Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 27;14(1):7289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56484-6.
Iatrogenic stomach perforation is a detrimental, irreversible, and fatal condition. Traditional surgery and endoscopic suturing clips and devices have been introduced to seal holes and prevent sepsis and disease progression. However, the development of endoscopic devices for perforations remains challenging, with no standard device available. This study investigates the superficial layer approximation strengths of the newly designed ENDOCRAB system for gastric wall defects. Thirty porcine stomachs were prepared ex vivo for the perforation model and distributed equally into three groups: ENDOCRAB system, Through-the-Scope Clip (TTSC), and hand suturing (HS). Both ENDOCRAB and TTSC achieved mucosal-submucosal layer apposition, whereas HS allowed a full-thickness layer. Their air leakage pressure and procedural duration were measured. The analysis of air-leakage pressure demonstrated comparable suture strength between ENDOCRAB (118.5 ± 41.7 mmHg) and HS (127.4 ± 30.2 mmHg, P = 0.812), but inferior strength with TTSC (73.6 ± 21.6 mmHg, P = 0.012). HS achieved the shortest procedural duration, whereas ENDOCRAB and TTSC showed no significant differences. The ENDOCRAB system showed significantly greater strength than the TTSC, was comparable to HS in strength, and required a procedural duration similar to that of the TTSC. Furthermore, long-term in vivo experiments and histological evaluations are essential.
医源性胃穿孔是一种有害的、不可逆转的、致命的疾病。传统的手术和内镜缝合夹和器械已经被引入用于密封穿孔部位,以防止感染和疾病进展。然而,穿孔内镜治疗设备的发展仍然具有挑战性,目前尚无标准设备。本研究旨在评估新设计的 ENDOCRAB 系统治疗胃壁缺损的浅层近似强度。30 个猪胃被制备为穿孔模型,并平均分为三组:ENDOCRAB 系统组、经内镜夹(TTSC)组和手工缝合(HS)组。ENDOCRAB 和 TTSC 均实现了黏膜-黏膜下层的贴合,而 HS 则允许全层贴合。测量了它们的空气泄漏压力和操作时间。空气泄漏压力分析表明,ENDOCRAB(118.5±41.7mmHg)和 HS(127.4±30.2mmHg,P=0.812)之间的缝合强度相当,但 TTSC(73.6±21.6mmHg,P=0.012)的强度较差。HS 组的操作时间最短,而 ENDOCRAB 和 TTSC 组之间没有显著差异。ENDOCRAB 系统的强度明显大于 TTSC,与 HS 的强度相当,操作时间与 TTSC 相似。此外,还需要进行长期的体内实验和组织学评估。