Mukit Muntazim, McCandless Martin G, Davidson John C, Hopper Samuel, Jabbour Jacob I, Davidson Stephen F, Walker Marc
Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54882. eCollection 2024 Feb.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate any changes to hand trauma in the past three decades and through the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that improved consumer safety regulations, changes in access to care, and the impact of a global pandemic, among other variables, have significantly influenced the mechanisms and treatment of hand injuries between the 1980s, 2010s (pre-COVID-19), and 2020s (post-COVID-19).
A retrospective single-center review was performed at the only level I trauma center in Mississippi, identifying all hand trauma consultations between 2012-2019 and 2020-2021, compared to aggregated data from 1989.
Car accidents, gunshots, saw injuries, door injuries, and falls increased in 2012-2019 and 2020-2021 compared to 1989, whereas knife injuries, glass injuries, industrial injuries, and burns decreased. Crush injuries, de-gloving injuries, and lacerations with irregular edges were increased in recent cohorts, corresponding with increased amputations and tissue loss. Skin and subcutaneous injuries decreased in modern cohorts, corresponding with a decreased ability for primary skin repair and the need for more flaps. Additionally, while hospitalizations have increased, patients have improved follow-up.
The nature of hand trauma has changed significantly over the past three decades. Increased numbers of cars and greater access to firearms might have led to increased rates of high-energy trauma, whereas burn and industrial injuries have decreased, potentially secondary to improved safety efforts. Despite increased overall hand trauma, time to treatment and follow-up have improved. Through this study, we can be more cognizant of the evolution of hand trauma in the modern era. This can allow improved access to care and further refine management to optimize functionality for hand injuries.
本研究的目的是评估过去三十年以及新冠疫情期间手部创伤的任何变化。我们假设,除其他变量外,消费者安全法规的改善、医疗服务可及性的变化以及全球大流行的影响,对20世纪80年代、2010年代(新冠疫情前)和2020年代(新冠疫情后)手部损伤的机制和治疗产生了重大影响。
在密西西比州唯一的一级创伤中心进行了一项回顾性单中心研究,确定了2012 - 2019年和2020 - 2021年期间所有的手部创伤会诊病例,并与1989年的汇总数据进行比较。
与1989年相比,2012 - 2019年和2020 - 2021年期间,汽车事故、枪伤、锯伤、门伤和跌倒导致的手部创伤有所增加,而刀伤、玻璃伤、工业伤和烧伤有所减少。近期队列中挤压伤、脱套伤和边缘不规则的裂伤有所增加,相应地截肢和组织缺损也有所增加。现代队列中皮肤和皮下损伤减少,这与一期皮肤修复能力下降以及对更多皮瓣的需求相对应。此外,虽然住院人数有所增加,但患者的随访情况有所改善。
在过去三十年中,手部创伤的性质发生了显著变化。汽车数量的增加和枪支获取的便利性增加可能导致了高能创伤发生率的上升,而烧伤和工业伤有所减少,这可能是安全措施改善的结果。尽管手部创伤总体上有所增加,但治疗时间和随访情况有所改善。通过这项研究,我们可以更清楚地认识现代手部创伤的演变。这有助于改善医疗服务可及性,并进一步优化管理,以最大限度地提高手部损伤的功能恢复。