Cai Yunlong, Rao Xiaolong, Zhang Jixin, Liu Guanyi, Zheng Yiling, Yue Taohua, Nian Weidong, Rong Long
Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Pathology Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;14(6):597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060597.
We assessed the rapid on-line evaluation (ROLE) protocol as a modification to the conventional rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in the diagnostic performance improvement in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for solid pancreatic lesions. This single-center, retrospective study involved consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions undergoing EUS-TA at Peking University First Hospital between October 2017 and March 2021. Among 137 patients enrolled, 75 were in the ROLE group and 62 were in the non-ROSE group. The diagnostic yield (97.3% vs. 85.5%, = 0.023), accuracy (94.7% vs. 82.3%, = 0.027), and sensitivity (95.7% vs. 81.1%, = 0.011) were significantly higher in the ROLE group compared to the non-ROSE group. However, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) showed no significant differences (all -values > 0.05). Additionally, there was a noteworthy reduction in the number of needle passes required in the ROLE group compared to the non-ROSE group (two vs. three, 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, fine needle biopsy (FNB) combined with ROLE demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to FNB with non-ROSE (100% vs. 93.1%, = 0.025). Compared with the non-ROSE protocol, the ROLE protocol might improve the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA for solid pancreatic lesions, and potentially reduce the number of needle passes requirement.
我们评估了快速在线评估(ROLE)方案,该方案是对传统快速现场评估(ROSE)的一种改进,用于提高内镜超声引导下实体胰腺病变组织获取(EUS-TA)的诊断性能。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2017年10月至2021年3月期间在北京大学第一医院接受EUS-TA的连续实体胰腺病变患者。在137名入组患者中,75名在ROLE组,62名在非ROSE组。与非ROSE组相比,ROLE组的诊断率(97.3%对85.5%,P = 0.023)、准确率(94.7%对82.3%,P = 0.027)和敏感度(95.7%对81.1%,P = 0.011)显著更高。然而,特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积(AUC)无显著差异(所有P值>0.05)。此外,与非ROSE组相比,ROLE组所需穿刺针数显著减少(2次对3次,P < 0.001)。在亚组分析中,细针穿刺活检(FNB)联合ROLE的诊断准确率高于FNB联合非ROSE(100%对93.1%,P = 0.025)。与非ROSE方案相比,ROLE方案可能会提高EUS-TA对实体胰腺病变的诊断性能,并可能减少所需穿刺针数。