• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格测试:加强对职业生涯中期士兵的在职选拔。

Personality testing: enhancing in-service selection of mid-career soldiers.

作者信息

Muhammad Rabiah S, Wolters Heather M K, Jayne Bradley S

机构信息

Workforce Assessment Branch, Transportation Security Administration, Arlington, Virginia.

Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):71-80. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1654294. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/08995605.2019.1654294
PMID:38536268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013306/
Abstract

Noncognitive attributes - notably personality - consistently predict important job-related outcomes for the Army (e.g., attrition, performance, disciplinary incidents) during Soldiers' first term of enlistment. Recently, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) has conducted research suggesting that personality measures can be used to improve person-job match and enhance performance beyond first term of enlistment. This paper summarizes recent research on the relationship between personality assessments and in-service job performance. This research is important because the duties of many Army in-service job assignments (e.g., Recruiter, Drill Sergeant, non-commissioned officer [NCO] Instructor, Special Operations) differ substantially from the type of work performed by the NCOs prior to such assignments, which renders moot the truism "the best predictor of future performance is past performance." The paper also offers a conceptual framework for future research, which can add value to multiple types of in-service assignment decisions.

摘要

非认知属性——尤其是个性——始终能够预测士兵入伍首年期间陆军中与工作相关的重要结果(例如,人员流失、绩效、违纪事件)。最近,美国陆军行为与社会科学研究所(ARI)开展的研究表明,个性测评可用于改善人与工作的匹配度,并在士兵入伍首年后提高绩效。本文总结了近期关于个性评估与在职工作绩效之间关系的研究。这项研究很重要,因为陆军许多在职工作任务(例如,征兵人员、 drill sergeant、士官[NCO]教官、特种作战)的职责与士官在此类任务之前所从事的工作类型有很大不同,这使得“未来绩效的最佳预测指标是过去绩效”这一老生常谈变得毫无意义。本文还为未来研究提供了一个概念框架,可为多种在职任务决策增添价值。

相似文献

1
Personality testing: enhancing in-service selection of mid-career soldiers.人格测试:加强对职业生涯中期士兵的在职选拔。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):71-80. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1654294. eCollection 2020.
2
Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter?美国陆军征兵人员态度和表现的预测因素:个性重要吗?
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):81-90. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486. eCollection 2020.
3
Attrition and reenlistment in the Army: Using the Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) to improve retention.陆军中的人员流失与再次入伍:运用定制化适应性人格评估系统(TAPAS)提高留用率
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):36-50. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652487. eCollection 2020.
4
Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process.适应性职业兴趣诊断:为工作分配过程提供信息并加以改进。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):91-100. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652480. eCollection 2020.
5
Optimism, Sociability, and the Risk of Future Suicide Attempt among U.S. Army Soldiers.乐观、社交能力与美国陆军士兵未来自杀企图的风险。
Mil Med. 2024 Jul 3;189(7-8):e1642-e1652. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad457.
6
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).军人自杀行为的流行率及其相关因素:来自军人风险与适应研究(Army STARRS)的结果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):514-22. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.30.
7
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
8
Role of Drill Sergeants in Nutrition Behaviors of Soldiers in Basic Combat Training.新兵训练营军士长在士兵基础战斗训练营养行为中的作用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Upstream suicide prevention in the U.S. Army: Noncommissioned officers' perspectives.美国陆军上游预防自杀:士官的观点。
Psychol Serv. 2024 Aug;21(3):435-443. doi: 10.1037/ser0000788. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
10
Validation of the TAPAS for predicting in-unit soldier outcomes.用于预测部队内士兵结局的TAPAS验证
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):24-35. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652484. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of performance by non-cognitive traits.通过非认知特质预测表现。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):127-134. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652479. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter?美国陆军征兵人员态度和表现的预测因素:个性重要吗?
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):81-90. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486. eCollection 2020.
2
Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.运用验证性因素分析和项目反应理论检测项目功能差异:迈向统一策略
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1292-306. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.
3
A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance.一种基于人格特质的工作绩效交互作用模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):500-17. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500.
4
The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.主观契合度认知的收敛效度和区分效度。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Oct;87(5):875-84. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875.
5
Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review.人格与绩效动机的关系:一项元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):797-807. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797.