个人防护设备不足因素与急性农药中毒的相关性:荟萃分析报告。

Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment Factors and Odds Related to Acute Pesticide Poisoning: A Meta-Analysis Report.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;21(3):257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030257.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute pesticide poisoning (APP) continues to affect farm workers, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The dose-response relationship between exposure and APP is well-researched, but pesticide exposure assessment in a practical environment is difficult to perform, considering various work practices and protections in place. It is well known that inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE) use is a risk factor of APP. However, it is unknown which types of inadequate PPE use, such as face or other types of general protection, are most harmful.

METHODS

This study aimed to identify if inadequate PPE use is an indicator of APP risk following established specifications for meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Included studies reported an odds ratio (OR) between PPE use to APP in agricultural workers. Data extracted from selected articles included authors, publication year, country of origin, farm type, population size, method of data collection and time frame of reported symptoms, job task, type of PPE and pesticides used, adjustments made in analysis, OR for APP, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, where ORs were pooled to assess an overall estimate for poisoning odds.

RESULTS

Our findings suggested that inadequate PPE use was associated with increased odds (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.16-2.12) of having APP. Failure to use general protection and inadequate face protection increased odds of APP by 1.29 times (95% CI = 0.88-1.90) and 1.92 times (95% CI = 1.23-3.00), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis results indicate that improper facial protection and general protection are not differently associated with APP odds. Our study concludes that more robust protection against inhalation and dermal contact are critical because any gaps in comprehensive full-body PPE would put workers and exposed populations at APP risk.

摘要

简介

急性农药中毒(APP)继续影响着农民,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)。暴露与 APP 之间的剂量反应关系已经得到了充分的研究,但在实际环境中进行农药暴露评估是困难的,因为存在各种工作实践和保护措施。众所周知,个人防护设备(PPE)使用不足是 APP 的一个风险因素。然而,尚不清楚哪种类型的 PPE 使用不足,如面部或其他类型的一般保护,是最有害的。

方法

本研究旨在确定 PPE 使用不足是否是 APP 风险的一个指标,这是为了满足对农业工人进行流行病学研究荟萃分析的既定规范。纳入的研究报告了 PPE 使用与 APP 之间的比值比(OR)。从选定文章中提取的数据包括作者、出版年份、原产国、农场类型、人口规模、数据收集方法和报告症状的时间范围、工作任务、使用的 PPE 和农药类型、分析中进行的调整、APP 的 OR 以及 95%置信区间(CI)。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,其中 OR 被汇总以评估中毒概率的总体估计值。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,PPE 使用不足与 APP 发生的几率增加有关(OR = 1.57,95% CI = 1.16-2.12)。不使用一般保护和不足的面部保护会使 APP 的几率增加 1.29 倍(95% CI = 0.88-1.90)和 1.92 倍(95% CI = 1.23-3.00)。

结论

荟萃分析结果表明,不当的面部保护和一般保护与 APP 几率没有不同的关联。我们的研究得出的结论是,更强大的针对吸入和皮肤接触的保护是至关重要的,因为任何全面的全身 PPE 中的差距都会使工人和暴露人群面临 APP 的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d72/10970141/e4e95091c787/ijerph-21-00257-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索