• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Peer Review Process.同行评审过程。
Respir Care. 2024 Mar 27;69(4):492-499. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11838.
2
Surviving peer review.通过同行评审。
J Clin Apher. 2020 Sep;35(5):469-476. doi: 10.1002/jca.21822. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.JACLP 稿件同行评审指南:如何进行同行评审以及如何回复评审意见。
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;64(5):468-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
CORP: Assessing author compliance with data presentation guidelines for manuscript figures.公司:评估作者对稿件图的数据呈现指南的遵守情况。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020 May 1;318(5):H1051-H1058. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00071.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Peer review of the biomedical literature.生物医学文献的同行评审。
Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;8(4):356-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90096-i.
6
How to review a scientific paper.如何评论一篇科学论文。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
7
Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.从作者和审稿人的角度改进同行评审过程。
Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 26;220(4):167-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.131.
8
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.为改进基金和期刊同行评审而进行的审稿人培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2.
9
Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars.利用同行评审过程教育和增强新兴护理学者的能力。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):488-492. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Key Guidelines for Responding to Reviewers.回复审稿人的关键指南。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 20;13:921. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154614.1. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Updates to CSE Recommendations for Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications: 7 Ways to Integrate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Into Scholarly Publishing.《科学编辑委员会(CSE)关于促进科学期刊出版诚信的最新建议:将多样性、公平性和包容性融入学术出版的7种方法》
Sci Ed. 2022 Oct 11;45(4):117-120. doi: 10.36591/se-d-4504-02.
2
How to Write an Effective Discussion.如何撰写有效的讨论部分
Respir Care. 2023 Nov 25;68(12):1771-1774. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11435.
3
How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Manuscript.如何撰写研究论文的方法部分
Respir Care. 2023 Nov 25;68(12):1763-1770. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11437.
4
Moving From Abstract to Manuscript.从摘要到手稿
Respir Care. 2023 Dec 28;69(1):139-144. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11370.
5
An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review.如何检索和撰写医学文献综述概述。
Respir Care. 2023 Nov;68(11):1576-1584. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11198. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Submitting a Manuscript to a Scientific Journal.向科学期刊投稿
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1314-1319. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11054. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians.如何进行系统评价和荟萃分析:临床医生指南。
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1295-1308. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10971. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Peer Review, Confidential Comments to the Editor, and the Golden Rule.同行评审、给编辑的保密意见以及黄金法则。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jan 1;90(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003320. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
9
Evidence-Based Respiratory Care.循证呼吸护理。
Respir Care. 2021 Jul;66(7):1105-1119. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08950. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
Why Participate in Peer Review?为什么要参与同行评审?
J Trauma Stress. 2021 Feb;34(1):5-8. doi: 10.1002/jts.22647. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

同行评审过程。

The Peer Review Process.

机构信息

Ms Willis is affiliated with Respiratory Care Services, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2024 Mar 27;69(4):492-499. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11838.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.11838
PMID:38538018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11108116/
Abstract

The purpose of peer review is to evaluate the scientific merit of the submitted work and to assess suitability for publication. This process is intended to provide an unbiased, independent critique to ensure publication of high-quality manuscripts that demonstrate validity and reliability. Reviewers are subject-matter experts who volunteer their time to participate in peer review. A proper review provides constructive and helpful feedback in a timely manner that authors can use to improve both current and future work. When given the opportunity to revise, authors should carefully consider all comments and adequately address all concerns. This paper provides guidance to clinicians for both aspects of the peer review process: participating as a reviewer and responding to reviewer feedback.

摘要

同行评审的目的是评估提交作品的科学价值,并评估其适合发表的程度。该过程旨在提供公正、独立的评估,以确保发表具有有效性和可靠性的高质量稿件。评审员是自愿参与同行评审的主题专家。适当的评审会及时提供建设性和有益的反馈,作者可以利用这些反馈来改进当前和未来的工作。有机会修改时,作者应仔细考虑所有意见,并充分解决所有问题。本文为临床医生提供了同行评审过程的两个方面的指导:作为评审员参与和回复评审员的反馈。