• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自行车运动员的扭矩-踏频曲线和最大动态力量:一种新方法。

Torque-Cadence Profile and Maximal Dynamic Force in Cyclists: A Novel Approach.

机构信息

Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain.

Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;24(6):1997. doi: 10.3390/s24061997.

DOI:10.3390/s24061997
PMID:38544265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10976056/
Abstract

We aimed to determine the feasibility, test-retest reliability and long-term stability of a novel method for assessing the force (torque)-velocity (cadence) profile and maximal dynamic force (MDF) during leg-pedaling using a friction-loaded isoinertial cycle ergometer and a high-precision power-meter device. Fifty-two trained male cyclists completed a progressive loading test up to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) on a cycle ergometer. The MDF was defined as the force attained at the cycle performed with the 1RM-load. To examine the test-retest reliability and long-term stability of torque-cadence values, the progressive test was repeated after 72 h and also after 10 weeks of aerobic and strength training. The participants' MDF averaged 13.4 ± 1.3 N·kg, which was attained with an average pedal cadence of 21 ± 3 rpm. Participants' highest power output value was attained with a cadence of 110 ± 16 rpm (52 ± 5% MDF). The relationship between the MDF and cadence proved to be very strong (R = 0.978) and independent of the cyclists' MDF ( = 0.66). Cadence values derived from this relationship revealed a very high test-retest repeatability (mean SEM = 4 rpm, 3.3%) and long-term stability (SEM = 3 rpm, 2.3%); despite increases in the MDF following the 10-week period. Our findings support the validity, reliability and long-term stability of this method for the assessment of the torque-cadence profile and MDF in cyclists.

摘要

我们旨在确定一种使用摩擦加载等动式功率自行车和高精度功率计设备评估腿部蹬踏时力(扭矩)-速度(转速)曲线和最大动态力(MDF)的新方法的可行性、重测信度和长期稳定性。52 名经过训练的男性自行车运动员在功率自行车上完成了递增负荷测试,直至达到 1 次重复最大负荷(1RM)。MDF 定义为在进行 1RM 负荷的循环时达到的力。为了检验扭矩-转速值的重测信度和长期稳定性,在 72 小时后和 10 周的有氧和力量训练后,重复进行了递增测试。参与者的 MDF 平均为 13.4 ± 1.3 N·kg,平均转速为 21 ± 3 rpm。参与者的最大功率输出值在转速为 110 ± 16 rpm 时达到(52 ± 5% MDF)。MDF 与转速之间的关系非常强(R = 0.978),并且与自行车运动员的 MDF 无关(= 0.66)。由此关系得出的转速值具有非常高的重测信度(平均值 SEM = 4 rpm,3.3%)和长期稳定性(SEM = 3 rpm,2.3%);尽管在 10 周后 MDF 有所增加。我们的研究结果支持该方法评估自行车运动员扭矩-转速曲线和 MDF 的有效性、可靠性和长期稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/030479bc9db6/sensors-24-01997-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/45ed704898e3/sensors-24-01997-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/f2a33224e02f/sensors-24-01997-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/1a311976f876/sensors-24-01997-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/030479bc9db6/sensors-24-01997-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/45ed704898e3/sensors-24-01997-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/f2a33224e02f/sensors-24-01997-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/1a311976f876/sensors-24-01997-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/10976056/030479bc9db6/sensors-24-01997-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Torque-Cadence Profile and Maximal Dynamic Force in Cyclists: A Novel Approach.自行车运动员的扭矩-踏频曲线和最大动态力量:一种新方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;24(6):1997. doi: 10.3390/s24061997.
2
Force-velocity profiles of track cyclists differ between seated and non-seated positions.场地自行车运动员在坐姿和非坐姿下的力速曲线存在差异。
Sports Biomech. 2023 Apr;22(4):621-632. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2092029. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Force-velocity test on a stationary cycle ergometer: methodological recommendations.固定自行车测力计的力-速度测试:方法学建议。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Apr 1;124(4):831-839. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00719.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Reliability and Validity of Cycling Sprint Performance at Isolinear Mode Without Torque Factor: A Preliminary Study in Well-Trained Male Cyclists.等张模式下无扭矩因素的自行车冲刺性能的可靠性和有效性:对优秀男性自行车运动员的初步研究。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2024 Sep;95(3):722-729. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2023.2298752. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Effects on the crank torque profile when changing pedalling cadence in level ground and uphill road cycling.在平路和上坡骑行中改变蹬踏频率时对曲柄扭矩曲线的影响。
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1003-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.037.
6
Foot orthoses do not affect crank power output during maximal exercise on a cycle-ergometer.足部矫形器不会影响在自行车测力计上进行最大运动时的曲柄功率输出。
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 May;19(5):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 9.
7
Neuromuscular, metabolic, and kinetic adaptations for skilled pedaling performance in cyclists.自行车运动员熟练蹬踏表现的神经肌肉、代谢和动力学适应性
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Mar;30(3):442-9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199803000-00016.
8
Laboratory versus outdoor cycling conditions: differences in pedaling biomechanics.实验室与户外骑行条件:蹬踏生物力学的差异
J Appl Biomech. 2007 May;23(2):87-92. doi: 10.1123/jab.23.2.87.
9
Isovelocity vs. Isoinertial Sprint Cycling Tests for Power- and Torque-cadence Relationships.等速与等动冲刺踏车测试的功率-转速和扭矩-转速关系。
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(14):897-902. doi: 10.1055/a-0989-2387. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
The effect of low- vs high-cadence interval training on the freely chosen cadence and performance in endurance-trained cyclists.低节奏与高节奏间歇训练对耐力训练自行车运动员自由选择的节奏和运动表现的影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6):666-73. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0562. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyclists do not need to incorporate off-bike resistance training to increase strength, muscle-tendon structure, and pedaling performance: Exploring a high-intensity on-bike method.骑自行车的人无需进行自行车外的抗阻训练来增强力量、改善肌肉肌腱结构和提高蹬踏性能:探索一种高强度的自行车上训练方法。
Biol Sport. 2025 Feb 5;42(3):185-195. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.146790. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The load-velocity relationship in the jump squat exercise.纵跳深蹲练习中的负荷-速度关系。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):611-614. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.118019. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Editorial: The force-velocity relationship: Assessment and adaptations provoked by exercise, disuse and disease.社论:力量-速度关系:运动、废用和疾病引起的评估与适应
Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 21;13:1062041. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1062041. eCollection 2022.
3
Field-testing to determine power - cadence and torque - cadence profiles in professional road cyclists.
专业公路自行车运动员功率-踏频和扭矩-踏频特征的现场测试。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Jul;23(7):1085-1093. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2095307. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
4
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.定义培训和绩效水平:参与者分类框架。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
Reproducibility of the Rotor 2INpower Crankset for Monitoring Cycling Power Output: A Comprehensive Analysis in Different Real-Context Situations.Rotor 2INpower 曲柄在监测踏频功率输出中的可重复性:不同真实情境下的综合分析。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Jan 1;17(1):120-125. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0137. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
A comprehensive analysis of the velocity-based method in the shoulder press exercise: stability of the load-velocity relationship and sticking region parameters.卧推练习中基于速度方法的综合分析:负荷-速度关系的稳定性及停滞区域参数
Biol Sport. 2021 Jun;38(2):235-243. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.98453. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Level of Effort: A Reliable and Practical Alternative to the Velocity-Based Approach for Monitoring Resistance Training.努力程度:监测抗阻训练的可靠且实用的替代方案,优于基于速度的方法。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):2992-2999. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004060. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Effects of Moderate-to-Heavy Sled Training Using Different Magnitudes of Velocity Loss in Professional Soccer Players.职业足球运动员使用不同速度损失幅度进行中等到重度雪橇训练的效果
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Mar 1;37(3):629-635. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003813. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Validity of Using Velocity to Estimate Intensity in Resistance Exercises in Men and Women.用速度估计男性和女性抗阻运动强度的有效性。
Int J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;41(14):1047-1055. doi: 10.1055/a-1171-2287. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
Assessment of the two-point method applied in field conditions for routine testing of muscle mechanical capacities in a leg cycle ergometer.评估两点法在现场条件下用于腿部循环测功计中肌肉机械能力常规测试的适用性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):1877-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3925-9. Epub 2018 Jun 26.