Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
Chronic Disease Innovation Centre Seven Oaks General Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e030028. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030028. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of disease burden and death in the world. The medical fitness model may be an alternative public health strategy to address cardiovascular risk factors with medical integrated programming.
We performed a retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who did not have a prior major adverse cardiovascular event were included. Controls were assigned a pseudo-index date at random on the basis of the frequency distribution of start dates in the medical fitness facility group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and year of index date. We stratified the medical fitness facility group into low-frequency attenders (≤1 weekly visit) and regular-frequency attenders (>1 weekly visit). Our primary outcome was a hospitalization for nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death. We included 11 319 medical fitness facility members and 507 400 controls in our study. Compared with controls, members had a lower hazard risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event-plus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81-0.96]). Higher weekly attendance was associated with a lower hazard risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event-plus compared with controls, but the effect was not significant for lower weekly attendance (low-frequency attenders: HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.85-1.04]; regular-frequency attenders: HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.67-0.89]).
Medical fitness facility membership and attendance at least once per week may lower the risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event-plus. The medical fitness model should be considered as a public health intervention, especially for individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease.
心血管疾病仍然是世界上疾病负担和死亡的主要原因。医学健身模式可能是一种替代的公共卫生策略,可以通过医疗综合计划来解决心血管危险因素。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究时间为 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日。纳入的研究对象为没有既往重大不良心血管事件的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)。对照组基于医学健身机构组开始日期的频率分布,随机分配一个伪索引日期。多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型调整了年龄、性别、社会经济地位、合并症和索引日期的年份。我们将医学健身机构组分为低频率就诊者(每周就诊≤1 次)和常规频率就诊者(每周就诊>1 次)。我们的主要结局是因非致死性心肌梗死和卒中、心力衰竭或心血管死亡而住院。我们纳入了 11319 名医学健身机构成员和 507400 名对照组。与对照组相比,成员发生重大不良心血管事件的风险较低(风险比[HR],0.88[95%CI,0.81-0.96])。与对照组相比,更高的每周就诊频率与发生重大不良心血管事件的风险降低相关,但较低的每周就诊频率与风险降低无显著相关性(低频率就诊者:HR,0.94[95%CI,0.85-1.04];常规频率就诊者:HR,0.77[95%CI,0.67-0.89])。
医学健身机构会员资格和每周至少就诊一次可能会降低发生重大不良心血管事件的风险。医学健身模式应被视为一种公共卫生干预措施,尤其是对心血管疾病高危人群。