Kamata Shotaro, Honda Akihiro, Kashiwagi Nonoka, Shimamura Ayumi, Yashiro Sayaka, Komori Yuna, Hosoda Aoi, Akahoshi Noriyuki, Ishii Isao
Department of Health Chemistry, Showa Pharmaceutical University, Machida 194-8543, Tokyo, Japan.
Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 11;12(3):624. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030624.
Three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor subtypes, PPARα, PPAR(ß/)δ, and PPARγ, exert ligand-dependent transcriptional control in concert with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) on various gene sets harboring PPAR response elements (PPREs) in their promoter regions. Ligand-bound PPAR/RXR complexes do not directly regulate transcription; instead, they recruit multiprotein coactivator complexes to specific genomic regulatory loci to cooperatively activate gene transcription. Several coactivators are expressed in a single cell; however, a ligand-bound PPAR can be associated with only one coactivator through a consensus LXXLL motif. Therefore, altered gene transcription induced by PPAR subtypes/agonists may be attributed to the recruitment of various coactivator species. Using a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay, we analyzed the recruitment of four coactivator peptides (PGC1α, CBP, SRC1, and TRAP220) to human PPARα/δ/γ-ligand-binding domains (LBDs) using eight PPAR dual/pan agonists (bezafibrate, fenofibric acid, pemafibrate, pioglitazone, elafibranor, lanifibranor, saroglitazar, and seladelpar) that are/were anticipated to treat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. These agonists all recruited four coactivators to PPARα/γ-LBD with varying potencies and efficacy. Only five agonists (bezafibrate, pemafibrate, elafibranor, lanifibranor, and seladelpar) recruited all four coactivators to PPARδ-LBD, and their concentration-dependent responses differed from those of PPARα/γ-LBD. These results indicate that altered gene expression through consensus PPREs by different PPAR subtypes/agonists may be caused, in part, by different coactivators, which may be responsible for the unique pharmacological properties of these PPAR agonists.
三种过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体亚型,即PPARα、PPAR(β/δ)和PPARγ,与视黄酸X受体(RXRs)协同对其启动子区域含有PPAR反应元件(PPREs)的各种基因集发挥配体依赖性转录调控作用。配体结合的PPAR/RXR复合物并不直接调控转录;相反,它们招募多蛋白共激活因子复合物至特定的基因组调控位点以协同激活基因转录。几种共激活因子在单个细胞中表达;然而,配体结合的PPAR只能通过共有LXXLL基序与一种共激活因子相关联。因此,PPAR亚型/激动剂诱导的基因转录改变可能归因于各种共激活因子种类的招募。我们使用时间分辨荧光共振能量转移分析,利用8种预计用于治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的PPAR双重/泛激动剂(苯扎贝特、非诺贝特酸、匹伐贝特、吡格列酮、依拉 fibranor、拉尼 fibranor、沙罗格列扎和塞拉达帕)分析了四种共激活因子肽(PGC1α、CBP、SRC1和TRAP220)与人PPARα/δ/γ配体结合域(LBDs)的招募情况。这些激动剂均以不同的效力和效果将四种共激活因子招募至PPARα/γ-LBD。只有五种激动剂(苯扎贝特、匹伐贝特、依拉fibranor、拉尼fibranor和塞拉达帕)将所有四种共激活因子招募至PPARδ-LBD,且它们的浓度依赖性反应与PPARα/γ-LBD不同。这些结果表明,不同的PPAR亚型/激动剂通过共有PPREs导致的基因表达改变可能部分是由不同的共激活因子引起的,这可能是这些PPAR激动剂独特药理特性的原因。