Schulz Hannah H, Dijkstra Madelon, van der Lei Susan, Vos Danielle J W, Timmer Florentine E F, Puijk Robbert S, Scheffer Hester J, van den Tol M Petrousjka, Lissenberg-Witte Birgit I, Buffart Tineke E, Versteeg Kathelijn S, Swijnenburg Rutger-Jan, Meijerink Martijn R
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;16(6):1098. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061098.
The simultaneous presence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) and extrahepatic metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) can be considered a relative contraindication for local treatment with curative intent. This study aims to assess the survival outcomes of patients with CRLMs and extrahepatic metastases after comprehensive local treatment of all metastatic sites.
Patients with CRLMs who received local treatment of all metastatic sites were extracted from the prospective AmCORE registry database and subdivided into two groups: CRLM only vs. CRLM and extrahepatic metastasis. To address potential confounders, multivariate analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
In total, 881 patients with CRLM only and 60 with CRLM and extrahepatic disease were included, and the median OS was 55.7 months vs. 42.7 months, respectively. Though OS was significantly lower in patients with concomitant extrahepatic metastases (HR 1.477; 95% CI 1.029-2.121; = 0.033), the survival curve plateaued after 6.2 years. Extrahepatic manifestations were pulmonary (43.3%), peritoneal (16.7%) and non-regional lymph node metastases (10.0%). In patients with pulmonary and non-regional lymph node metastases, OS did not significantly differ from patients with CRLM-only disease; concomitant peritoneal metastases showed an inferior OS (HR 1.976; 95% CI 1.017-3.841, = 0.041).
In this comparative series, OS was inferior for patients with multi-organ metastatic CRC versus patients with CRLMs alone. Nonetheless, the long-term survival curve plateau seemed to justify local treatment in a subset of patients with multi-organ metastatic CRC, especially for patients with CRLMs and pulmonary or lymph node metastases.
结直肠癌(CRC)患者同时存在结直肠肝转移(CRLMs)和肝外转移可被视为根治性局部治疗的相对禁忌证。本研究旨在评估所有转移部位接受综合局部治疗后CRLMs和肝外转移患者的生存结局。
从前瞻性AmCORE注册数据库中提取接受所有转移部位局部治疗的CRLMs患者,并分为两组:仅CRLM组与CRLM和肝外转移组。为解决潜在混杂因素,进行了多因素分析。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。
共纳入881例仅CRLM患者和60例CRLM合并肝外疾病患者,中位OS分别为55.7个月和42.7个月。尽管合并肝外转移患者的OS显著较低(HR 1.477;95%CI 1.029 - 2.121;P = 0.033),但生存曲线在6.2年后趋于平稳。肝外表现为肺部(43.3%)、腹膜(16.7%)和非区域淋巴结转移(10.0%)。在肺部和非区域淋巴结转移患者中,OS与仅CRLM疾病患者无显著差异;合并腹膜转移患者的OS较差(HR 1.976;95%CI 1.017 - 3.841,P = 0.041)。
在本比较系列研究中,多器官转移CRC患者的OS低于仅CRLMs患者。尽管如此,长期生存曲线趋于平稳似乎证明对一部分多器官转移CRC患者进行局部治疗是合理的,特别是对于CRLMs合并肺部或淋巴结转移的患者。