Kupczynski Marian
Département de l'Informatique et d'Ingénierie, Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO), Case Postale 1250, Succursale Hull, Gatineau, QC J8X 3X7, Canada.
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;26(3):191. doi: 10.3390/e26030191.
In his article in Science, Nicolas Gisin claimed that quantum correlations emerge from outside space-time. We explainthat they are due to space-time symmetries. This paper is a critical review of metaphysical conclusions found in many recent articles. It advocates the importance of , Einstein -causality and global symmetries. Bell tests allow only rejecting probabilistic coupling provided by a local hidden variable model, but they do not justify metaphysical speculations about quantum nonlocality and objects which know about each other's state, even when separated by large distances. The violation of Bell inequalities in physics and in cognitive science can be explained using the notion of Bohr- . If contextual variables, describing varying experimental contexts, are correctly incorporated into a probabilistic model, then the Bell-CHSH inequalities cannot be proven and nonlocal correlations may be explained in an intuitive way. We also elucidate the meaning of assumption incorrectly called , . Since correlation does not imply causation, the violation of should be called ; it does not restrict the experimenter's freedom of choice. Therefore, contrary to what is believed, closing the does not close the
在尼古拉斯·吉辛发表于《科学》杂志的文章中，他声称量子关联源自时空之外。我们解释说它们是由于时空对称性。本文是对许多近期文章中形而上学结论的批判性综述。它倡导爱因斯坦因果性和全局对称性的重要性。贝尔测试仅允许拒绝局部隐变量模型提供的概率性耦合，但它们并不能为关于量子非局域性以及即使相隔很远仍能知晓彼此状态的物体的形而上学推测提供依据。物理学和认知科学中贝尔不等式的违反情况可以用玻尔的概念来解释。如果将描述不同实验情境的情境变量正确纳入概率模型，那么贝尔 - 克劳泽 - 霍恩 - 希米尼不等式就无法被证明，并且非局域关联可以用直观的方式来解释。我们还阐明了被错误称为“自由意志定理”的假设的含义。由于关联并不意味着因果关系，对“自由选择”的违反应该被称为“自由选择的丧失”；它并不限制实验者的选择自由。因此，与人们所认为的相反，消除“自由选择”并不会消除…… （原文此处似乎不完整）
