Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚使用农药的谷物种植农民的个人防护装备使用培训及其他预测因素。

Training and other predictors of personal protective equipment use in Australian grain farmers using pesticides.

作者信息

Macfarlane E, Chapman A, Benke G, Meaklim J, Sim M, McNeil J

机构信息

Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb;65(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.034843. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate patterns of use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce pesticide exposure in a sample of Australian farmers and also to assess the influence of possible predictive factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of 1102 farmers recruited through the Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) was conducted. A written questionnaire was filled out by participants at VFF meetings attended by a visiting research assistant. Participants answered questions about frequency of pesticide use and PPE items they usually used when doing two different pesticide-related tasks, mixing and application, of each of four classes of pesticides. They also answered questions about personal characteristics, farm characteristics, farming activities, career and health.

RESULTS

Nearly all surveyed farmers had ever used pesticides, and over 87% had used Herbicides or Animal Health Products in the previous 12 months. Non-use of PPE was frequently reported, with up to 10-40% of farmers routinely using no PPE at all when using pesticides. Across all pesticide classes, PPE use was higher for pesticide mixing than for application. In multivariate analyses PPE use appeared to be most strongly associated with younger age and farm chemical training.

CONCLUSIONS

PPE use across all pesticide classes was poor, indicating the possibility of clinically significant pesticide exposure in many farmers. Given that PPE use was found to be associated with farm chemical training, the authors suggest that training is likely to be an important intervention for reducing farmers' pesticide exposure. Poor uptake of farm chemical training by farmers and the aging farming workforce are causes for concern in the light of these findings.

摘要

目的

调查澳大利亚农民样本中使用个人防护装备(PPE)以减少农药暴露的模式,并评估可能的预测因素的影响。

方法

对通过维多利亚州农民联合会(VFF)招募的1102名农民进行了横断面调查。由来访的研究助理在VFF会议上让参与者填写一份书面问卷。参与者回答了有关农药使用频率以及在进行四类农药中每类农药的两种不同农药相关任务(混合和施用)时通常使用的PPE项目的问题。他们还回答了有关个人特征、农场特征、农事活动、职业和健康的问题。

结果

几乎所有接受调查的农民都曾使用过农药,超过87%的农民在过去12个月中使用过除草剂或动物保健产品。经常有报告称不使用PPE,在使用农药时,高达10%-40%的农民经常根本不使用任何PPE。在所有农药类别中,农药混合时的PPE使用率高于施用时。在多变量分析中,PPE的使用似乎与年龄较小和接受过农用化学品培训的关联最为密切。

结论

所有农药类别的PPE使用情况都很差,这表明许多农民可能存在具有临床意义的农药暴露。鉴于发现PPE的使用与农用化学品培训有关,作者建议培训可能是减少农民农药暴露的重要干预措施。鉴于这些发现,农民对农用化学品培训的接受度低以及农业劳动力老龄化令人担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验