• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring health and disease concepts in healthcare practice: an empirical philosophy of medicine study.探索医疗实践中的健康和疾病概念:一种经验主义的医学哲学研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 27;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01037-9.
2
Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics?伦理理论在生物伦理学中还有未来吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):209-17, 190. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00467.x.
3
An empirical perspective on moral expertise: Evidence from a global study of philosophers.从全球哲学家研究看道德专长的经验视角
Bioethics. 2022 Nov;36(9):926-935. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13079. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
What do you think of philosophical bioethics?你如何看待哲学生物伦理学?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr;24(2):139-48. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000449.
5
Pragmatism, metaphysics, and bioethics: beyond a theory of moral deliberation.实用主义、形而上学与生物伦理学:超越道德审议理论
J Med Philos. 2013 Dec;38(6):725-42. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht030. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Medical ethics research between theory and practice.医学伦理学在理论与实践之间的研究。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1998 Jun;19(3):263-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1009965900818.
7
Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference.实验哲学生命伦理学与规范推理。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):91-111. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09546-z. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
The Philosophical Basis of Bioethics.生物伦理学的哲学基础
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Sep;22(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
9
Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs.道德哲学与公共政策:以戒烟辅助药物为例。
Bioethics. 1993 Jan;7(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00268.x.
10
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.

本文引用的文献

1
Professionals' health conceptions of clients with psychosocial problems: An analysis based on an empirical exploration of semi-structured interviews.专业人员对有心理社会问题的客户的健康观念:基于半结构化访谈实证探索的分析
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 5;5:100120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100120. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Does disease incite a stronger moral appeal than health?疾病比健康更能引起强烈的道德诉求吗?
BMC Med. 2023 Nov 6;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03110-3.
3
Patient-centered empirical research on ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants - a scoping review.以患者为中心的关于人工耳蜗、青光眼和心血管植入物的伦理相关心理社会和文化方面的实证研究- 范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 28;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00945-6.
4
Clinician and patient perspectives on the ontology of mental disorder: a qualitative study.临床医生和患者对精神障碍本体论的看法:一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 12;14:1081925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1081925. eCollection 2023.
5
Preclinical Disease or Risk Factor? Alzheimer's Disease as a Case Study of Changing Conceptualizations of Disease.临床前疾病还是风险因素?以阿尔茨海默病为例看疾病概念的变化。
J Med Philos. 2023 Jun 20;48(4):322-334. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad009.
6
Managing the moral expansion of medicine.管理医学的道德扩张。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 22;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00836-2.
7
The concept of vulnerability in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.老年护理中的脆弱性概念:基于论证的伦理文献的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 16;23(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00819-3.
8
Looking forward to a decade of the biopsychosocial model.展望生物心理社会模型的十年。
BJPsych Bull. 2022 Jul 4;46(4):1-5. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.34.
9
Asking the right questions: towards a person-centered conception of shared decision-making regarding treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease in older patients.提出正确的问题:朝着以患者为中心的理念,共同决策治疗老年晚期慢性肾脏病患者。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Apr 27;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00784-x.
10
A plea for an experimental philosophy of medicine.对医学实验哲学的呼吁。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09551-2. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

探索医疗实践中的健康和疾病概念:一种经验主义的医学哲学研究。

Exploring health and disease concepts in healthcare practice: an empirical philosophy of medicine study.

机构信息

department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 27;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01037-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01037-9
PMID:38539209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10967067/
Abstract

In line with recent proposals for experimental philosophy and philosophy of science in practice, we propose that the philosophy of medicine could benefit from incorporating empirical research, just as bioethics has. In this paper, we therefore take first steps towards the development of an empirical philosophy of medicine, that includes investigating practical and moral dimensions. This qualitative study gives insight into the views and experiences of a group of various medical professionals and patient representatives regarding the conceptualization of health and disease concepts in practice and the possible problems that surround them. This includes clinical, epistemological, and ethical issues. We have conducted qualitative interviews with a broad range of participants (n = 17), working in various health-related disciplines, fields and organizations. From the interviews, we highlight several different practical functions of definitions of health and disease. Furthermore, we discuss 5 types of problematic situations that emerged from the interviews and analyze the underlying conceptual issues. By providing theoretical frameworks and conceptual tools, and by suggesting conceptual changes or adaptations, philosophers might be able to help solve some of these problems. This empirical-philosophical study contributes to a more pragmatic way of understanding the relevance of conceptualizing health and disease by connecting the participants' views and experiences to the theoretical debate. Going back and forth between theory and practice will likely result in a more complex but hopefully also better and more fruitful understanding of health and disease concepts.

摘要

与最近关于实验哲学和实践中的科学哲学的提议一致,我们提出医学哲学可以从实证研究中受益,就像生物伦理学一样。因此,在本文中,我们朝着发展一种包括实践和道德维度的经验医学哲学迈出了第一步。这项定性研究深入了解了一组不同的医疗专业人员和患者代表对健康和疾病概念在实践中的概念化以及可能围绕这些概念化的问题的看法和经验。这包括临床、认识论和伦理问题。我们对从事各种健康相关学科、领域和组织的广泛参与者(n=17)进行了定性访谈。从访谈中,我们强调了健康和疾病定义的几个不同的实际功能。此外,我们讨论了访谈中出现的 5 种有问题的情况,并分析了潜在的概念问题。通过提供理论框架和概念工具,并提出概念上的改变或调整,哲学家们或许能够帮助解决其中的一些问题。这项经验哲学研究通过将参与者的观点和经验与理论辩论联系起来,为更实际地理解健康和疾病概念的相关性做出了贡献。在理论和实践之间来回往复,可能会产生更复杂但希望也更好、更富有成效的健康和疾病概念理解。