Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Department of Rehabilitation, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 17;60(3):494. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030494.
Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) frequently necessitates respiratory support. While non-invasive methods are typically the preferred approach, mechanical ventilation becomes necessary for patients with insufficient response. Our study aimed to compare two common respiratory support modes, volume-targeted mechanical ventilation and non-invasive ventilation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), using electrical impedance tomography. : Infants with very low birth weight and gestational ages of less than 32 weeks were eligible for inclusion in the study. All enrolled infants were beyond the transitional period (>72 h of age). The infants were divided into two groups: infants receiving invasive respiratory support through an endotracheal tube and infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. We used electrical impedance tomography to assess end-expiratory lung impedance (EELZ), DeltaZ, heterogeneity, and regional ventilation distribution. Patients were evaluated at 0, 30, and 60 min after assuming the supine position to examine potential time-related effects. : Our study initially enrolled 97 infants, and the final analysis included a cohort of 72 infants. Ventilated infants exhibited significantly larger EELZ compared to their non-invasive counterparts ( = 0.026). DeltaZ was also greater in the invasive respiratory support group ( < 0.001). Heterogeneity was higher in the non-invasive group and did not change significantly over time. The non-invasive group demonstrated significantly greater ventilation in the dependent lung areas compared to intubated patients ( = 0.005). Regional distribution in the left lung was lower than in the right lung in both groups; however, this difference was significantly more pronounced in intubated patients ( < 0.001). : Our study revealed that volume-targeted mechanical ventilation results in higher EELZ and DeltaZ compared to spontaneously breathing infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. However, lung heterogeneity was lower during mechanical ventilation. Our study also reaffirmed that spontaneous breathing promotes greater involvement of the dependent lung compared to mechanical ventilation.
呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)常需要呼吸支持。虽然非侵入性方法通常是首选,但对于反应不足的患者,机械通气是必要的。我们的研究旨在使用电阻抗断层成像比较两种常见的呼吸支持模式,即容量目标机械通气和无创通气持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和高流量鼻导管(HFNC):极低出生体重和胎龄小于 32 周的婴儿有资格入组研究。所有入组的婴儿均已过过渡期(>72 小时)。婴儿分为两组:通过气管内管接受有创呼吸支持的婴儿和接受无创呼吸支持的婴儿。我们使用电阻抗断层成像评估呼气末肺阻抗(EELZ)、DeltaZ、异质性和区域通气分布。患者在仰卧位后 0、30 和 60 分钟进行评估,以检查潜在的时间相关影响。:我们的研究最初纳入了 97 名婴儿,最终分析包括 72 名婴儿的队列。与无创组相比,接受通气的婴儿的 EELZ 明显更大(=0.026)。DeltaZ 在有创呼吸支持组中也更大(<0.001)。非侵入性组的异质性更高,且随时间变化不明显。与插管患者相比,非侵入性组的依赖肺区通气明显更大(=0.005)。两组左肺的区域分布均低于右肺;然而,插管患者的这种差异更为明显(<0.001)。:我们的研究表明,与接受无创呼吸支持的自主呼吸婴儿相比,容量目标机械通气导致更高的 EELZ 和 DeltaZ。然而,机械通气时肺异质性较低。我们的研究还再次证实,与机械通气相比,自主呼吸可促进更多依赖肺区的参与。