• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术快速现场评估由内镜医师在胰腺实性病变中的诊断价值:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;37(10):1975-1982. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15897. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15897
PMID:35614028
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the most established diagnostic method for pancreatic tissue. Rapid on-site evaluation by a trained endoscopist (self-ROSE) can improve the diagnostic accuracy. This research is aimed to analyze the application value of self-ROSE for EUS-FNA in solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

A total of 194 consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to EUS-FNA with or without self-ROSE in this single-center randomized controlled trial. Before initiating self-ROSE, the endoscopist underwent training for pancreatic cytologic sample adequacy assessment and cytopathological diagnosis of EUS-FNA in pathology department for 1 month. Some parts of the slides of EUS-FNA were air dried, stained on-site with BASO Liu's reagent, and on-site evaluated in self-ROSE group. Between the two groups, the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA was analyzed, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy, with a comparison of the number of needle passes and the complication rates.

RESULTS

The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94.8%, 94.4%, 100%, 100%, and 58.3% in the self-ROSE group, respectively, and 70.1%, 65.1%, 100%, 100%, and 32.6% in the non-self-ROSE group. The diagnostic accuracy (P < 0.001) and sensitivity (P < 0.001) were both significantly increased during EUS-FNA in the self-ROSE group compared to the non-self-ROSE group. The rate of cytologic sample adequacy was 100% in self-ROSE group and 80.4% in non-self-ROSE group. The number of passes were 3.38 ± 1.00 in self-ROSE group and 3.22 ± 0.89 in non-self-ROSE group (P = 0.228). No complications were found in both. There was acceptable consistency between endoscopist and pathologist in the cytopathological diagnosis (kappa = 0.666, P < 0.05) and in the sample adequacy rate (kappa = 1.000, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that self-ROSE is valuable for EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions and is an important choice to routinely increase the accuracy of EUS-FNA in centers without ROSE assessment.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)是目前诊断胰腺组织的最成熟方法。经过培训的内镜医生进行现场快速评估(自我 ROSE)可以提高诊断准确性。本研究旨在分析自我 ROSE 在胰腺实性病变 EUS-FNA 中的应用价值。

方法

这是一项单中心随机对照试验,共纳入 194 例南京鼓楼医院胰腺实性病变患者,按照 1:1 的比例随机分为 EUS-FNA 联合或不联合自我 ROSE 组。在开始自我 ROSE 之前,内镜医生在病理科接受了 1 个月的胰腺细胞学样本充足性评估和 EUS-FNA 细胞学诊断培训。EUS-FNA 的部分切片空气干燥后,用 BASO Liu 试剂现场染色,并在自我 ROSE 组进行现场评估。比较两组 EUS-FNA 的诊断性能,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率,并比较针数和并发症发生率。

结果

自我 ROSE 组的准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94.8%、94.4%、100%、100%和 58.3%,非自我 ROSE 组分别为 70.1%、65.1%、100%、100%和 32.6%。自我 ROSE 组的诊断准确率(P<0.001)和敏感性(P<0.001)均明显高于非自我 ROSE 组。自我 ROSE 组的细胞学样本充足率为 100%,非自我 ROSE 组为 80.4%。自我 ROSE 组的穿刺次数为 3.38±1.00 次,非自我 ROSE 组为 3.22±0.89 次(P=0.228)。两组均未发生并发症。内镜医生和病理医生在细胞学诊断(kappa=0.666,P<0.05)和样本充足率(kappa=1.000,P<0.001)方面具有可接受的一致性。

结论

本研究结果表明,自我 ROSE 有助于胰腺实性病变 EUS-FNA 的诊断,是提高无 ROSE 评估中心 EUS-FNA 准确性的重要选择。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术快速现场评估由内镜医师在胰腺实性病变中的诊断价值:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;37(10):1975-1982. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15897. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.内镜超声引导下对实性胰腺病变进行组织采集并联合或不联合快速现场评估:单中心五年经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(10):1185-1193. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204985. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.快速现场评估提高了内镜超声引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)对实性胰腺病变的敏感性,与技术无关:单中心经验。
Cytopathology. 2023 Jul;34(4):318-324. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13237. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术对胰腺实性病变的诊断能力及影响准确性的因素:日本大型单中心经验。
J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;48(8):973-81. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0695-8. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
5
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查(EUS-FNA)与内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断价值比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2151-2158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2151.
6
Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检时进行触摸印片细胞学检查,在评估胰腺实性病变方面,其样本质量和诊断率与标准内镜超声引导下细针抽吸标本相当。
Cytopathology. 2019 Mar;30(2):179-186. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12662. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: experience from a single center.超声内镜引导下细针抽吸术对胰腺占位性病变诊断准确性的快速现场评估的影响:单中心经验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 May 27;22(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02330-w.
8
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.内镜超声(EUS)引导下单纯细针活检与EUS引导下细针穿刺并进行快速现场评估用于胰腺病变的比较:一项多中心随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2022 Jan;54(1):4-12. doi: 10.1055/a-1375-9775. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声内镜引导下经皮细针穿刺抽吸术对胰腺实性病变的现场快速评估:一项随机对照试验。
Pancreas. 2021 Jul 1;50(6):815-821. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001846.
10
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.内镜超声引导下组织采集(EUS-FNA)与 EUS-FNB 对无 ROSE 的胰腺实性肿块的诊断性能:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 24;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02682-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriate use of tissue sampling and somatostatin receptor PET imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of an International Delphi Consensus.组织采样和生长抑素受体PET成像在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤诊断中的合理应用:一项国际德尔菲共识的结果
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11667-8.
2
Informatics strategies for early detection and risk mitigation in pancreatic cancer patients.胰腺癌患者早期检测和风险缓解的信息学策略。
Neoplasia. 2025 Feb;60:101129. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2025.101129. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Tissue Sampling: Lesion Assessment, Needles, and Techniques.
内镜超声引导下胰腺组织采样:病变评估、穿刺针及技术
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 7;60(12):2021. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122021.
4
Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.内镜超声引导下胰腺病变活检与经皮活检的比较评估:诊断性能的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 25;13(11):3108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113108.
5
Comparison of the diagnostic yield of rapid versus non-rapid onsite evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solid pancreatic lesions.在实性胰腺病变的内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查中,快速与非快速现场评估的诊断率比较。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):371-376. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0879. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
A Rapid On-Line Evaluation (ROLE) Protocol in the Diagnostic Performance Improvement in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.一种用于提高内镜超声引导下实性胰腺病变组织获取诊断性能的快速在线评估(ROLE)方案。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;14(6):597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060597.
7
Advances and efficacy in specimen handling for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy: A comprehensive review.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检标本处理的进展与疗效:全面综述
DEN Open. 2024 Mar 15;4(1):e350. doi: 10.1002/deo2.350. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检在实性胰腺病变诊断中不确定结果的危险因素及解读
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;13(17):2841. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172841.
9
Recent Developments in the Field of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声在胰腺病变诊断、分期及治疗领域的最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;15(9):2547. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092547.