• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上关于气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息:范围综述的方案。

Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

机构信息

CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada.

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 31;13:e59345. doi: 10.2196/59345.

DOI:10.2196/59345
PMID:39481105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Climate change and related environmental events represent major global challenges and are often accompanied by the spread of misinformation on social media. According to previous reviews, the dissemination of this misinformation on various social media platforms requires deeper exploration. Moreover, the findings reported applied mainly to the context of the United States, limiting the possibility of extending the results to other settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the current state of knowledge about misinformation concerning climate change and related environmental events that are circulating on social media. More specifically, we will explore past and current themes, actors, and sources, and the dissemination of this misinformation within the Canadian context.

METHODS

This scoping review protocol follows the methodological approach developed by Arksey and O'Malley and advanced by Levac, complemented by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and the best practice guidance for the development of scoping review protocols. Following the identification of the research questions and assisted by a specialized librarian, we developed search strategies for selected bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and GreenFILE) and for gray literature (Google and pertinent databases) searches. Bibliographic and gray literature will be searched to identify relevant publications. In total, 2 members of our team will use the review software Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation) to independently select publications to include in the review. Publications specifically addressing our research questions, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and published from January 1, 2000, in the full-text version in English or French will be included. Data will be extracted from the included publications to chart, among other items, the years of publication, geographic areas, themes, actors, and sources of the climate change-related misinformation and conclusions reported. Our team will then synthesize the extracted data to articulate the current state of knowledge relating to our research inquiries.

RESULTS

The research questions were identified in January 2024. The search strategies were developed from January to March 2024 for MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science and in July 2024 for GreenFILE and gray literature. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science searches were launched on March 26, 2024. The first of 2 rounds of selection of publications identified through these databases was achieved in April 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol will enable us to identify the evolution of themes, actors, and sources of misinformation regarding climate change and related environmental events on social media, including the latest platforms, and to potentially identify a context particular to Canada. As misinformation is known to undermine actions and public support in the fight against climate change, we intend to facilitate the targeting of efforts to combat misinformation related to climate change in an up-to-date and contextualized manner.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/59345.

摘要

背景

气候变化和相关环境事件是全球性的重大挑战,往往伴随着社交媒体上错误信息的传播。根据之前的评论,各种社交媒体平台上错误信息的传播需要更深入的探讨。此外,报告的研究结果主要适用于美国的背景,限制了将结果推广到其他环境的可能性。

目的

本研究旨在评估当前有关在社交媒体上传播的气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息的知识状况。具体来说,我们将探讨过去和当前的主题、行为者和来源,以及这种错误信息在加拿大背景下的传播。

方法

本范围综述协议遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 制定的方法,并由 Levac 进行了补充,同时结合了 PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目清单)检查表和制定范围综述协议的最佳实践指南。在确定研究问题后,我们在专业图书馆员的协助下,为选定的书目数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 GreenFILE)和灰色文献(Google 和相关数据库)搜索制定了搜索策略。将对书目和灰色文献进行搜索,以确定相关出版物。我们团队的 2 名成员将使用综述软件 Covidence(Veritas Health Innovation)独立选择要纳入综述的出版物。将包括专门针对我们研究问题的、同行评议的、基于证据的、并于 2000 年 1 月 1 日在英文或法文全文版本中发表的出版物。将从纳入的出版物中提取数据,以绘制与我们研究查询相关的当前知识状况,其中包括发布年份、地理区域、主题、行为者和气候变化相关错误信息的来源以及报告的结论。然后,我们团队将综合提取的数据,阐明与我们研究询问相关的当前知识状况。

结果

研究问题于 2024 年 1 月确定。从 2024 年 1 月到 3 月为 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 制定了搜索策略,并于 2024 年 7 月为 GreenFILE 和灰色文献制定了搜索策略。于 2024 年 3 月 26 日启动了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 的数据库搜索。通过这些数据库进行的第一轮出版物选择已于 2024 年 4 月完成。

结论

本方案将使我们能够确定社交媒体上有关气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息的主题、行为者和来源的演变,包括最新平台,并有可能确定加拿大特有的背景。由于错误信息已知会破坏气候变化斗争中的行动和公众支持,我们打算以最新和上下文化的方式促进有针对性地打击与气候变化相关的错误信息的努力。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/59345。

相似文献

1
Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.社交媒体上关于气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息:范围综述的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 31;13:e59345. doi: 10.2196/59345.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Influence of social media and the digital environment on international migration of health workforce from low- and middle-income countries post COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.社交媒体和数字环境对 COVID-19 大流行后低中等收入国家卫生人力国际迁移的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):e087213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087213.
5
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review.社交媒体上健康类错误信息的流行情况-在新冠疫情之前、期间和之后的挑战和缓解措施:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e38786. doi: 10.2196/38786.
6
Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review.老年人健康促进和疾病预防的数字技术:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):e37729. doi: 10.2196/37729.
7
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
8
Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol.全球范围内的子宫肌瘤和非裔非洲人:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e085622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085622.
9
Exploring Online Health Information Seeking Behaviour (OHISB) among young adults: A scoping review protocol.探索年轻人的在线健康信息搜索行为(OHISB):一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e074894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074894.
10
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review.定义健康相关文献中的错误信息和相关术语:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 9;25:e45731. doi: 10.2196/45731.
2
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media.中文社交媒体中气候变化错误信息的语义特征描述。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):845-859. doi: 10.1177/09636625231166542. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
The effect of social network sites usage in climate change awareness in Latin America.社交网站的使用对拉丁美洲气候变化意识的影响。
Popul Environ. 2023;45(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11111-023-00417-4. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
Nurses' Perceptions of Climate Change: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护士对气候变化的认知:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 11;12:e42516. doi: 10.2196/42516.
5
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
6
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
7
Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land.围绕气候变化报告的争议:以推特对2019年政府间气候变化专门委员会关于土地的报告的回应为例
Clim Change. 2021;167(3-4):59. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03182-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
8
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.气候变化相关虚假信息及应对措施
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
We Need the Lens of Equity in COVID-19 Communication.我们需要在新冠疫情传播中运用公平视角。
Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1743-1746. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1837445. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.让公众免受关于气候变化的错误信息的影响。
Glob Chall. 2017 Jan 23;1(2):1600008. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201600008. eCollection 2017 Feb 27.