• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳入项目特征的解释性认知诊断模型

Explanatory Cognitive Diagnosis Models Incorporating Item Features.

作者信息

Liao Manqian, Jiao Hong, He Qiwei

机构信息

Duolingo, Inc., 5900 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, Maryland Assessment Research Center (MARC), University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Mar 11;12(3):32. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030032.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12030032
PMID:38535166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10971092/
Abstract

Item quality is crucial to psychometric analyses for cognitive diagnosis. In cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), item quality is often quantified in terms of item parameters (e.g., guessing and slipping parameters). Calibrating the item parameters with only item response data, as a common practice, could result in challenges in identifying the cause of low-quality items (e.g., the correct answer is easy to be guessed) or devising an effective plan to improve the item quality. To resolve these challenges, we propose the item explanatory CDMs where the CDM item parameters are explained with item features such that item features can serve as an additional source of information for item parameters. The utility of the proposed models is demonstrated with the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)-released items and response data: around 20 item linguistic features were extracted from the item stem with natural language processing techniques, and the item feature engineering process is elaborated in the paper. The proposed models are used to examine the relationships between the guessing/slipping item parameters of the higher-order DINA model and eight of the item features. The findings from a follow-up simulation study are presented, which corroborate the validity of the inferences drawn from the empirical data analysis. Finally, future research directions are discussed.

摘要

项目质量对于认知诊断的心理测量分析至关重要。在认知诊断模型(CDM)中,项目质量通常根据项目参数(例如猜测和失误参数)进行量化。仅使用项目反应数据来校准项目参数,作为一种常见做法,可能会在识别低质量项目的原因(例如正确答案容易被猜出)或制定提高项目质量的有效计划方面带来挑战。为了解决这些挑战,我们提出了项目解释性CDM,其中CDM项目参数通过项目特征进行解释,以便项目特征可以作为项目参数的额外信息来源。通过国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)发布的项目和反应数据证明了所提出模型的效用:使用自然语言处理技术从项目题干中提取了大约20个项目语言特征,并在本文中详细阐述了项目特征工程过程。所提出的模型用于检验高阶DINA模型的猜测/失误项目参数与八个项目特征之间的关系。给出了后续模拟研究的结果,这些结果证实了从实证数据分析得出的推论的有效性。最后,讨论了未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03c/10971092/cb51088cf99d/jintelligence-12-00032-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03c/10971092/0f18320c3eb7/jintelligence-12-00032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03c/10971092/cb51088cf99d/jintelligence-12-00032-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03c/10971092/0f18320c3eb7/jintelligence-12-00032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03c/10971092/cb51088cf99d/jintelligence-12-00032-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Explanatory Cognitive Diagnosis Models Incorporating Item Features.纳入项目特征的解释性认知诊断模型
J Intell. 2024 Mar 11;12(3):32. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030032.
2
Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.针对随机猜测行为的认知诊断模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:570365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570365. eCollection 2020.
3
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment.2007年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数学评估认知诊断模型之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0188691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188691. eCollection 2018.
5
Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example.认知诊断评估的多层模型:多层DINA模型示例。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):34-50. doi: 10.1177/0146621618765713. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.一种考虑遗漏情况的二维多项选择模型
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02540. eCollection 2018.
8
Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.使用确定性输入、噪声与门(DINA)模型,对韩国医师执照考试各领域项目参数和考生掌握概率进行估计。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Polytomous Item Explanatory Item Response Theory Models.多分类项目解释性项目反应理论模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Aug;80(4):726-755. doi: 10.1177/0013164419892667. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.解释性认知诊断模型:纳入潜在和观察到的预测因素。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jul;42(5):376-392. doi: 10.1177/0146621617738012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Inferential Item-Fit Evaluation in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.认知诊断建模中的推断性项目拟合评估
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Nov;41(8):614-631. doi: 10.1177/0146621617707510. Epub 2017 May 19.
3
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
Mean centering helps alleviate "micro" but not "macro" multicollinearity.均值中心化有助于缓解“微观”而非“宏观”多重共线性。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1308-1317. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0624-x.
5
A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.应用于语言测试数据的通用诊断模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 Nov;61(Pt 2):287-307. doi: 10.1348/000711007X193957. Epub 2007 Mar 22.