the morning: Cognitive time of day effects revealed with high-frequency smartphone testing.早晨更敏锐:高频智能手机测试揭示的认知时间效应。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct;43(8):825-837. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2021.2009447. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
2
Cognitive test scores vary with choice of personal digital device.认知测试分数因个人数字设备选择的不同而有所差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2544-2557. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01597-3. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
How Do Older Adults Recruited Using MTurk Differ From Those in a National Probability Sample?
A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.
对临床前阿尔茨海默病远程和无监督数字认知评估的范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 10;8(1):266. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01583-5.
4
Alzheimer disease seen through the lens of sex and gender.从性别视角看阿尔茨海默病。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 May;21(5):235-249. doi: 10.1038/s41582-025-01071-0. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
5
Acceptance of Unsupervised App-Based Cognitive Assessment in Outpatient Care: An Implementation Study.门诊护理中基于应用程序的无监督认知评估的接受度:一项实施研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 13;9:e62706. doi: 10.2196/62706.
6
Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni 1 Study: eCohort Study.电子弗明汉心脏研究子代队列及Omni 1研究中的基线智能手机应用程序调查回复情况:电子队列研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 31;7:e64636. doi: 10.2196/64636.
7
Bringing Care Close to Home: Remote Management of Heart Failure In Partnership with Indigenous Communities In Northern Ontario, Canada.将护理带到家门口:与加拿大安大略省北部原住民社区合作进行心力衰竭的远程管理。
CJC Open. 2024 Aug 27;6(12):1423-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.08.011. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Rationale and Design of a Study to Assess the Engagement and Usefulness of the Care4Today Connect Digital Health Application for Disease Management in Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease (iPACE-CVD Study).一项评估Care4Today Connect数字健康应用程序在冠状动脉疾病和外周动脉疾病疾病管理中的参与度和实用性的研究的基本原理与设计(iPACE-CVD研究)。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70039. doi: 10.1002/clc.70039.
9
Remote Monitoring and Virtual Appointments for the Assessment and Management of Depression via the Co-HIVE Model of Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences.通过联合式综合虚拟环境(Co-HIVE)护理模式对抑郁症进行评估和管理的远程监测与虚拟预约:一项关于患者体验的定性描述性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;12(20):2084. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202084.
10
A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.临床前阿尔茨海默病远程和非监督式数字认知评估的范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 25:2024.09.25.24314349. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.25.24314349.
使用 MTurk 招募的老年人与全国概率样本中的老年人有何不同?
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021 Sep;93(2):700-721. doi: 10.1177/0091415020940197. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants.远程数字健康研究中的留存指标:对10万名参与者的跨研究评估
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 17;3:21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0224-8. eCollection 2020.
5
Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study.运用技术接受模型探索患有多种慢性病的老年人对患者门户网站的用户体验、使用意愿和使用行为:描述性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 8;21(4):e11604. doi: 10.2196/11604.
6
Internet research in psychology.心理学中的网络研究。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:877-902. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
7
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE).预测技术使用情况的因素:来自老龄化与技术增强研究与教育中心(CREATE)的研究结果。
Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333-52. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
9
Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.我们应该信任基于网络的研究吗?关于网络问卷的六个先入之见的比较分析。
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):93-104. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93.
10
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.临床痴呆评定量表(CDR):当前版本及评分规则。
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a.