• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PCI 术后院内死亡的原因和可预防因素:对 1163 例死亡病例的全州根本原因分析。

Cause and preventability of in-hospital mortality after PCI: A statewide root-cause analysis of 1,163 deaths.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Berne Cardiovascular Research Center and Heart and Vascular Center, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

Deparment of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0297596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297596. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297596
PMID:38536790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10971674/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality is the most devastating complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Identifying the most common causes and mechanisms of death after PCI in contemporary practice is an important step in further reducing periprocedural mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyze the cause and circumstances of in-hospital mortality in a large, multi-center, statewide cohort.

METHODS

In-hospital deaths after PCI occurring at 39 hospitals included in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) between 2012 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed using validated methods. A priori PCI-related mortality risk was estimated using the validated BMC2 model.

RESULTS

A total of 1,163 deaths after PCI were included in the study. Mean age was 71±13 years, and 507 (44%) were women. Left ventricular failure was the most common cause of death (52% of cases). The circumstance of death was most commonly related to prior acute cardiovascular condition (61% of cases). Procedural complications were considered contributing to mortality in 235 (20%) cases. Death was rated as not preventable or slightly preventable in 1,045 (89.9%) cases. The majority of the deaths occurred in intermediate or high-risk patients, but 328 (28.2%) deaths occurred in low-risk patients (<5% predicted risk of mortality). PCI was considered rarely appropriate in 30% of preventable deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality after PCI is rare, and primarily related to pre-existing critical acute cardiovascular condition. However, approximately 10% of deaths were preventable. Further research is needed to characterize preventable deaths, in order to develop strategies to improve procedural safety.

摘要

背景

死亡率是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)最具破坏性的并发症。在当代实践中,确定 PCI 后死亡的最常见原因和机制是进一步降低围手术期死亡率的重要步骤。

目的

系统分析大规模、多中心、全州范围内队列中 PCI 后住院期间死亡的原因和情况。

方法

使用经过验证的方法回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2014 年期间密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联合会(BMC2)的 39 家医院中发生的 PCI 后住院期间死亡的情况。使用经过验证的 BMC2 模型预先估计了与 PCI 相关的死亡风险。

结果

本研究共纳入 1163 例 PCI 后死亡。平均年龄为 71±13 岁,507 例(44%)为女性。左心室衰竭是最常见的死亡原因(52%的病例)。死亡的情况最常见的与先前的急性心血管状况有关(61%的病例)。在 235 例(20%)病例中,程序并发症被认为是导致死亡的原因。在 1045 例(89.9%)病例中,死亡被评为无法预防或略可预防。大多数死亡发生在中危或高危患者中,但 328 例(28.2%)死亡发生在低危患者(<5%预测死亡率)中。在可预防的死亡中,有 30%的 PCI 被认为不太合适。

结论

PCI 后住院期间死亡率较低,主要与先前存在的严重急性心血管状况有关。然而,约 10%的死亡是可以预防的。需要进一步研究可预防的死亡,以制定改善手术安全性的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/c67aafed7c91/pone.0297596.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/9b20b14855aa/pone.0297596.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/88a4d3f60c55/pone.0297596.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/c67aafed7c91/pone.0297596.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/9b20b14855aa/pone.0297596.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/88a4d3f60c55/pone.0297596.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/10971674/c67aafed7c91/pone.0297596.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cause and preventability of in-hospital mortality after PCI: A statewide root-cause analysis of 1,163 deaths.PCI 术后院内死亡的原因和可预防因素:对 1163 例死亡病例的全州根本原因分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0297596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297596. eCollection 2024.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion-The Michigan Experience: Insights From the BMC2 Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞:密歇根经验:BMC2 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1357-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
In-Hospital Death Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Root-Cause Analysis.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的院内死亡:根本原因分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40S:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
4
Cause and circumstance of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a root-cause analysis.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者院内死亡的原因及情况:根本原因分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):229-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963546. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Gender differences in adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous coronary intervention registry.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不良结局的性别差异:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟(BMC2)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记处的分析。
Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):677-683.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.040.
6
Causes of Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的死亡原因
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005355. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005355.
7
The epidemiology and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention before high-risk noncardiac surgery in contemporary practice: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) Registry.当代实践中高危非心脏手术前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的流行病学及结果:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟(BMC2)注册研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 May 12;3(3):e000388. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000388.
8
The comparative safety of abciximab versus eptifibatide in patients on dialysis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2).阿昔单抗与依替巴肽在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的透析患者中的比较安全性:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟(BMC2)的见解。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Aug;30(4):291-300. doi: 10.1111/joic.12388. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With a History of Cerebrovascular Disease: Insights From the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.有脑血管病史患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联合会的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006400.
10
Root Cause Analysis of Deaths in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions Treated With Primary PCI: What Can We Do Better?直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡原因分析:我们能做得更好的是什么?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 May;29(5):164-168. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Internet plus continuing nursing under dual heart medical model after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双心医学模式下“互联网 +”延续性护理的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042778.

本文引用的文献

1
In-Hospital Death Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Root-Cause Analysis.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的院内死亡:根本原因分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40S:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
Prevalence and Predictors of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (from the ORPKI National Registry in Poland).
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉穿孔的发生率及预测因素(来自波兰的 ORPKI 国家注册中心)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1186-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Causes of Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的死亡原因
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005355. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005355.
5
Trends in Contrast Volume Use and Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Collaborative (BMC2).接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的造影剂用量趋势及急性肾损伤发生率:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管协作组织(BMC2)的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):509-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.018.
6
Appropriateness and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Top-Ranked and Nonranked Hospitals in the United States.美国顶尖医院和非顶尖医院行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的适宜性和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 26;11(4):342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.042. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
7
A novel tool for reliable and accurate prediction of renal complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.一种用于可靠准确预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者肾并发症的新工具。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.026.
8
ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 冠状动脉血运重建的适当应用标准重点更新:美国心脏病学会基金会适当应用标准工作组、心血管血管造影和介入学会、胸外科医师学会、美国胸外科医师协会、美国心脏协会、美国核医学会和心血管计算机断层扫描学会的报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4):780-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.061.
9
Cause and circumstance of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a root-cause analysis.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者院内死亡的原因及情况:根本原因分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):229-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963546. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
10
How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care.密歇根的一家医院和医生区域合作组织如何降低成本并提高护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):636-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0526.