department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 27;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01037-9.
In line with recent proposals for experimental philosophy and philosophy of science in practice, we propose that the philosophy of medicine could benefit from incorporating empirical research, just as bioethics has. In this paper, we therefore take first steps towards the development of an empirical philosophy of medicine, that includes investigating practical and moral dimensions. This qualitative study gives insight into the views and experiences of a group of various medical professionals and patient representatives regarding the conceptualization of health and disease concepts in practice and the possible problems that surround them. This includes clinical, epistemological, and ethical issues. We have conducted qualitative interviews with a broad range of participants (n = 17), working in various health-related disciplines, fields and organizations. From the interviews, we highlight several different practical functions of definitions of health and disease. Furthermore, we discuss 5 types of problematic situations that emerged from the interviews and analyze the underlying conceptual issues. By providing theoretical frameworks and conceptual tools, and by suggesting conceptual changes or adaptations, philosophers might be able to help solve some of these problems. This empirical-philosophical study contributes to a more pragmatic way of understanding the relevance of conceptualizing health and disease by connecting the participants' views and experiences to the theoretical debate. Going back and forth between theory and practice will likely result in a more complex but hopefully also better and more fruitful understanding of health and disease concepts.
与最近关于实验哲学和实践中的科学哲学的提议一致,我们提出医学哲学可以从实证研究中受益,就像生物伦理学一样。因此,在本文中,我们朝着发展一种包括实践和道德维度的经验医学哲学迈出了第一步。这项定性研究深入了解了一组不同的医疗专业人员和患者代表对健康和疾病概念在实践中的概念化以及可能围绕这些概念化的问题的看法和经验。这包括临床、认识论和伦理问题。我们对从事各种健康相关学科、领域和组织的广泛参与者(n=17)进行了定性访谈。从访谈中,我们强调了健康和疾病定义的几个不同的实际功能。此外,我们讨论了访谈中出现的 5 种有问题的情况,并分析了潜在的概念问题。通过提供理论框架和概念工具,并提出概念上的改变或调整,哲学家们或许能够帮助解决其中的一些问题。这项经验哲学研究通过将参与者的观点和经验与理论辩论联系起来,为更实际地理解健康和疾病概念的相关性做出了贡献。在理论和实践之间来回往复,可能会产生更复杂但希望也更好、更富有成效的健康和疾病概念理解。