• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减轻健康与科学错误信息:对2017年至2022年文献的范围综述

Mitigating Health and Science Misinformation: A Scoping Review of Literature from 2017 to 2022.

作者信息

Heley Kathryn, Chou Wen-Ying Sylvia, D'Angelo Heather, Senft Everson Nicole, Muro Abigail, Rohde Jacob A, Gaysynsky Anna

机构信息

Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute.

ICF Next, ICF.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2025 Jan;40(1):79-89. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2332817. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2332817
PMID:38534199
Abstract

Literature on how to address misinformation has rapidly expanded in recent years. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the growing published literature on health and science misinformation mitigation interventions. English-language articles published from January 2017 to July 2022 were included. After title/abstract screening, 115 publications (148 empirical studies) met inclusion criteria and were coded for sample characteristics, topics, mitigation strategies, research methods, outcomes, and intervention efficacy. A marked increase in misinformation mitigation research was observed in 2020-2022. COVID-19, vaccines, and climate change were the most frequently addressed topics. Most studies used general population samples recruited online; few focused on populations most vulnerable to misinformation. Most studies assessed cognitive outcomes (e.g., knowledge), with fewer assessing health behavior, communication behavior, or skills. Correction (k = 97) was the most used misinformation mitigation strategy, followed by education and other literacy initiatives (k = 39) and prebunking/inoculation (k = 24). Intervention efficacy varied, with 76 studies reporting positive, 17 reporting null, and 68 reporting mixed results. Most misinformation mitigation interventions were limited to short-term online experiments focused on improving cognitive outcomes. Priority research areas going forward include expanding and diversifying study samples, scaling interventions, conducting longitudinal observations, and focusing on communities susceptible to misinformation.

摘要

近年来,关于如何应对错误信息的文献迅速增加。本范围综述的目的是综合日益增多的关于减轻健康和科学错误信息干预措施的已发表文献。纳入了2017年1月至2022年7月发表的英文文章。经过标题/摘要筛选,115篇出版物(148项实证研究)符合纳入标准,并针对样本特征、主题、减轻策略、研究方法、结果和干预效果进行了编码。2020 - 2022年,错误信息减轻研究显著增加。新冠疫情、疫苗和气候变化是最常涉及的主题。大多数研究使用在线招募的普通人群样本;很少有研究关注最易受错误信息影响的人群。大多数研究评估认知结果(如知识),评估健康行为、沟通行为或技能的研究较少。纠正(k = 97)是最常用的错误信息减轻策略,其次是教育和其他素养提升举措(k = 39)以及预辟谣/接种(k = 24)。干预效果各不相同,76项研究报告了积极结果,17项报告无效果,68项报告结果不一。大多数错误信息减轻干预措施仅限于关注改善认知结果的短期在线实验。未来的优先研究领域包括扩大和多样化研究样本、扩大干预规模、进行纵向观察以及关注易受错误信息影响的社区。

相似文献

1
Mitigating Health and Science Misinformation: A Scoping Review of Literature from 2017 to 2022.减轻健康与科学错误信息:对2017年至2022年文献的范围综述
Health Commun. 2025 Jan;40(1):79-89. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2332817. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review.社交媒体上健康类错误信息的流行情况-在新冠疫情之前、期间和之后的挑战和缓解措施:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e38786. doi: 10.2196/38786.
4
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
5
Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.社交媒体上关于气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息:范围综述的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 31;13:e59345. doi: 10.2196/59345.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation: protocol for a scoping review.干预措施以减轻 COVID-19 错误信息:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 30;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01917-4.
8
Interventions to mitigate vaping misinformation: protocol for a scoping review.减轻电子烟错误信息干预措施:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 9;11(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02094-0.
9
The Prevalence, Features, Influencing Factors, and Solutions for COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation: Systematic Review.新冠病毒疫苗错误信息的流行情况、特征、影响因素和解决方案:系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 11;9:e40201. doi: 10.2196/40201.
10
Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.干预措施以提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD015270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015270.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Digital Health Equity Audits in Preventing Harmful Infodemiology.数字健康公平审计在预防有害信息传播流行病学中的作用。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 May 30;5:e75495. doi: 10.2196/75495.
2
Exploring the role of culture and cognitive heuristics in assessing the credibility of cancer (mis)information on Facebook among U.S. Latinos/as.探究文化和认知启发法在美国拉丁裔群体中评估脸书上癌症(错误)信息可信度方面所起的作用。
Health Commun. 2025 May 1:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2498703.
3
Assessing the role of conspiracy beliefs in oncological treatment decisions: An experimental approach.
评估阴谋论信念在肿瘤治疗决策中的作用:一种实验方法。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Feb 25;17(1):e12615. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12615. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
The Resilience of Attitude Toward Vaccination: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial on the Processing of Misinformation.对疫苗接种态度的恢复力:关于错误信息处理的网络随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 4;8:e52871. doi: 10.2196/52871.